Rapid saccadic categorization of other-race faces.

Peter de Lissa, Nayla Sokhn, Sasha Lasrado, Kanji Tanaka, Katsumi Watanabe, Roberto Caldara
Author Information
  1. Peter de Lissa: Eye and Brain Mapping Laboratory (iBMLab), Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
  2. Nayla Sokhn: Eye and Brain Mapping Laboratory (iBMLab), Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
  3. Sasha Lasrado: Eye and Brain Mapping Laboratory (iBMLab), Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
  4. Kanji Tanaka: Faculty of Arts and Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
  5. Katsumi Watanabe: Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.
  6. Roberto Caldara: Eye and Brain Mapping Laboratory (iBMLab), Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.

Abstract

The human visual system is very fast and efficient at extracting socially relevant information from faces. Visual studies employing foveated faces have consistently reported faster categorization by race response times for other-race compared with same-race faces. However, in everyday life we typically encounter faces outside the foveated visual field. In study 1, we explored whether and how race is categorized extrafoveally in same- and other-race faces normalized for low-level properties by tracking eye movements of Western Caucasian and East Asian observers in a saccadic response task. The results show that not only are people sensitive to race in faces presented outside of central vision, but the speed advantage in categorizing other-race faces occurs astonishingly quickly in as little as 200 ms. Critically, this visual categorization process was approximately 300 ms faster than the typical button press responses on centrally presented foveated faces. Study 2 investigated the genesis of the extrafoveal saccadic response speed advantage by comparing the influences of the response modality (button presses and saccadic responses), as well as the potential contribution of the impoverished low-spatial frequency spectrum characterizing extrafoveal visual information processing. Button press race categorization was not significantly faster with reconstructed retinal-filtered low spatial frequency faces, regardless of the visual field presentation. The speed of race categorization was significantly boosted only by extrafoveal saccades and not centrally foveated faces. Race is a potent, rapid, and effective visual signal transmitted by faces used for the categorization of ingroup/outgroup members. This fast universal visual categorization can occur outside central vision, igniting a cascade of social processes.

