Use of environmental scans in health services delivery research: a scoping review.

Patricia Charlton, Terri Kean, Rebecca H Liu, Daniel A Nagel, Rima Azar, Shelley Doucet, Alison Luke, William Montelpare, Kim Mears, Leah Boulos
Author Information
  1. Patricia Charlton: Adjunct Faculty, Faculty of Nursing, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada pcharlton@upei.ca. ORCID
  2. Terri Kean: Faculty of Nursing, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada. ORCID
  3. Rebecca H Liu: Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ORCID
  4. Daniel A Nagel: College of Nursing, University of Manitoba Faculty of Health Sciences, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. ORCID
  5. Rima Azar: Psychobiology of Stress and Health Lab, Psychology Department, Mount Allison University, Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada.
  6. Shelley Doucet: Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada. ORCID
  7. Alison Luke: Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada. ORCID
  8. William Montelpare: Department of Applied Human Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada. ORCID
  9. Kim Mears: Robertson Library, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada.
  10. Leah Boulos: Maritime SPOR SUPPORT Unit, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the extent and nature of evidence on the use of the environmental scan (ES) in the health services delivery literature.
DESIGN: Scoping review.
METHODS: This scoping review followed the five-stage scoping review methodology outlined by Khalil . A Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies was completed. Seven electronic databases and the grey literature were searched. Pairs of researchers independently performed two levels of screening and data extraction. Data were analysed using qualitative content and thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Ninety-six studies were included in the scoping review. Researchers conducted ESs for many purposes, the most common being to examine the current state of programmes, services or policies. Recommendations were informed by ESs in 20% of studies. Most common data collection methods were literature review (71%), key informant or semistructured interviews (46%) and surveys (35%). Over half (53%) of the studies used a combination of passive (looking at information eg, literature, policies, guidelines) and active (looking for information eg, surveys, interviews) approaches to data collection. Person sources of data (eg, healthcare stakeholders, community representatives) and non-person sources of data (eg, documents, electronic databases, the web) were drawn on to a similar extent. The thematic analysis of the definitions/descriptions yielded several themes including instrument of discovery, knowledge synthesis, forward-looking and decision making. Research gaps identified included absence of a standard definition, inconsistencies in terminology and lack of guiding frameworks in the health services delivery context.
CONCLUSION: ESs were conducted to gather evidence and to help inform decision making on a range of policy and health services delivery issues across the continuum of care. Consistency in terminology, a consensus definition and more guidance on ES design may help provide structure for researchers and other stakeholders, and ultimately advance ES as a methodological approach. A working definition of ES in a health services delivery context is presented.

