Merging the Social Influence Theory and the Goal-Framing Theory to Understand Consumers' Green Purchasing Behavior: Does the Level of Sensitivity to Climate Change Really Matter?

Xianchuan Yang, Yafen Tseng, Beyfen Lee
Author Information
  1. Xianchuan Yang: School of Business, Wuxi Vocational Institute of Commerce, Wuxi, China.
  2. Yafen Tseng: Digital Design and Information Management, Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology, Tainan, Taiwan.
  3. Beyfen Lee: Department of Hospitality Management, Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology, Tainan, Taiwan.

Abstract

This study explored the formation of consumers' green purchasing behavior (GPB) and investigated the moderating effect of sensitivity to climate change (SCC) to address this current knowledge gap. An integrated model merging the Social Influence Theory and the Goal-framing Theory was developed with the Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) paradigm. An empirical study was conducted, surveying 583 respondents and analyzing the questionnaire results using structural equation modeling. The results show that media, family, and peer influence (PEI) can effectively activate the consumers' goal frames. Hedonic and normative goals had significant positive influences on GPB, while gain goals had no significant effect. SCC was found to significantly moderate social influence on GPB through the consumers' goal frames. This research provided strong empirical support on understanding the relationship between social influence and GPB through three goal frames. In addition, the potential differences of the GPB formation process in two subgroups (high SCC and low SCC) are also investigated. The results of this study can help green practitioners develop more effective marketing strategies and incentives targeted to consumers with varying levels of environmental consciousness or sensitivity.

Keywords

References

  1. Behav Res Methods. 2007 Aug;39(3):384-9 [PMID: 17958149]
  2. Sci Total Environ. 2020 Feb 20;704:135275 [PMID: 31796272]
  3. J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903 [PMID: 14516251]
  4. J Abnorm Psychol. 1953 Jan;48(1):78-92 [PMID: 13022199]
  5. Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 24;11:566571 [PMID: 33329200]
  6. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Nov;36(4):717-31 [PMID: 15641418]
  7. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82 [PMID: 3806354]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0GPBSCCTheoryinfluencestudyconsumers'greensensitivityresultsgoalframessocialformationpurchasingbehaviorinvestigatedeffectclimatechangeSocialInfluenceempiricalcangoalssignificantexploredmoderatingaddresscurrentknowledgegapintegratedmodelmergingGoal-framingdevelopedStimulus-Organism-ResponseS-O-Rparadigmconductedsurveying583respondentsanalyzingquestionnaireusingstructuralequationmodelingshowmediafamilypeerPEIeffectivelyactivateHedonicnormativepositiveinfluencesgainfoundsignificantlymoderateresearchprovidedstrongsupportunderstandingrelationshipthreeadditionpotentialdifferencesprocesstwosubgroupshighlowalsohelppractitionersdevelopeffectivemarketingstrategiesincentivestargetedconsumersvaryinglevelsenvironmentalconsciousnessMergingGoal-FramingUnderstandConsumers'GreenPurchasingBehavior:LevelSensitivityClimateChangeReallyMatter?activationabilitygoal-framingtheory

Similar Articles

Cited By (5)