Patient-Reported Factors Associated With Older Adults' Cancer Screening Decision-making: A Systematic Review.

Jenna Smith, Rachael H Dodd, Karen M Gainey, Vasi Naganathan, Erin Cvejic, Jesse Jansen, Kirsten J McCaffery
Author Information
  1. Jenna Smith: Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  2. Rachael H Dodd: Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  3. Karen M Gainey: Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  4. Vasi Naganathan: Centre for Education and Research on Ageing, Concord Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  5. Erin Cvejic: Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  6. Jesse Jansen: Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  7. Kirsten J McCaffery: Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Abstract

Importance: Decisions for older adults (aged ≥65 years) and their clinicians about whether to continue to screen for cancer are not easy. Many older adults who are frail or have limited life expectancy or comorbidities continue to be screened for cancer despite guidelines suggesting they should not; furthermore, many older adults have limited knowledge of the potential harms of continuing to be screened.
Objective: To summarize the patient-reported factors associated with older adults' decisions regarding screening for breast, prostate, colorectal, and cervical cancer.
Evidence Review: Studies were identified by searching databases from January 2000 to June 2020 and were independently assessed for inclusion by 2 authors. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were independently conducted by 2 authors, and then all decisions were cross-checked and discussed where necessary. Data analysis was performed from September to December 2020.
Findings: The search yielded 2475 records, of which 21 unique studies were included. Nine studies were quantitative, 8 were qualitative, and 4 used mixed method designs. Of the 21 studies, 17 were conducted in the US, and 10 of 21 assessed breast cancer screening decisions only. Factors associated with decision-making were synthesized into 5 categories: demographic, health and clinical, psychological, physician, and social and system. Commonly identified factors associated with the decision to undergo screening included personal or family history of cancer, positive screening attitudes, routine or habit, to gain knowledge, friends, and a physician's recommendation. Factors associated with the decision to forgo screening included being older, negative screening attitudes, and desire not to know about cancer. Some factors had varying associations, including insurance coverage, living in a nursing home, prior screening experience, health problems, limited life expectancy, perceived cancer risk, risks of screening, family, and a physician's recommendation to stop.
Conclusions and Relevance: Although guidelines suggest incorporating life expectancy and health status to inform older adults' cancer screening decisions, older adults' ingrained beliefs about screening may run counter to these concepts. Communication strategies are needed that support older adults to make informed cancer screening decisions by addressing underlying screening beliefs in context with their perceived and actual risk of developing cancer.

