Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Nationally Representative Sample of Older Internet Users: Cross-sectional Survey.

Gul Seckin, Susan Hughes
Author Information
  1. Gul Seckin: Department of Sociology, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, United States. ORCID
  2. Susan Hughes: Department of Sociology, Ouachita Baptist University, Arkadelphia, AR, United States. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rapid diffusion of the internet has decreased consumer reliance on health care providers for health information and facilitated the patients' ability to be an agent in control of their own health. However, empirical evidence is limited regarding the effects of health-related internet use among older adults, which is complicated by the proliferation of online health and medical sources of questionable scientific accuracy.
OBJECTIVE: We explore the effects of health-related internet use, education, and eHealth literacy on medical encounters and patient-reported outcomes. Patient-reported outcomes are categorized into two dimensions: (1) self-reported health problem and (2) affective distress (feeling worried and anxious) due to information obtained. We were particularly interested in whether education and eHealth literacy moderate the association between perceived strain in medical encounters and patient-reported outcomes.
METHODS: Our study sample consisted of online panel members who have used the internet as a resource for health information, randomly drawn from one of the largest probability-based online research panels. This paper specifically reports results obtained from older panel members (age≥60 years: n=194). First, we examined descriptive statistics and bivariate associations (Pearson correlations and independent samples t tests). We used hierarchical ordinary least squares regression analyses by running separate regressions for each patient-reported outcome. In model 1, we entered the main effects. In model 2, technology and medical encounter variables were included. Model 3 added the statistical interaction terms.
RESULTS: Age (β=-.17; P=.02), gender (β=-.22; P=.01), and medical satisfaction (β=-.28; P=.01) were significant predictors of self-reported health problems. Affective distress was positively predicted by gender (β=.13; P=.05) and satisfaction with medical encounters (β=.34; P<.001) but negatively predicted by education (β=-.18; P=.03) and eHealth literacy (β=-.32; P=.01). The association between experiencing a health problem in relation to health-related internet use and perception of strained medical encounters was greater among respondents with lower levels of education (β=-.55; P=.04). There was also a significant interaction between education and eHealth literacy in predicting the level of affective distress (β=-.60; P=.05), which indicated that higher levels of education predicted lower averages of feeling anxiety and worry despite lower eHealth literacy. Older women reported higher averages of affective distress (β=.13; P=.05), while older men reported higher averages of experiencing a self-reported health problem (β=-.22; P=.01).
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence for the effect of health-related internet use on patient-reported outcomes with implications for medical encounters. The results could be used to guide educational and eHealth literacy interventions for older individuals.

