Living with a chronic disease: insights from patients with a low socioeconomic status.

Lisa Van Wilder, Peter Pype, Fien Mertens, Elke Rammant, Els Clays, Brecht Devleesschauwer, Pauline Boeckxstaens, Delphine De Smedt
Author Information
  1. Lisa Van Wilder: Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. lisa.vanwilder@ugent.be.
  2. Peter Pype: Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  3. Fien Mertens: Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  4. Elke Rammant: Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  5. Els Clays: Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  6. Brecht Devleesschauwer: Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
  7. Pauline Boeckxstaens: Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  8. Delphine De Smedt: Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about how patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) experience their chronic disease, and how it impacts health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Compared to their more affluent counterparts, worse outcomes have been reported. A better understanding of the domains of HRQoL that are relevant to these specific populations is therefore needed. We explored the experiences of living with a chronic disease in low SES persons.
METHODS: A qualitative interview study was performed in Flanders, Belgium. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in chronically ill patients, selected through purposive sampling. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Analysis followed an inductive and iterative approach.
RESULTS: Fifteen patients were interviewed. Six major themes were identified: a heavy bag to carry, loss of autonomous life, inner and outer loneliness, emotional imbalance, unmet need for support, and coping strategies. Patients experienced their illness as an additional problem on top of all other problems (i.e. financial/social problems, traumatic life events). In general, the disease burden and non-disease burden were mutually reinforcing, resulting in greater dependency, greater risk of social isolation, greater psychological distress, and greater risk of impaired HRQoL.
CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to provide detailed insight into the experiences of living with a chronic disease in low SES persons. A conceptual model is proposed that can be used in daily clinical practice to raise awareness among clinicians and health care providers that the patient's needs go beyond the disease itself. Future research is needed to validate and test the model.

