ESSM Position Statement on Surgical Treatment of Peyronie's Disease.

Daniar Osmonov, Ahmed Ragheb, Sam Ward, Gideon Blecher, Marco Falcone, Armin Soave, Roland Dahlem, Koenraad van Renterghem, Nim Christopher, Georgios Hatzichristodoulou, Mirko Preto, Giulio Garaffa, Maarten Albersen, Carlo Bettocchi, Giovanni Corona, Yacov Reisman
Author Information
  1. Daniar Osmonov: Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany. Electronic address: Daniar.osmonov@uksh.de.
  2. Ahmed Ragheb: Department of Urology, Beni-Suef University, Bedaya Fertility & IVF Hospitals, Kairo, Egypt.
  3. Sam Ward: Department of Urology, Clinique Saint Jean, Brussels; Medicis Medical Center, Woluwe, Belgium.
  4. Gideon Blecher: Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne; Department of Urology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
  5. Marco Falcone: Department of Urology, University of Turin - Citt��della Salute e dellaScienza, Turin, Italy.
  6. Armin Soave: Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  7. Roland Dahlem: Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  8. Koenraad van Renterghem: Department of Urology, Jessa Ziekenhuis Campus Salvator, Hasselt, Belgium.
  9. Nim Christopher: The Institute of Urology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
  10. Georgios Hatzichristodoulou: Department of Urology, Hospital N��rnberg, N��rnberg, Germany.
  11. Mirko Preto: Department of Urology, University of Turin - Citt��della Salute e dellaScienza, Turin, Italy.
  12. Giulio Garaffa: The Institute of Urology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.
  13. Maarten Albersen: Department of Urology, UZ Leuven Gasthuisberg Campus, Leuven, Belgium.
  14. Carlo Bettocchi: Department of Urology, University Bari, Bari, Italy.
  15. Giovanni Corona: Endocrinology Unit, Medical Department, AziendaUsl Bologna Maggiore-Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
  16. Yacov Reisman: Flare-Health, Amstelveen, The Netherlands.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patients with Peyronie's disease may experience significat distress. The choice of treatment depends on a variety of factors, including the stage of the disease, the presence of pain, severity and direction of the curvature, penile length and the quality of erectile function.
AIM: To review the evidence associated with surgical treatment of Peyronie`s Disease and provide clinical recommendations on behalf of the European Society for Sexual Medicine. 131 peer-reviewed studies and systematic reviews, which were published from 2009 to 2019 in the English language, were included.
METHODS: MEDLINE, Google Scholar and EMBASE were searched for randomized clinical trials, meta-analyses, open-label prospective and retrospective studies.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The panel provided statements on clinically relevant questions including patient involvement in the decision process, indications for surgery, choice of the approach, and the management of patient expectations. A comparison of the different grafts used in patients who have undergone plaque incision/excision and grafting in order to identify an ideal graft, has been carried out. The prevalence of postoperative complications has been summarized. Levels of evidence were provided according to the Oxford 2011 criteria and Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine recommendations.
RESULTS: In order to allow shared decision making, a patient preoperative counselling regarding the pros and cons of each intervention is recommended. In particular, adverse effects of surgical treatments should be discussed to set realistic understanding and expectations of surgical outcomes and ultimately improve postoperative satisfaction rates. Surgical treatment should be only offered in the chronic phase of the condition, when the deformity and/or degree of erectile dysfunction, prevent patients from engaging in satisfying sexual interaction, or if the deformity is the cause of severe bother.
CONCLUSIONS: Current European Society for Sexual Medicine recommendations cover several aspects of Peyronie's disease treatment. These recommendations aim both to ensure patients and partners have accurate and realistic expectations of their treatment options, as well as to formulate algorithms to guide clinician management pathways. Osmonov D, Ragheb A, Ward S et al, ESSM Position Statement on Surgical Treatment of Peyronie's Disease. Sex Med 2022;10:100459.