Keywords

References

  1. Gerontologist. 2018 Jul 13;58(4):686-695 [PMID: 28329840]
  2. J Health Commun. 2007 Jan-Feb;12(1):17-28 [PMID: 17365346]
  3. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 27;21(3):e10831 [PMID: 30916666]
  4. J Med Internet Res. 2004 Jun 29;6(2):e21 [PMID: 15249270]
  5. J Rheumatol. 1988 Aug;15(8):1216-22 [PMID: 2972835]
  6. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2018 Jan 11;73(2):248-257 [PMID: 28977575]
  7. J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 25;20(5):e200 [PMID: 29802088]
  8. Gerontologist. 2016 Dec;56(6):990-996 [PMID: 26491035]
  9. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 12;20(2):e47 [PMID: 29434017]
  10. J Health Soc Behav. 2008 Mar;49(1):20-36 [PMID: 18418983]
  11. Gerontologist. 2015 Oct;55(5):854-64 [PMID: 26156518]
  12. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Nov 10;16(11):e225 [PMID: 25386719]
  13. JMIR Aging. 2019 Mar 26;2(1):e11451 [PMID: 31518256]
  14. J Health Commun. 2013;18(6):627-48 [PMID: 23590202]
  15. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2018 Jan 11;73(2):240-247 [PMID: 28977532]
  16. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 09;20(7):e10434 [PMID: 29986848]
  17. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 02;20(10):e10175 [PMID: 30279155]
  18. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2010 Jun;13(3):241-9 [PMID: 20557242]
  19. BMC Geriatr. 2017 Dec 08;17(1):284 [PMID: 29216837]
  20. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun 19;19(6):e218 [PMID: 28630033]
  21. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017 Sep 1;72(5):856-863 [PMID: 27558403]
  22. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 31;20(10):e281 [PMID: 30381283]
  23. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017 Sep 1;72(5):836-845 [PMID: 28073816]
  24. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Feb;84(2):439-48 [PMID: 12585815]
  25. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 13;19(3):e74 [PMID: 28288953]
  26. J Health Soc Behav. 2017 Dec;58(4):503-519 [PMID: 29172762]
  27. JMIR Cardio. 2018 May 30;2(1):e12 [PMID: 31758784]
  28. J Health Soc Behav. 2017 Jun;58(2):147-165 [PMID: 28661778]
  29. Gerontologist. 2018 May 8;58(3):467-477 [PMID: 28201730]
  30. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017 Sep 1;72(5):846-855 [PMID: 28025280]
  31. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jul 11;18(7):e161 [PMID: 27400726]
  32. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Nov 03;13(4):e90 [PMID: 22052161]
  33. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 18;20(10):e277 [PMID: 30341048]
  34. Gerontologist. 2019 Jan 9;59(1):58-68 [PMID: 29688332]
  35. Gerontologist. 2019 Jan 9;59(1):69-77 [PMID: 29790951]
  36. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 03;21(7):e14105 [PMID: 31271145]
  37. Inform Health Soc Care. 2016;41(1):1-19 [PMID: 25710808]
  38. Health Educ Behav. 2015 Apr;42(2):202-9 [PMID: 25156311]
  39. Gerontologist. 2015 Oct;55(5):724-34 [PMID: 25165042]
  40. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jan 06;18(1):e4 [PMID: 26740148]
  41. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 25;21(1):e11481 [PMID: 30681963]
  42. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Apr 24;7(4):e116 [PMID: 29691204]
  43. Int J Med Inform. 2013 Jan;82(1):58-72 [PMID: 22440951]
  44. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 08;21(2):e11129 [PMID: 30735144]
  45. J Health Soc Behav. 2014 Sep;55(3):342-59 [PMID: 25138201]
  46. J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jan 27;14(1):e19 [PMID: 22357448]
  47. Gerontologist. 2017 Oct 1;57(5):955-962 [PMID: 27053506]
  48. N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 25;362(12):1063-6 [PMID: 20335581]
  49. J Med Internet Res. 2012 Nov 08;14(6):e155 [PMID: 23137788]
  50. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 19;19(1):e9 [PMID: 28104579]
  51. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2017 Sep 1;72(5):823-826 [PMID: 28817928]
  52. J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 24;21(5):e11174 [PMID: 31127723]
  53. JMIR Hum Factors. 2019 Apr 21;6(2):e11480 [PMID: 31066696]
  54. Innov Aging. 2019 Jan 11;3(1):igy039 [PMID: 30648160]
  55. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 13;19(10):e334 [PMID: 29030329]
  56. J Health Commun. 2015;20(7):751-8 [PMID: 26054777]
  57. Gerontologist. 2019 Jan 9;59(1):1-5 [PMID: 30629258]
  58. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 11;17(6):e143 [PMID: 26068214]
  59. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jan 15;20(1):e11 [PMID: 29335237]
  60. J Health Commun. 2018;23(9):815-823 [PMID: 30351205]
  61. J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 01;15(8):e148 [PMID: 23906945]
  62. J Med Internet Res. 2006 Sep 29;8(3):e22 [PMID: 17032638]
  63. J Health Commun. 2014;19(1):67-81 [PMID: 24015878]
  64. Am J Mens Health. 2018 Sep;12(5):1358-1367 [PMID: 27193765]
  65. Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jan;72(1):49-53 [PMID: 21129832]
  66. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Aug 17;20(8):e253 [PMID: 30120087]
  67. J Health Soc Behav. 2018 Jun;59(2):170-184 [PMID: 29443620]
  68. J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 10;20(5):e171 [PMID: 29748161]
  69. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 05;19(4):e101 [PMID: 28381394]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthP=medicalβ=-interneteducationeHealthliteracyencountersinformationhealth-relateduseolderpatient-reportedoutcomesdistress01effectsonlineself-reportedproblemaffectiveusedpredictedβ=05lowerhigheraveragesevidenceamong12feelingobtainedassociationstrainstudypanelmembersresultsmodelinteractiongender22satisfactionsignificant13experiencinglevelsOlderreportedBACKGROUND:rapiddiffusiondecreasedconsumerreliancecareprovidersfacilitatedpatients'abilityagentcontrolHoweverempiricallimitedregardingadultscomplicatedproliferationsourcesquestionablescientificaccuracyOBJECTIVE:explorePatient-reportedcategorizedtwodimensions:worriedanxiousdueparticularlyinterestedwhethermoderateperceivedMETHODS:sampleconsistedresourcerandomlydrawnonelargestprobability-basedresearchpanelspaperspecificallyreportsage≥60years:n=194FirstexamineddescriptivestatisticsbivariateassociationsPearsoncorrelationsindependentsamplesttestshierarchicalordinaryleastsquaresregressionanalysesrunningseparateregressionsoutcomeenteredmaintechnologyencountervariablesincludedModel3addedstatisticaltermsRESULTS:Age170228predictorsproblemsAffectivepositively34P<001negatively180332relationperceptionstrainedgreaterrespondents5504alsopredictinglevel60indicatedanxietyworrydespitewomenmenCONCLUSIONS:provideseffectimplicationsguideeducationalinterventionsindividualsPatient-ReportedOutcomesNationallyRepresentativeSampleInternetUsers:Cross-sectionalSurveycommunication

Similar Articles

Cited By