State of the practice of health information systems: a survey study amongst health care professionals in intellectual disability care.

Joep Tummers, Hilde Tobi, Bianca Schalk, Bedir Tekinerdogan, Geraline Leusink
Author Information
  1. Joep Tummers: Information Technology, Wageningen University & Research, Hollandseweg 1, 6701KN, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  2. Hilde Tobi: Biometris, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6706OB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  3. Bianca Schalk: Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  4. Bedir Tekinerdogan: Information Technology, Wageningen University & Research, Hollandseweg 1, 6701KN, Wageningen, The Netherlands. bedir.tekinerdogan@wur.nl.
  5. Geraline Leusink: Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Care for people with an Intellectual Disability (ID) is complex: multiple health care professionals are involved and use different Health Information Systems (HISs) to store medical and daily care information on the same individuals. The objective of this study is to identify the HISs needs of professionals in ID care by addressing the obstacles and challenges they meet in their current HISs.
METHODS: We distributed an online questionnaire amongst Dutch ID care professionals via different professional associations and care providers. 328 respondents answered questions on their HISs. An inventory was made of HIS usage purposes, problems, satisfaction and desired features, with and without stratification on type of HIS and care professional.
RESULTS: Typical in ID care, two types of HISs are being used that differ with respect to their features and users: Electronic Client Dossiers (ECDs) and Electronic Patient Dossiers (EPDs). In total, the respondents mentioned 52 unique HISs. Groups of care professionals differed in their satisfaction with ECDs only. Both HIS types present users with difficulties related to the specifics of care for people with an ID. Particularly the much needed communication between the many unique HISs was reported a major issue which implies major issues with inter-operability. Other problems seem design-related as well.
CONCLUSION: This study can be used to improve current HISs and design new HISs that take ID care professionals requirements into account.

Keywords

References

  1. Comput Inform Nurs. 2017 Jan;35(1):45-53 [PMID: 27575967]
  2. Behav Anal Pract. 2010 Fall;3(2):4-12 [PMID: 22532888]
  3. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Jun;Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-19-W5-21 [PMID: 15659454]
  4. Int J Med Inform. 2010 Dec;79(12):807-16 [PMID: 20961803]
  5. Fam Pract. 2014 Oct;31(5):538-44 [PMID: 25135953]
  6. Glob Health Action. 2014 Jul 31;7:24859 [PMID: 25084834]
  7. BMJ. 2016 Sep 23;354:i4803 [PMID: 27662893]
  8. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jul-Aug;17(4):389-95 [PMID: 20595305]
  9. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Aug 09;13:86 [PMID: 24070335]
  10. Int J Med Inform. 2015 May;84(5):299-307 [PMID: 25683227]
  11. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Apr 14;15:27 [PMID: 25888991]
  12. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015 Mar;139(3):311-8 [PMID: 25724027]
  13. Int J Med Inform. 2006 Mar-Apr;75(3-4):268-81 [PMID: 16169771]
  14. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2009 Apr;47(2):135-46 [PMID: 19368481]
  15. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012 Jun;50(3):243-50 [PMID: 22731973]
  16. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2002 Feb;46(Pt 2):168-78 [PMID: 11869388]
  17. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jan 30;16:12 [PMID: 26831123]
  18. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):984-91 [PMID: 24853066]
  19. Comput Inform Nurs. 2017 Oct;35(10):538-545 [PMID: 28976916]
  20. Int J Med Inform. 2018 Apr;112:74-81 [PMID: 29500025]
  21. Int J Med Inform. 2011 Oct;80(10):708-25 [PMID: 21784701]
  22. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017 Feb 10;2016:2016-2025 [PMID: 28269961]
  23. J Healthc Qual. 2008 Mar-Apr;30(2):37-47 [PMID: 18411891]
  24. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 11;4:CD007492 [PMID: 27065018]
  25. Int J Med Inform. 2008 Jun;77(6):386-98 [PMID: 17964851]
  26. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2012;9:1g [PMID: 22737099]
  27. Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jan;97:266-281 [PMID: 27919385]
  28. Health Inf Manag. 2014;43(3):37-44 [PMID: 27009795]
  29. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Feb;169:51-57 [PMID: 30638591]
  30. Health Informatics J. 2017 Apr 1;:1460458217704244 [PMID: 28434279]
  31. Online J Public Health Inform. 2016 Dec 28;8(3):e204 [PMID: 28210425]
  32. J Med Syst. 2012 Oct;36(5):3141-9 [PMID: 22072279]
  33. Appl Clin Inform. 2011 Jan 26;2(1):18-38 [PMID: 23616858]
  34. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Dec;18(6):1133-9 [PMID: 21883714]
  35. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Nov 01;24(6):1142-1148 [PMID: 29016973]
  36. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Apr 20;17(1):46 [PMID: 28427405]

MeSH Term

Delivery of Health Care
Health Information Systems
Health Personnel
Humans
Intellectual Disability
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0careHISsIDprofessionalshealthinformationstudyHISElectronicpeopledifferentHealthInformationcurrentamongstprofessionalrespondentsproblemssatisfactionfeaturestypesusedDossiersECDsuniquecommunicationmajorBACKGROUND:CareIntellectualDisabilitycomplex:multipleinvolveduseSystemsstoremedicaldailyindividualsobjectiveidentifyneedsaddressingobstacleschallengesmeetMETHODS:distributedonlinequestionnaireDutchviaassociationsproviders328answeredquestionsinventorymadeusagepurposesdesiredwithoutstratificationtypeRESULTS:Typicaltwodifferrespectusers:ClientPatientEPDstotalmentioned52GroupsdifferedpresentusersdifficultiesrelatedspecificsParticularlymuchneededmanyreportedissueimpliesissuesinter-operabilityseemdesign-relatedwellCONCLUSION:canimprovedesignnewtakerequirementsaccountStatepracticesystems:surveyintellectualdisabilityservicesexchangetechnologiesMedicalrecordssystemsQualityimprovement

Similar Articles

Cited By