A Scoping Review of the Factors That Influence Families' Ability or Capacity to Provide Young People With Emotional Support Over the Transition to Adulthood.

Emily Stapley, Isabella Vainieri, Elizabeth Li, Hannah Merrick, Mairi Jeffery, Sally Foreman, Polly Casey, Roz Ullman, Melissa Cortina
Author Information
  1. Emily Stapley: Evidence Based Practice Unit, Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom.
  2. Isabella Vainieri: Evidence Based Practice Unit, Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom.
  3. Elizabeth Li: Evidence Based Practice Unit, Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom.
  4. Hannah Merrick: Evidence Based Practice Unit, Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom.
  5. Mairi Jeffery: Evidence Based Practice Unit, Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom.
  6. Sally Foreman: Evidence Based Practice Unit, Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom.
  7. Polly Casey: Evidence Based Practice Unit, Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom.
  8. Roz Ullman: Riches & Ullman LLP, Carshalton, United Kingdom.
  9. Melissa Cortina: Evidence Based Practice Unit, Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom.

Abstract

The transition to adulthood is typically marked by changes in relationships with family members, peers, and romantic partners. Despite this, the family often maintains a prominent role in young adults' lives. A scoping review was conducted to identify the factors that influence families' ability or capacity to provide young people with emotional support during the transition to adulthood, and to understand the gaps in this research area. Title and abstract searches were conducted from January 2007 to February 2021 in multiple databases, including PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and Sociological Abstracts. Fifteen semi-structured interviews were also conducted with stakeholders (professionals from relevant sectors/working within this field). In total, 277 articles were eligible for inclusion in the review. Following data extraction, 19 factors were identified. Factors with the most research (more than 20 articles) included: family proximity or co-residence; mental health; sex or gender differences; and family communication. Factors with less research included: societal context; young person's sexual orientation or gender identity; social networks; and adverse life events. Gaps in the research area were also identified, including methodological issues (e.g., lack of mixed methods and longitudinal study designs), a disproportionate focus on the parent-child relationship, and a lack of contextually situated research. Our findings indicate that future research in this area could benefit from taking an intersectional, multi-method approach, with a focus on the whole family and diverse samples.

