Flexibility during the COVID-19 Pandemic Response: Healthcare Facility Assessment Tools for Resilient Evaluation.

Andrea Brambilla, Tian-Zhi Sun, Waleed Elshazly, Ahmed Ghazy, Paul Barach, Göran Lindahl, Stefano Capolongo
Author Information
  1. Andrea Brambilla: Design and Health Lab, Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering (DABC), Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy. ORCID
  2. Tian-Zhi Sun: Design and Health Lab, Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering (DABC), Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
  3. Waleed Elshazly: School of Architecture and Urban Planning (AUIC), Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
  4. Ahmed Ghazy: School of Architecture and Urban Planning (AUIC), Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
  5. Paul Barach: Design and Health Lab, Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering (DABC), Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
  6. Göran Lindahl: Design and Health Lab, Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering (DABC), Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.
  7. Stefano Capolongo: Design and Health Lab, Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction Engineering (DABC), Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.

Abstract

Healthcare facilities are facing huge challenges due to the outbreak of COVID-19. Around the world, national healthcare contingency plans have struggled to cope with the population health impact of COVID-19, with healthcare facilities and critical care systems buckling under the extraordinary pressures. COVID-19 has starkly highlighted the lack of reliable operational tools for assessing the level sof flexibility of a hospital building to support strategic and agile decision making. The aim of this study was to modify, improve and test an existing assessment tool for evaluating hospital facilities flexibility and resilience. We followed a five-step process for collecting data by (i) doing a literature review about flexibility principles and strategies, (ii) reviewing healthcare design guidelines, (iii) examining international healthcare facilities case studies, (iv) conducting a critical review and optimization of the existing tool, and (v) assessing the usability of the evaluation tool. The new version of the OFAT framework (Optimized Flexibility Assessment Tool) is composed of nine evaluation parameters and subdivided into measurable variables with scores ranging from 0 to 10. The pilot testing of case studies enabled the assessment and verification the OFAT validity and reliability in support of decision makers in addressing flexibility of hospital design and/or operations. Healthcare buildings need to be designed and built based on principles of flexibility to accommodate current healthcare operations, adapting to time-sensitive physical transformations and responding to contemporary and future public health emergencies.

Keywords

References

  1. Can J Anaesth. 2020 Jun;67(6):732-745 [PMID: 32162212]
  2. Ann Ig. 2012 Nov-Dec;24(6):543-52 [PMID: 23234192]
  3. Am J Disaster Med. 2020 Spring;15(2):143-148 [PMID: 32804395]
  4. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Apr;25(4):241-56 [PMID: 26408568]
  5. Am J Disaster Med. 2020 Summer;15(3):159-167 [PMID: 33270207]
  6. HERD. 2010 Winter;3(2):30-47 [PMID: 21165868]
  7. BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):e047446 [PMID: 33441368]
  8. Acta Biomed. 2020 Jul 20;91(9-S):50-60 [PMID: 32701917]
  9. Am J Med Qual. 2021 Mar-Apr 01;36(2):73-83 [PMID: 33830094]
  10. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2001 Nov;24(3):59-76 [PMID: 11858558]
  11. HERD. 2011 Summer;4(4):89-108 [PMID: 21960194]
  12. Acta Biomed. 2020 Apr 10;91(3-S):9-20 [PMID: 32275262]
  13. J Healthc Prot Manage. 2013;29(2):46-50 [PMID: 24020319]
  14. HERD. 2016 Winter;9(2):52-68 [PMID: 26169207]
  15. Chest. 2021 Feb;159(2):524-536 [PMID: 33069725]
  16. Popul Health Manag. 2021 Apr;24(2):174-181 [PMID: 33373536]
  17. HERD. 2021 Jan;14(1):47-60 [PMID: 32539464]
  18. J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jul;72(1):8-11 [PMID: 32305384]
  19. Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jul 14;9(7): [PMID: 34356266]
  20. Eur J Clin Invest. 2020 Jun;50(6):e13250 [PMID: 32367527]
  21. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 21;4:CD013582 [PMID: 32315451]
  22. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;67(12):1291-4 [PMID: 25034198]
  23. Nature. 2020 Jun;582(7813):557-560 [PMID: 32340022]
  24. Trauma Mon. 2013 Spring;18(1):21-7 [PMID: 24350145]
  25. Am J Crit Care. 2004 Jan;13(1):35-45 [PMID: 14735646]
  26. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143 [PMID: 30453902]
  27. Sci Total Environ. 2020 Nov 10;742:140540 [PMID: 32619843]
  28. Acta Biomed. 2020 May 11;91(2):45-49 [PMID: 32420924]
  29. Am J Med Qual. 2020 Sep/Oct;35(5):397-404 [PMID: 31941345]
  30. J Hosp Infect. 2020 Jun;105(2):119-127 [PMID: 32259546]
  31. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2016;52(1):63-9 [PMID: 27033620]
  32. HERD. 2018 Jan;11(1):15-30 [PMID: 29283007]
  33. HERD. 2021 Jul;14(3):169-181 [PMID: 33583222]

MeSH Term

COVID-19
Delivery of Health Care
Humans
Pandemics
Reproducibility of Results
SARS-CoV-2

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthcareflexibilityfacilitiesCOVID-19toolHealthcarehospitalassessmentevaluationhealthcriticalassessingsupportdecisionexistingreviewprinciplesdesigncasestudiesOFATFlexibilityAssessmentoperationsfacinghugechallengesdueoutbreakAroundworldnationalcontingencyplansstruggledcopepopulationimpactcaresystemsbucklingextraordinarypressuresstarklyhighlightedlackreliableoperationaltoolslevelsofbuildingstrategicagilemakingaimstudymodifyimprovetestevaluatingresiliencefollowedfive-stepprocesscollectingdataliteraturestrategiesiireviewingguidelinesiiiexamininginternationalivconductingoptimizationvusabilitynewversionframeworkOptimizedToolcomposednineparameterssubdividedmeasurablevariablesscoresranging010pilottestingenabledverificationvalidityreliabilitymakersaddressingand/orbuildingsneeddesignedbuiltbasedaccommodatecurrentadaptingtime-sensitivephysicaltransformationsrespondingcontemporaryfuturepublicemergenciesPandemicResponse:FacilityToolsResilientEvaluationhospitals

Similar Articles

Cited By