Keywords

References

  1. J Sex Med. 2007 Sep;4(5):1500-8 [PMID: 17433088]
  2. BJU Int. 2011 Oct;108(7):1152-6 [PMID: 21314814]
  3. Int Braz J Urol. 2012 Mar-Apr;38(2):242-7; discussion 248-9 [PMID: 22555030]
  4. J Urol. 2001 Jul;166(1):185-8 [PMID: 11435853]
  5. Br J Urol. 1996 May;77(5):733-5 [PMID: 8689121]
  6. J Sex Med. 2006 Sep;3(5):932-937 [PMID: 16805787]
  7. Sex Med Rev. 2019 Apr;7(2):360-368 [PMID: 30078620]
  8. J Sex Med. 2016 Jan;13(1):120-8 [PMID: 26755094]
  9. Eur Urol. 2004 Nov;46(5):610-4; discussion 613-4 [PMID: 15474271]
  10. J Androl. 2007 Jan-Feb;28(1):186-93 [PMID: 16988328]
  11. Int J Impot Res. 2014 Sep-Oct;26(5):182-5 [PMID: 24646675]
  12. J Urol. 2013 Jul;190(1):199-207 [PMID: 23376148]
  13. Urol Int. 2002;69(2):120-4 [PMID: 12187042]
  14. Int J Impot Res. 2020 Jan;32(1):37-42 [PMID: 31383990]
  15. Urology. 2012 Apr;79(4):831-5 [PMID: 22365444]
  16. Int J Impot Res. 2013 May;25(3):109-12 [PMID: 23344164]
  17. J Sex Med. 2018 May;15(5):786-788 [PMID: 29653913]
  18. Int J Impot Res. 2013 Sep;25(5):183-7 [PMID: 23446807]
  19. Urology. 2017 Feb;100:117-124 [PMID: 27825744]
  20. J Urol. 1999 Dec;162(6):2006-9 [PMID: 10569557]
  21. Curr Urol Rep. 2019 Jun 14;20(8):42 [PMID: 31201571]
  22. J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2474-8; discussion 2478 [PMID: 17976656]
  23. Int J Impot Res. 2005 Mar-Apr;17(2):170-4 [PMID: 15215882]
  24. J Urol. 2003 Dec;170(6 Pt 1):2359-62 [PMID: 14634416]
  25. J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):981-4 [PMID: 12576826]
  26. J Sex Med. 2018 Oct;15(10):1506-1513 [PMID: 30177471]
  27. BJU Int. 2002 Mar;89(4):404-8 [PMID: 11872033]
  28. J Urol. 2002 Mar;167(3):1367-70 [PMID: 11832734]
  29. Urology. 2015 Mar;85(3):679-83 [PMID: 25582815]
  30. Urology. 1985 Jun;25(6):582-7 [PMID: 4012950]
  31. J Sex Med. 2008 Sep;5(9):2221-8; discussion 2229-30 [PMID: 18637996]
  32. Eur Urol. 2000 Aug;38(2):167-71 [PMID: 10895008]
  33. J Urol. 2006 Jan;175(1):238-41 [PMID: 16406919]
  34. J Sex Med. 2012 Jan;9(1):316-21 [PMID: 22023552]
  35. Urol Clin North Am. 2011 May;38(2):207-16 [PMID: 21621087]
  36. World J Urol. 2017 Jul;35(7):1119-1124 [PMID: 27864619]
  37. Int J Impot Res. 2016 May;28(3):106-9 [PMID: 27030055]
  38. Int J Impot Res. 2014 Jul-Aug;26(4):156-9 [PMID: 24572996]
  39. Eur Urol. 2010 May;57(5):804-14 [PMID: 20189712]
  40. Int Urol Nephrol. 2002;34(2):223-7 [PMID: 12775100]
  41. BJU Int. 2012 Oct;110(8):1201-5 [PMID: 22313546]
  42. J Urol. 1990 Jan;143(1):80-2 [PMID: 2294269]
  43. J Sex Med. 2008 Sep;5(9):2179-84 [PMID: 18638001]
  44. J Sex Med. 2013 Jan;10(1):120-9 [PMID: 22970798]
  45. J Urol. 1997 Apr;157(4):1288-91 [PMID: 9120923]
  46. J Sex Med. 2005 Jan;2(1):132-8 [PMID: 16422916]
  47. BJU Int. 2014 May;113(5):704-13 [PMID: 24219080]
  48. BJU Int. 2001 Mar;87(4):352-6 [PMID: 11251529]
  49. Sex Med. 2019 Jun;7(2):115-128 [PMID: 30890446]
  50. J Sex Med. 2016 Jun;13(6):905-23 [PMID: 27215686]
  51. J Sex Med. 2018 Oct;15(10):1498-1505 [PMID: 30228083]
  52. J Sex Med. 2010 Jul;7(7):2359-74 [PMID: 20497306]
  53. Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1469-75 [PMID: 19084325]
  54. BJU Int. 2006 Jul;98(1):110-4; discussion 114-5 [PMID: 16831154]