Keywords

References

  1. J Marriage Fam. 2013 Aug 1;75(4):981-994 [PMID: 24244050]
  2. J Res Adolesc. 2018 Sep;28(3):698-710 [PMID: 29144027]
  3. Dev Psychol. 2020 May;56(5):993-1008 [PMID: 32134308]
  4. J Marriage Fam. 2016 Apr 1;78(2):431-450 [PMID: 27022198]
  5. Fam Process. 2020 Jun;59(2):807-821 [PMID: 31119736]
  6. J Fam Psychol. 2013 Feb;27(1):86-95 [PMID: 23421836]
  7. J Abnorm Psychol. 2011 Nov;120(4):878-89 [PMID: 21842967]
  8. Am Psychol. 2000 May;55(5):469-80 [PMID: 10842426]
  9. Gerontologist. 2011 Aug;51(4):441-52 [PMID: 21199862]
  10. Behav Genet. 2011 Mar;41(2):223-33 [PMID: 20680431]
  11. J Soc Pers Relat. 2020 Feb;37(2):516-537 [PMID: 33840878]
  12. Personal Disord. 2017 Jan;8(1):54-63 [PMID: 26642230]
  13. J Pers. 2007 Jun;75(3):535-68 [PMID: 17489891]
  14. J Marriage Fam. 2012 Oct 1;74(5):1069-1083 [PMID: 24092949]
  15. Psychol Rep. 2007 Apr;100(2):672-4 [PMID: 17564243]
  16. Future Child. 2010 Spring;20(1):67-87 [PMID: 20364622]
  17. Front Psychol. 2014 May 08;5:392 [PMID: 24847296]
  18. J Psychol. 2011 Jan-Feb;145(1):1-22 [PMID: 21290927]
  19. J Fam Psychol. 2014 Dec;28(6):877-86 [PMID: 25221972]
  20. J Adolesc. 2014 Dec;37(8):1489-503 [PMID: 25154544]
  21. Gerontologist. 2012 Apr;52(2):199-209 [PMID: 22250130]
  22. J Fam Psychol. 2018 Apr;32(3):385-395 [PMID: 29698011]
  23. J Res Adolesc. 2016 Dec;26(4):979-990 [PMID: 28453192]
  24. J Early Adolesc. 2013 Apr;33(3):404-428 [PMID: 23828712]
  25. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2018 Dec;49(6):843-852 [PMID: 29582206]
  26. Gerontology. 2013;59(1):64-70 [PMID: 23037718]
  27. Dev Psychol. 2008 Nov;44(6):1519-36 [PMID: 18999319]
  28. J Psychosom Res. 2009 Apr;66(4):309-16 [PMID: 19302888]
  29. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2011 Jan-Feb;14(1-2):71-4 [PMID: 20973676]
  30. Fam Process. 2007 Mar;46(1):53-65 [PMID: 17375728]
  31. Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Dec;39(6):1415-28 [PMID: 19937374]
  32. J Child Fam Stud. 2013 Apr;22(3): [PMID: 24244085]
  33. J Marriage Fam. 2020 Feb;82(1):383-403 [PMID: 38831801]
  34. PLoS One. 2018 Aug 16;13(8):e0202330 [PMID: 30114286]
  35. J Youth Adolesc. 2009 Jan;38(1):75-88 [PMID: 19636793]
  36. PLoS One. 2016 May 04;11(5):e0153715 [PMID: 27144447]
  37. J Marriage Fam. 2009 Dec 1;71(5):1220-1233 [PMID: 20161599]
  38. Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 14;12:732899 [PMID: 34721198]
  39. Fam Process. 2015 Jun;54(2):217-31 [PMID: 25620663]
  40. Am Psychol. 2004 Nov;59(8):676-684 [PMID: 15554821]
  41. Fam Process. 2014 Jun;53(2):267-87 [PMID: 24684188]
  42. J Youth Adolesc. 2011 Jun;40(6):730-43 [PMID: 20809102]
  43. Int J Public Health. 2016 May;61(4):487-94 [PMID: 26841893]
  44. J Psychol. 2017 Aug 18;151(6):597-612 [PMID: 28985150]
  45. J Fam Psychol. 2005 Dec;19(4):512-22 [PMID: 16402866]
  46. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2012 Oct;43(5):747-60 [PMID: 22392416]
  47. Arch Sex Behav. 2014 Jul;43(5):901-16 [PMID: 23780518]
  48. Int J Behav Dev. 2017 Mar;41(2):155-164 [PMID: 28239217]
  49. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Nov;14(6):967-1005 [PMID: 31491364]
  50. J Adolesc. 2014 Jul;37(5):715-26 [PMID: 24411584]
  51. Dev Psychopathol. 2018 Dec;30(5):1715-1728 [PMID: 30168407]
  52. J Moral Educ. 2020;49(4):496-511 [PMID: 33041435]
  53. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013 Nov;68(6):902-11 [PMID: 23707999]
  54. J Adolesc. 2008 Apr;31(2):165-84 [PMID: 17629552]
  55. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473 [PMID: 30178033]
  56. J Fam Psychol. 2020 Jun;34(4):448-458 [PMID: 31599601]
  57. Child Dev Perspect. 2010;4(2):87-94 [PMID: 20700389]
  58. Gerontologist. 2016 Oct;56(5):896-908 [PMID: 26035892]
  59. J Child Fam Stud. 2015 Oct 1;24(10):2957-2965 [PMID: 26512195]
