Real-Life Active Surveillance of a Naphazoline/ Hypromellose Fixed Combination's Safety Profile in Peruvian Population.

Homero Contreras-Salinas, Mariana Barajas-Hernández, Leopoldo Martín Baiza-Durán, Vanessa Orozco-Ceja, Lourdes Yolotzin Rodríguez-Herrera
Author Information
  1. Homero Contreras-Salinas: Pharmacovigilance Department, Laboratorios Sophia S.A. de C.V., Zapopan, Jalisco, México. ORCID
  2. Mariana Barajas-Hernández: Pharmacovigilance Department, Laboratorios Sophia S.A. de C.V., Zapopan, Jalisco, México. ORCID
  3. Leopoldo Martín Baiza-Durán: Pharmacovigilance Department, Laboratorios Sophia S.A. de C.V., Zapopan, Jalisco, México.
  4. Vanessa Orozco-Ceja: Pharmacovigilance Department, Laboratorios Sophia S.A. de C.V., Zapopan, Jalisco, México.
  5. Lourdes Yolotzin Rodríguez-Herrera: Pharmacovigilance Department, Laboratorios Sophia S.A. de C.V., Zapopan, Jalisco, México. ORCID

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Identifying the adverse reactions and the possible risks associated with the use of naphazoline 0.1% + hypromellose 0.5% (NAPH), thereby evaluating its tolerability and safety profile.
METHODS: A total of 236 Peruvian patients were included in an active pharmacovigilance study drug event monitoring consisting in 2 phone calls conducted in order to register adverse drug reactions (ADRs), the product's tolerability and to assess the risk concerning specific clinical and demographic characteristics using a binary logistic regression model.
RESULTS: A total of 54 ADRs (one per patient) were reported after the use of NAPH; classified (according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities) into two groups of System Organ Class (SOC): eye disorders and nervous system disorders; and four groups of preferred term (PT): eye irritation, vision blurred, eye pruritus and headache. All ADRs were expected, mild and not serious. No risk factors related to the clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients were identified.
CONCLUSION: The low incidence of ADRs, their short recovery time, and their categorization as "mild" and "not serious" demonstrates the high tolerability in the studied population; therefore, according to the study, the safety profile for NAPH seems to be adequate, with a suitable tolerability.

Keywords

References

  1. Ann Intern Med. 2019 Feb 5;170(3):201-202 [PMID: 30597488]
  2. Popul Health Manag. 2013 Jun;16(3):147-9 [PMID: 23530466]
  3. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Nov;17(11):e486-e492 [PMID: 27819246]
  4. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2021 May 27;13:117-123 [PMID: 34079383]
  5. Drug Saf. 2014 Aug;37(8):617-28 [PMID: 25052742]
  6. Drug Saf. 2016 Sep;39(9):859-72 [PMID: 27314405]
  7. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 23;2:CD009729 [PMID: 26905373]
  8. Drug Saf. 1999 Dec;21(6):429-47 [PMID: 10612268]
  9. Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Oct;25(8):983.e1-2 [PMID: 17920988]
  10. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2019 Aug;42(4):443-449 [PMID: 30573298]
  11. Yale J Biol Med. 2018 Mar 28;91(1):13-21 [PMID: 29599653]
  12. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar 03;29(2):139-141 [PMID: 28626826]
  13. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1977 Mar;16(3):240-2 [PMID: 844979]
  14. Arch Ophthal. 1950 Apr;43(4):712-7 [PMID: 15411293]
  15. Acta Neurol Scand. 1993 Apr;87(4):322-4 [PMID: 8503264]
  16. Ophthalmologica. 2004 Sep-Oct;218(5):350-5 [PMID: 15334017]
  17. Clin Optom (Auckl). 2020 Jul 23;12:95-105 [PMID: 32801982]
  18. Cephalalgia. 2000 Dec;20(10):907-18 [PMID: 11304026]
  19. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Nov;23(11):2629-36 [PMID: 17868503]
  20. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1992 Sep;49(9):2229-32 [PMID: 1524068]
  21. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jul;74(7):863-871 [PMID: 29637279]
  22. Cephalalgia. 2003 May;23(4):245-57 [PMID: 12716341]
  23. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug;97(5):505-509 [PMID: 30479070]
  24. F1000Res. 2013 Nov 11;2:237 [PMID: 25110575]
  25. Lancet. 1997 Feb 8;349(9049):399-400 [PMID: 9033472]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0tolerabilitydrugADRsadverseNAPHeyereactionsusenaphazoline0hypromellosesafetyprofiletotalPeruvianpatientspharmacovigilancestudyeventmonitoringriskclinicaldemographiccharacteristicsaccordinggroups:disordersOBJECTIVE:Identifyingpossiblerisksassociated1%+5%therebyevaluatingMETHODS:236includedactiveconsisting2phonecallsconductedorderregisterproduct'sassessconcerningspecificusingbinarylogisticregressionmodelRESULTS:54oneperpatientreportedclassifiedMedicalDictionaryRegulatoryActivitiestwoSystemOrganClassSOCnervoussystemfourpreferredtermPTirritationvisionblurredpruritusheadacheexpectedmildseriousfactorsrelatedidentifiedCONCLUSION:lowincidenceshortrecoverytimecategorization"mild""notserious"demonstrateshighstudiedpopulationthereforeseemsadequatesuitableReal-LifeActiveSurveillanceNaphazoline/HypromelloseFixedCombination'sSafetyProfilePopulationreaction

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.