References

  1. PLoS One. 2010 Mar 18;5(3):e9708 [PMID: 20305776]
  2. Psychol Sci. 2005 Jun;16(6):440-4 [PMID: 15943669]
  3. Perception. 2010;39(11):1491-503 [PMID: 21313946]
  4. J Vis. 2016 Jan 1;16(2):10 [PMID: 27404483]
  5. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Feb;43(2):294-306 [PMID: 27819456]
  6. Int J Psychophysiol. 2011 Feb;79(2):266-71 [PMID: 21055428]
  7. Br J Psychol. 2009 Nov;100(Pt 4):717-28 [PMID: 19228441]
  8. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2000 Dec;129(4):559-74 [PMID: 11142869]
  9. PLoS One. 2018 May 30;13(5):e0197160 [PMID: 29847562]
  10. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 25;10(8):e0136548 [PMID: 26305788]
  11. Neuropsychologia. 2014 Jan;52:57-72 [PMID: 24200921]
  12. Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jun;48(7):2027-40 [PMID: 20362599]
  13. Mem Cognit. 1994 Mar;22(2):208-24 [PMID: 8035697]
  14. J Vis. 2009 Feb 09;9(2):7.1-16 [PMID: 19271917]
  15. Biol Psychol. 2009 May;81(2):103-9 [PMID: 19428974]
  16. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1991 May;43(2):161-204 [PMID: 1866456]
  17. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2009 Mar;9(1):122-31 [PMID: 19246333]
  18. Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 29;8(1):1816 [PMID: 29379032]
  19. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995 Nov;21(6):1608-23 [PMID: 7490581]
  20. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21584 [PMID: 21720562]
  21. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Dec 24;7:898 [PMID: 24399955]
  22. Perception. 2009;38(8):1199-210 [PMID: 19817152]
  23. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Dec;83(6):1314-29 [PMID: 12500813]
  24. Biol Psychol. 2016 Dec;121(Pt A):84-90 [PMID: 27756579]
  25. Vision Res. 2011 Dec 8;51(23-24):2462-70 [PMID: 22008980]
  26. Vision Res. 2013 Aug 30;89:39-46 [PMID: 23867566]
  27. Perception. 2006;35(5):659-70 [PMID: 16836056]
  28. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1992 May;44(4):671-703 [PMID: 1615169]
  29. Emotion. 2009 Jun;9(3):350-60 [PMID: 19485612]
  30. Brain Topogr. 2014 Sep;27(5):663-71 [PMID: 24375283]
  31. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Sep;35(5):1105-22 [PMID: 19686008]
  32. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2008 Mar;3(1):16-25 [PMID: 19015091]
  33. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Mar;114(3):515-28 [PMID: 12705432]
  34. Cognition. 2019 May;186:42-49 [PMID: 30739058]
  35. Behav Res Methods. 2018 Dec;50(6):2388-2398 [PMID: 29423736]
  36. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Dec;15(6):1093-9 [PMID: 19001573]
  37. Psychol Sci. 2005 Mar;16(3):180-3 [PMID: 15733196]
  38. PLoS One. 2008 Aug 20;3(8):e3022 [PMID: 18714387]
  39. Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42 [PMID: 9176953]
  40. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Oct;85(4):616-26 [PMID: 14561116]
  41. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2002 Nov;34(4):613-7 [PMID: 12564564]
  42. Psychol Sci. 2006 Jul;17(7):608-15 [PMID: 16866747]
  43. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Aug 20;116(34):16793-16798 [PMID: 31383756]
  44. Neuroreport. 2004 Apr 9;15(5):905-10 [PMID: 15073540]
  45. Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 24;9(1):560 [PMID: 30679472]
  46. Vision Res. 2006 May;46(11):1762-76 [PMID: 16289663]
  47. Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 24;8:1152 [PMID: 28970809]
  48. Behav Res Methods. 2017 Apr;49(2):559-575 [PMID: 27142836]
  49. Behav Res Methods. 2010 Aug;42(3):671-84 [PMID: 20805589]
  50. Vis cogn. 2013 Jan 1;21(9-10):1138-1164 [PMID: 24723788]
  51. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Aug;81(2):181-92 [PMID: 11519925]
  52. Vision Res. 2017 Apr;133:100-111 [PMID: 28202396]
  53. Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6 [PMID: 9176952]
  54. J Vis. 2010 Jun 01;10(6):21 [PMID: 20884570]
  55. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2018 Jul - Sep;35(5-6):304-313 [PMID: 29749293]
  56. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 04;10(6):e0127709 [PMID: 26042843]
  57. J Vis. 2010 Apr 28;10(4):16.1-17 [PMID: 20465335]
  58. Front Psychol. 2011 Nov 21;2:342 [PMID: 22125544]
  59. J Vis. 2015;15(13):12 [PMID: 26382003]
  60. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Nov;49(13):3739-49 [PMID: 21971308]
  61. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Dec 21;9:679 [PMID: 26733850]
  62. Behav Res Methods. 2010 Feb;42(1):188-204 [PMID: 20160299]
  63. Cognition. 2017 Jan;158:33-43 [PMID: 27776224]
  64. Front Psychol. 2011 May 18;2:95 [PMID: 21886626]
  65. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 16;107(46):20081-6 [PMID: 21041643]

MeSH Term

Face
Humans
Pattern Recognition, Visual
Reaction Time
Saccades
Visual Perception
White People

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0facesvisualcategorizationracefoveatedresponseother-racesaccadicfasteroutsidespeedextrafovealfastinformationfieldpresentedcentralvisionadvantagemsbuttonpressresponsescentrallyfrequencysignificantlyhumansystemefficientextractingsociallyrelevantVisualstudiesemployingconsistentlyreportedtimescomparedsame-raceHowevereverydaylifetypicallyencounterstudy1exploredwhethercategorizedextrafoveallysame-normalizedlow-levelpropertiestrackingeyemovementsWesternCaucasianEastAsianobserverstaskresultsshowpeoplesensitivecategorizingoccursastonishinglyquicklylittle200Criticallyprocessapproximately300typicalStudy2investigatedgenesiscomparinginfluencesmodalitypresseswellpotentialcontributionimpoverishedlow-spatialspectrumcharacterizingprocessingButtonreconstructedretinal-filteredlowspatialregardlesspresentationboostedsaccadesRacepotentrapideffectivesignaltransmittedusedingroup/outgroupmembersuniversalcanoccurignitingcascadesocialprocessesRapid

Similar Articles

Cited By