Keywords

References

  1. BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 1;11(2):e041809 [PMID: 33526499]
  2. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Jan 12;14:7 [PMID: 26758624]
  3. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014 Mar;20(3):545-52 [PMID: 24407484]
  4. Am J Hypertens. 2015 Nov;28(11):1295-302 [PMID: 25911639]
  5. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Jun;36(2):152-160 [PMID: 29644927]
  6. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Mar;74(3):763-73 [PMID: 9523418]
  7. J Health Psychol. 2019 Feb;24(2):264-275 [PMID: 27098385]
  8. J Aging Health. 2012 Dec;24(8):1346-63 [PMID: 23006425]
  9. JAMA. 2005 Dec 14;294(22):2879-88 [PMID: 16352796]
  10. Holist Nurs Pract. 1995 Apr;9(3):63-74 [PMID: 7721970]
  11. Can Rev Sociol. 2012 Feb;49(1):50-68 [PMID: 22586837]
  12. Health Psychol Open. 2016 Nov 08;3(2):2055102916678106 [PMID: 28070409]
  13. Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Jan 15;157(2):98-112 [PMID: 12522017]
  14. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 27;20(1):150 [PMID: 32106889]
  15. Gerontologist. 1995 Aug;35(4):498-508 [PMID: 7557520]
  16. PLoS One. 2017 May 10;12(5):e0177210 [PMID: 28489876]
  17. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Dec;83(12 Suppl 2):S10-7 [PMID: 12474167]
  18. Gerontologist. 1990 Jun;30(3):377-84 [PMID: 2354797]
  19. BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 13;19(Suppl 4):551 [PMID: 31196024]
  20. RMD Open. 2020 Oct;6(3): [PMID: 33115768]
  21. Health Psychol Res. 2013 Sep 23;1(3):e27 [PMID: 26973912]
  22. Croat Med J. 2009 Aug;50(4):380-6 [PMID: 19673038]
  23. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 1994 Jan-Feb;15(1):59-66 [PMID: 8119797]
  24. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1996 Jan;18(1):61-5 [PMID: 8666215]
  25. Psychol Aging. 2006 Mar;21(1):140-51 [PMID: 16594799]
  26. J Fam Pract. 2000 Sep;49(9):796-804 [PMID: 11032203]
  27. Value Health. 2017 Apr;20(4):637-643 [PMID: 28408006]
  28. Health Psychol Res. 2015 Oct 19;3(2):2123 [PMID: 26973961]
  29. BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 20;9(3):e023345 [PMID: 30898800]
  30. Milbank Q. 1989;67(3-4):450-84 [PMID: 2534562]
  31. SAGE Open Med. 2020 Apr 20;8:2050312120910350 [PMID: 32341782]
  32. Qual Life Res. 2019 Dec;28(12):3153-3161 [PMID: 31531840]
  33. Soc Sci Med. 2008 Aug;67(3):368-79 [PMID: 18433961]
  34. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;52(10):1237-1246 [PMID: 28646295]
  35. Am Psychol. 2001 Mar;56(3):227-38 [PMID: 11315249]
  36. BMC Med. 2019 Apr 10;17(1):74 [PMID: 30967141]
  37. Sch Inq Nurs Pract. 1992 Spring;6(1):27-40; discussion 41-2 [PMID: 1585085]
  38. J Adv Nurs. 1991 Nov;16(11):1311-9 [PMID: 1753027]
  39. Am J Nurs. 2013 Sep;113(9):28-37; quiz 38 [PMID: 23958674]
  40. Am Sociol Rev. 1982 Dec;47(6):752-64 [PMID: 7171158]
  41. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Apr 25;12:58 [PMID: 24761773]
  42. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018 Oct;19(5):759-769 [PMID: 30155595]
  43. Health Soc Care Community. 2007 Nov;15(6):542-52 [PMID: 17956406]
  44. PLoS One. 2020 Jul 29;15(7):e0236572 [PMID: 32726344]
  45. J Aging Health. 1999 May;11(2):151-68 [PMID: 10558434]
  46. BMC Public Health. 2016 Oct 19;16(1):1098 [PMID: 27760538]
  47. Lancet Public Health. 2020 Mar;5(3):e128-e129 [PMID: 32007133]
  48. Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Sep;64(626):440-1 [PMID: 25179047]
  49. Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51 [PMID: 24979285]
  50. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006 Oct;26(6):695-718 [PMID: 16952717]
  51. J Clin Nurs. 2007 Mar;16(3A):76-83 [PMID: 17518872]
  52. Clin Sci (Lond). 2000 Jul;99(1):1-8 [PMID: 10887052]
  53. J Neurosci Nurs. 1991 Oct;23(5):325-9 [PMID: 1835998]

MeSH Term

Adaptation, Psychological
Chronic Disease
Humans
Qualitative Research
Quality of Life
Social Class

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0diseasepatientslowchroniclifegreaterstatusSESHRQoLmodelsocioeconomicqualityneededexperienceslivingpersonsstudyproblemsburdenriskBACKGROUND:Littleknownexperienceimpactshealth-relatedComparedaffluentcounterpartsworseoutcomesreportedbetterunderstandingdomainsrelevantspecificpopulationsthereforeexploredMETHODS:qualitativeinterviewperformedFlandersBelgiumSemi-structuredinterviewsconductedchronicallyillselectedpurposivesamplingInterviewsaudio-recordedtranscribedverbatimAnalysisfollowedinductiveiterativeapproachRESULTS:FifteeninterviewedSixmajorthemesidentified:heavybagcarrylossautonomousinnerouterlonelinessemotionalimbalanceunmetneedsupportcopingstrategiesPatientsexperiencedillnessadditionalproblemtopiefinancial/socialtraumaticeventsgeneralnon-diseasemutuallyreinforcingresultingdependencysocialisolationpsychologicaldistressimpairedCONCLUSIONS:firstprovidedetailedinsightconceptualproposedcanuseddailyclinicalpracticeraiseawarenessamongclinicianshealthcareproviderspatient'sneedsgobeyondFutureresearchvalidatetestLivingdisease:insightsChronicConceptualHealthinequalitiesHealth-relatedSocioeconomic

Similar Articles

Cited By