Keywords

References

  1. Can J Diabetes. 2017 Dec;41(6):558-562 [PMID: 29037573]
  2. Am J Infect Control. 2017 Oct 1;45(10):1116-1126 [PMID: 28732739]
  3. Curr Oncol. 2009 Dec;16(6):29-41 [PMID: 20016744]
  4. Curr Oncol. 2018 Oct;25(5):e365-e372 [PMID: 30464686]
  5. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2016 Apr;13(2):118-23 [PMID: 26821833]
  6. ORNAC J. 2014 Sep;32(3):12-5, 24-9 [PMID: 25322531]
  7. BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 26;8(1):e019451 [PMID: 29374673]
  8. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2008 Dec;17(6):383-91 [PMID: 19128285]
  9. Aust Health Rev. 2008 Feb;32(1):56-65 [PMID: 18241149]
  10. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2018 Feb 1;28(1):38-45 [PMID: 31148622]
  11. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2009 Apr;21(3):192-203 [PMID: 19062263]
  12. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011 Jun;6(2-2):e58-61 [PMID: 20799914]
  13. Healthc Q. 2014;17(4):28-33 [PMID: 25906462]
  14. Vaccine. 2017 Sep 5;35(37):4930-4935 [PMID: 28774559]
  15. Health Promot Pract. 2014 Jul;15(4):483-95 [PMID: 24357862]
  16. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Dec;54(6):916-921.e1 [PMID: 28818629]
  17. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097 [PMID: 19621072]
  18. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017 Mar;18(2):149-160 [PMID: 27995826]
  19. Nurs Manage. 2020 Apr;51(4):40-47 [PMID: 32221127]
  20. J Genet Couns. 2018 May 16;: [PMID: 29770910]
  21. Int J Drug Policy. 2008 Jun;19(3):189-94 [PMID: 18472260]
  22. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jun;42(6 Suppl 2):S163-71 [PMID: 22704433]
  23. Am J Nurs. 2014 May;114(5):49-56 [PMID: 24759479]
  24. J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12(2):64-70 [PMID: 16539751]
  25. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2017;76(1):1320208 [PMID: 28494638]
  26. Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Aug 18;13:E109 [PMID: 27536901]
  27. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;209:75-83 [PMID: 25980708]
  28. Rural Remote Health. 2003 Oct-Dec;3(3):194 [PMID: 15882095]
  29. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6 [PMID: 27005575]
  30. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;67(12):1291-4 [PMID: 25034198]
  31. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 23;13:48 [PMID: 23522333]
  32. Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jul;51(1 Suppl 1):S17-23 [PMID: 27320460]
  33. Support Care Cancer. 2019 Apr;27(4):1153-1162 [PMID: 30726517]
  34. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Feb;21(e1):e50-4 [PMID: 23813566]
  35. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):141-6 [PMID: 26134548]
  36. Paediatr Child Health. 2018 May;23(3):e46-e55 [PMID: 29769815]
  37. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2014 Spring;24(2):78-88 [PMID: 24902425]
  38. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2018 Mar;47(2):202-213 [PMID: 29425679]
  39. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 12;14:69 [PMID: 24521300]
  40. Wound Repair Regen. 2015 Jan-Feb;23(1):22-9 [PMID: 25421743]
  41. JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 Mar 27;3(1):e18 [PMID: 24675395]
  42. Clin Med Res. 2017 Jun;15(1-2):21-32 [PMID: 28373288]
  43. Spinal Cord. 2014 May;52(5):400-6 [PMID: 24637567]
  44. Int J Equity Health. 2016 Apr 12;15:64 [PMID: 27068028]
  45. Health Care Manage Rev. 2018 Oct/Dec;43(4):303-314 [PMID: 28225447]
  46. J Cancer Educ. 2020 Aug;35(4):731-735 [PMID: 31020620]
  47. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2010 Sep;22(7):605-14 [PMID: 20576406]
  48. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Apr 1;25(4):408-412 [PMID: 29025034]
  49. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005 Apr;97(4):527-34 [PMID: 15868772]
  50. BMC Res Notes. 2020 Mar 26;13(1):179 [PMID: 32216824]
  51. Nurs Health Sci. 2013 Sep;15(3):398-405 [PMID: 23480423]
  52. BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 6;9(9):e029805 [PMID: 31494613]
  53. Papillomavirus Res. 2018 Jun;5:21-31 [PMID: 29248818]
  54. Long Range Plann. 1984 Apr;17(2):117-28 [PMID: 10299516]
  55. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473 [PMID: 30178033]
  56. Can Fam Physician. 2008 Jul;54(7):1022-3 [PMID: 18625830]
  57. Int Endod J. 2020 Feb;53(2):232-249 [PMID: 31520403]
  58. J Oncol Pract. 2013 Mar;9(2):107-11 [PMID: 23814520]
  59. J Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;22(9):1032-1038 [PMID: 30789297]
  60. Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69 [PMID: 20854677]
  61. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Dec 21;20(12):e11112 [PMID: 30578187]
  62. Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov;43(11):2360-9 [PMID: 26308435]
  63. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 03;12:236 [PMID: 22863276]
  64. Stroke. 2012 Aug;43(8):2078-85 [PMID: 22700532]
  65. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb 02;8:29 [PMID: 18241349]
  66. Curr Oncol. 2009 Jan;16(1):4-15 [PMID: 19229367]
  67. Brain Inj. 2014;28(8):1042-51 [PMID: 24654624]
  68. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2013;6:65-74 [PMID: 23483767]
  69. J Oncol Pract. 2012 Mar;8(2):97-102 [PMID: 23077436]
  70. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Sep;62(9):944-52 [PMID: 19230612]
  71. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2015 Aug;21(4):249-57 [PMID: 24714129]
  72. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Feb 09;16:15 [PMID: 26857112]
  73. BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 30;9(8):e027473 [PMID: 31473612]
  74. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Nov;39(11):924-934 [PMID: 30273096]
  75. Implement Sci. 2018 Jul 26;13(1):98 [PMID: 30045735]
  76. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Feb;39(2):151-158 [PMID: 29370546]
  77. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2015 Mar;40(3):302-5 [PMID: 25641026]
  78. Cancer Med. 2014 Aug;3(4):1052-61 [PMID: 24740973]
  79. Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2005 Jul-Sep;24(3):200-8 [PMID: 16131929]
  80. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Sep 24;15:76 [PMID: 26404088]
  81. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2009 Oct;30(10):615-23 [PMID: 19742371]
  82. Chronic Dis Inj Can. 2014 Feb;34(1):55-63 [PMID: 24618382]
  83. CADTH Technol Overv. 2010;1(3):e0122 [PMID: 22977412]
  84. CMAJ Open. 2017 Jun 21;5(2):E488-E495 [PMID: 28637683]

MeSH Term

Delivery of Health Care
Health Services
Health Services Research
Humans
Knowledge
Research Personnel

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthservicesreviewdeliverydataESliteraturescopingegstudiesESsdefinitionexamineextentevidenceenvironmentalelectronicdatabasesresearchersthematicanalysisincludedconductedcommonpoliciescollectionmethodsinterviewssurveyslookinginformationsourcesstakeholdersdecisionmakingterminologycontexthelppolicyOBJECTIVE:natureusescanDESIGN:ScopingMETHODS:followedfive-stagemethodologyoutlinedKhalilPeerReviewElectronicSearchStrategiescompletedSevengreysearchedPairsindependentlyperformedtwolevelsscreeningextractionDataanalysedusingqualitativecontentRESULTS:Ninety-sixResearchersmanypurposescurrentstateprogrammesRecommendationsinformed20%71%keyinformantsemistructured46%35%half53%usedcombinationpassiveguidelinesactiveapproachesPersonhealthcarecommunityrepresentativesnon-persondocumentswebdrawnsimilardefinitions/descriptionsyieldedseveralthemesincludinginstrumentdiscoveryknowledgesynthesisforward-lookingResearchgapsidentifiedabsencestandardinconsistencieslackguidingframeworksCONCLUSION:gatherinformrangeissuesacrosscontinuumcareConsistencyconsensusguidancedesignmayprovidestructureultimatelyadvancemethodologicalapproachworkingpresentedUsescansresearch:publicstatistics&research

Similar Articles

Cited By