References

  1. J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720959234 [PMID: 33054558]
  2. Psychooncology. 2018 Jun;27(6):1635-1641 [PMID: 29575590]
  3. Br J Cancer. 2010 May 11;102(10):1461-7 [PMID: 20461091]
  4. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Feb;28(2):292-8 [PMID: 23054920]
  5. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Apr 7;150(7):465-73 [PMID: 19349631]
  6. Womens Health Issues. 2007 Nov-Dec;17(6):351-9 [PMID: 17936642]
  7. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 May;31(5):539-47 [PMID: 26941042]
  8. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jan;200(1):40.e1-7 [PMID: 18976734]
  9. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2011 Jan;4(1):9-18 [PMID: 21210573]
  10. Cancer Treat Rev. 2015 Feb;41(2):197-215 [PMID: 25579752]
  11. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Aug;34(8):1538-1545 [PMID: 31147981]
  12. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Sep;21(9):979-85 [PMID: 16918745]
  13. BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 13;8(2):e019171 [PMID: 29440214]
  14. Curr Oncol Rep. 2020 Aug 15;22(11):108 [PMID: 32803486]
  15. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2011645 [PMID: 32716514]
  16. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097 [PMID: 19621072]
  17. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 Jan;95(1):184-196 [PMID: 31902414]
  18. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 May 5;102(9):605-13 [PMID: 20413742]
  19. Cancer. 2014 May 15;120(10):1491-8 [PMID: 24523016]
  20. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Feb;144(1):193-204 [PMID: 24510010]
  21. BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 14;8(6):e021174 [PMID: 29903796]
  22. Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Mar;98(3):338-43 [PMID: 25499004]
  23. Breast. 2016 Aug;28:107-20 [PMID: 27290619]
  24. BMC Geriatr. 2007 Nov 16;7:26 [PMID: 18021402]
  25. Am J Med. 2011 Apr;124(4):369.e1-8 [PMID: 21435428]
  26. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Apr 8;173(7):526-31 [PMID: 23478883]
  27. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Oct;174(10):1558-65 [PMID: 25133746]
  28. Med Decis Making. 2019 Aug;39(6):621-631 [PMID: 31226903]
  29. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Apr;63(4):750-6 [PMID: 25900488]
  30. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Mar;61(3):388-95 [PMID: 23414437]
  31. JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e185461 [PMID: 30646275]
  32. Public Health Res Pract. 2017 Jul 26;27(2): [PMID: 28765861]
  33. JAMA. 2014 Apr 2;311(13):1336-47 [PMID: 24691609]
  34. JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jun 1;180(6):831-842 [PMID: 32310288]
  35. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;177(8):1121-1128 [PMID: 28604917]
  36. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 Jan;49(1):44-51 [PMID: 26108994]
  37. BMC Geriatr. 2006 Aug 03;6:10 [PMID: 16887040]
  38. BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 11;10(6):e034061 [PMID: 32532766]
  39. J Geriatr Oncol. 2015 Mar;6(2):93-100 [PMID: 25544380]
  40. Women Health. 2002;36(4):1-18 [PMID: 12555798]
  41. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Oct 1;113(10):1299-1328 [PMID: 33544867]
  42. J Urol. 2010 May;183(5):1798-802 [PMID: 20299039]
  43. Prev Med Rep. 2019 Jan 16;13:244-248 [PMID: 30719405]
  44. Age Ageing. 2000 Mar;29(2):131-5 [PMID: 10791447]
  45. Cancer J. 2017 Jul/Aug;23(4):246-253 [PMID: 28731949]
  46. JAMA Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;4(8):1126-1128 [PMID: 29955796]
  47. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jul;68(7):1462-1468 [PMID: 32232838]
  48. BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 14;8(6):e022138 [PMID: 29903800]

MeSH Term

Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Attitude to Health
Decision Making
Early Detection of Cancer
Female
Humans
Male
Mass Screening
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Patient Preference
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Physician-Patient Relations

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0screeningcancerolderdecisionsadultsassociatedlimitedlifeexpectancyfactorsadults'risk21studiesincludedFactorshealthcontinuescreenedguidelinesknowledgebreastidentified2020independentlyassessed2authorsDataconducteddecisionfamilyattitudesphysician'srecommendationperceivedbeliefsImportance:Decisionsaged≥65yearsclinicianswhetherscreeneasyManyfrailcomorbiditiesdespitesuggestingfurthermoremanypotentialharmscontinuingObjective:summarizepatient-reportedregardingprostatecolorectalcervicalEvidenceReview:StudiessearchingdatabasesJanuary2000Juneinclusionextractionbiasassessmentcross-checkeddiscussednecessaryanalysisperformedSeptemberDecemberFindings:searchyielded2475recordsuniqueNinequantitative8qualitative4usedmixedmethoddesigns17US10decision-makingsynthesized5categories:demographicclinicalpsychologicalphysiciansocialsystemCommonlyundergopersonalhistorypositiveroutinehabitgainfriendsforgonegativedesireknowvaryingassociationsincludinginsurancecoveragelivingnursinghomepriorexperienceproblemsrisksstopConclusionsRelevance:AlthoughsuggestincorporatingstatusinformingrainedmayruncounterconceptsCommunicationstrategiesneededsupportmakeinformedaddressingunderlyingcontextactualdevelopingPatient-ReportedAssociatedOlderAdults'CancerScreeningDecision-making:SystematicReview

Similar Articles

Cited By