  60. Span J Psychol. 2012 Nov;15(3):1000-12 [PMID: 23156909]
  61. J Marriage Fam. 2015 Aug;77(4):844-865 [PMID: 26339102]
  62. J Pers. 2016 Dec;84(6):716-725 [PMID: 26190774]
  63. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2009 Jun;12(2):63-72 [PMID: 19802956]
  64. J Interpers Violence. 2020 Aug;35(15-16):3102-3123 [PMID: 29294744]
  65. Soc Forces. 2016 Sep;95(1):321-354 [PMID: 27795587]
  66. Dev Psychol. 2017 May;53(5):949-961 [PMID: 28358534]
  67. Dev Psychopathol. 2018 Dec;30(5):1589-1609 [PMID: 30451135]
  68. Dev Psychopathol. 2004 Fall;16(4):1071-94 [PMID: 15704828]
  69. Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 15;11:486915 [PMID: 33178058]
  70. J Psychol. 2020;154(5):346-366 [PMID: 32394798]
  71. Int J Prison Health. 2018 Mar 12;14(1):34-45 [PMID: 29480768]
  72. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Feb 09;16:15 [PMID: 26857112]
  73. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 May 31;14(5):481-492 [PMID: 30946459]
  74. J Affect Disord. 2019 Oct 1;257:91-99 [PMID: 31299409]
  75. J Interpers Violence. 2021 Mar;36(5-6):2612-2632 [PMID: 29528803]
  76. Adolescence. 2008 Spring;43(169):71-88 [PMID: 18447081]
  77. J Youth Adolesc. 2010 Oct;39(10):1189-98 [PMID: 20383570]
  78. J Adolesc. 2014 Dec;37(8):1421-33 [PMID: 24767635]
  79. Child Dev. 2013 Mar-Apr;84(2):471-84 [PMID: 23006140]
  80. J Marriage Fam. 2012 Aug;74(4):880-896 [PMID: 26336323]
  81. J Fam Issues. 2018 Sep;39(13):3641-3663 [PMID: 30906094]
  82. Dev Psychol. 2010 Jan;46(1):139-50 [PMID: 20053013]
  83. J Marriage Fam. 2016 Jun 1;78(3):730-743 [PMID: 27152051]
  84. Soc Sci Res. 2019 Feb;78:203-214 [PMID: 30670216]
  85. Emerg Adulthood. 2017;5(5):337-350 [PMID: 30555752]
  86. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2018;54:259-282 [PMID: 29455865]
  87. J Marriage Fam. 2013 Jun 1;75(3):713-733 [PMID: 23935214]
  88. J Adolesc. 2009 Aug;32(4):835-48 [PMID: 19010525]
  89. Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Nov;28(6):2299-2311 [PMID: 32511853]
  90. Psychooncology. 2019 Sep;28(9):1845-1853 [PMID: 31250504]
  91. J Fam Psychol. 2018 Dec;32(8):1130-1141 [PMID: 29939042]
  92. Psychol Addict Behav. 2014 Sep;28(3):790-804 [PMID: 25134050]
  93. J Res Adolesc. 2011 Jun;21(2):461-474 [PMID: 21765625]
  94. Dev Sci. 2017 Nov;20(6): [PMID: 28139051]
  95. J Fam Psychol. 2007 Jun;21(2):195-205 [PMID: 17605542]
  96. Innov Aging. 2017 Nov;1(3):igx026 [PMID: 29795793]
  97. Fam J Alex Va. 2012 Jul;20(3): [PMID: 24307832]
  98. J Fam Issues. 2016 Jul;37(10):1384-1411 [PMID: 27594722]
  99. Dev Psychopathol. 2016 Feb;28(1):149-66 [PMID: 25924807]
  100. J Fam Psychol. 2019 Oct;33(7):797-808 [PMID: 31318272]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0familyresearchyoungtransitionadulthoodreviewconductedsupportareaFactorsscopingfactorsemotionalincludingalsoarticlesidentifiedincluded:gendersociallackfocusadulttypicallymarkedchangesrelationshipsmemberspeersromanticpartnersDespiteoftenmaintainsprominentroleadults'livesidentifyinfluencefamilies'abilitycapacityprovidepeopleunderstandgapsTitleabstractsearchesJanuary2007February2021multipledatabasesPsycINFOMEDLINESociologicalAbstractsFifteensemi-structuredinterviewsstakeholdersprofessionalsrelevantsectors/workingwithinfieldtotal277eligibleinclusionFollowingdataextraction1920proximityco-residencementalhealthsexdifferencescommunicationlesssocietalcontextperson'ssexualorientationidentitynetworksadverselifeeventsGapsmethodologicalissuesegmixedmethodslongitudinalstudydesignsdisproportionateparent-childrelationshipcontextuallysituatedfindingsindicatefuturebenefittakingintersectionalmulti-methodapproachwholediversesamplesScopingReviewInfluenceFamilies'AbilityCapacityProvideYoungPeopleEmotionalSupportTransitionAdulthoodemerging

Similar Articles

Cited By