Illegitimate Tasks and Employees' Turnover Intention: A Serial Mediation Model.

Xiaoye Zeng, Yafu Huang, Shouying Zhao, Lianping Zeng
Author Information
  1. Xiaoye Zeng: School of Psychology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China.
  2. Yafu Huang: School of Psychology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China.
  3. Shouying Zhao: School of Psychology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China.
  4. Lianping Zeng: School of Psychology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China.

Abstract

In the historical and cultural context of developing countries, such as China, illegitimate tasks have become an important source of workplace pressure for employees. Guided by the framework of the stress-as-offense-to-self theory, we explored how illegitimate tasks increase turnover intention. A total of 474 employees from China effectively completed the online survey. The results showed a positive correlation between illegitimate tasks, effort-reward imbalance, work-family conflict, and turnover intention. Illegitimate tasks can affect intention to quit directly and through two indirect paths: the separate intermediary effect of work-family conflict and the continuous mediating role of effort-reward imbalance and work-family conflict. The results indicate that illegitimate tasks increase employees' intention to quit through the role of effort-reward imbalance and work-family conflict. This study contributes to our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the relationship between illegitimate tasks and workers' turnover intention in the context of Chinese history and culture. Additionally, the findings have implications for reducing attrition rate.

Keywords

References

  1. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Jan;27(1):25-8 [PMID: 16737567]
  2. J Occup Health Psychol. 1996 Jan;1(1):27-41 [PMID: 9547031]
  3. J Occup Health Psychol. 2019 Apr;24(2):241-255 [PMID: 29683712]
  4. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013 May 1;39(3):310-8 [PMID: 23197336]
  5. Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 21;7:1818 [PMID: 27917145]
  6. J Occup Health Psychol. 2000 Jan;5(1):111-26 [PMID: 10658890]
  7. J Nurs Manag. 2008 Sep;16(6):724-33 [PMID: 18808467]
  8. J Occup Health Psychol. 2018 Apr;23(2):248-261 [PMID: 28206790]
  9. Work Stress. 2015 Jan 2;29(1):32-56 [PMID: 25892839]
  10. J Appl Psychol. 1978 Aug;63(4):408-14 [PMID: 701211]
  11. Psychol Rep. 2020 Oct;123(5):1635-1662 [PMID: 31510875]
  12. Emerg Med Int. 2018 Oct 29;2018:3919147 [PMID: 30510802]
  13. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2014;87(7):695-703 [PMID: 24097122]
  14. J Occup Health Psychol. 2000 Apr;5(2):278-308 [PMID: 10784291]
  15. Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 14;7:1410 [PMID: 27683572]
  16. Soc Sci Med. 2004 Apr;58(8):1483-99 [PMID: 14759692]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0tasksillegitimateintentionconflictturnoverimbalancework-familyemployeeseffort-rewardcontextChinaincreaseresultsIllegitimatequitrolehistoricalculturaldevelopingcountriesbecomeimportantsourceworkplacepressureGuidedframeworkstress-as-offense-to-selftheoryexploredtotal474effectivelycompletedonlinesurveyshowedpositivecorrelationcanaffectdirectlytwoindirectpaths:separateintermediaryeffectcontinuousmediatingindicateemployees'studycontributesunderstandingmechanismsunderlyingrelationshipworkers'ChinesehistorycultureAdditionallyfindingsimplicationsreducingattritionrateTasksEmployees'TurnoverIntention:SerialMediationModeleffort–rewardwork–family

Similar Articles

Cited By (6)