  55. Eur Urol. 2006 Aug;50(2):235-48 [PMID: 16716495]
  56. BJU Int. 2010 Jan;105(2):222-4 [PMID: 19594732]
  57. BJU Int. 2004 Nov;94(7):1147-57 [PMID: 15541152]
  58. J Sex Med. 2008 Nov;5(11):2716-24 [PMID: 18624969]
  59. Curr Urol Rep. 2018 May 17;19(7):51 [PMID: 29774446]
  60. J Sex Med. 2011 Feb;8(2):594-600 [PMID: 21054805]
  61. Transl Androl Urol. 2016 Jun;5(3):334-41 [PMID: 27298780]
  62. Asian J Androl. 2011 Nov;13(6):842-5 [PMID: 21743482]
  63. Andrology. 2018 Nov;6(6):909-915 [PMID: 30076677]
  64. BJU Int. 2016 May;117(5):814-20 [PMID: 26688436]
  65. BJU Int. 2015 May;115(5):822-8 [PMID: 25327685]
  66. Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):129-34 [PMID: 26298209]
  67. J Urol. 2002 Sep;168(3):1075-9 [PMID: 12187226]
  68. J Urol. 2013 Aug;190(2):627-34 [PMID: 23376705]
  69. J Sex Med. 2012 Sep;9(9):2389-95 [PMID: 22429331]
  70. J Urol. 1990 Dec;144(6):1376-9 [PMID: 2231932]
  71. J Sex Med. 2010 Nov;7(11):3775-83 [PMID: 20722782]
  72. J Urol. 2000 Jun;163(6):1704-8 [PMID: 10799165]
  73. J Sex Med. 2015 Jan;12(1):259-64 [PMID: 25345351]
  74. Int J Clin Pract. 2013 Aug;67(8):781-8 [PMID: 23869679]
  75. BJU Int. 2007 Mar;99(3):619-22 [PMID: 17155977]
  76. J Sex Med. 2008 Aug;5(8):1985-90 [PMID: 18554257]
  77. J Sex Med. 2014 Jun;11(6):1593-8 [PMID: 24708140]
  78. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1999 Jun;33(3):181-5 [PMID: 10452294]
  79. Turk J Urol. 2018 Jan;44(1):10-15 [PMID: 29484221]
  80. Nat Rev Urol. 2011 Feb;8(2):95-106 [PMID: 21304544]
  81. Int J Impot Res. 2019 Jul;31(4):263-268 [PMID: 30237548]
  82. Urologe A. 1999 May;38(3):264-9 [PMID: 10407986]
  83. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jan;113(1):254-9 [PMID: 14707644]
  84. Urology. 2014 Nov;84(5):1228-33 [PMID: 25443939]
  85. J Sex Med. 2013 Aug;10(8):2077-83 [PMID: 23679656]
  86. Urology. 2012 Nov;80(5):1051-5 [PMID: 22995568]
  87. J Sex Med. 2012 Sep;9(9):2396-403 [PMID: 22900621]
  88. Urology. 2019 Jul;129:106-112 [PMID: 30954611]
  89. Int J Impot Res. 2019 Jul;31(4):256-262 [PMID: 30194372]
  90. World J Mens Health. 2013 Apr;31(1):1-11 [PMID: 23658860]
  91. Asian J Androl. 2013 May;15(3):391-4 [PMID: 23435473]
  92. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2015 Jul 07;87(2):173-4 [PMID: 26150042]
  93. J Sex Med. 2016 Feb;13(2):277-81 [PMID: 26953837]
  94. Br J Urol. 1994 Oct;74(4):497-500 [PMID: 7820430]
  95. Urol Pract. 2017 Mar;4(2):149-154 [PMID: 37592687]
  96. Urology. 2008 Apr;71(4):698-702 [PMID: 18387398]
  97. J Urol. 2003 May;169(5):1795 [PMID: 12686840]
  98. World J Mens Health. 2021 Jul;39(3):399-405 [PMID: 32648381]
  99. Eur Urol. 2001 Nov;40(5):531-6; discussion 537 [PMID: 11752861]
  100. Urology. 2003 May;61(5):999-1003 [PMID: 12736023]
  101. Int J Impot Res. 2000 Jun;12(3):147-51 [PMID: 11045907]
  102. J Sex Med. 2010 Apr;7(4 Pt 1):1529-37 [PMID: 19912489]
  103. BJU Int. 2004 Jan;93(1):97-9 [PMID: 14678377]
  104. Eur Urol. 2002 May;41(5):551-5 [PMID: 12074798]
  105. Curr Opin Urol. 2011 Nov;21(6):514-8 [PMID: 21897258]
  106. J Sex Med. 2018 Apr;15(4):568-575 [PMID: 29550462]
  107. J Sex Med. 2013 Nov;10(11):2855-60 [PMID: 23210973]
  108. Urology. 2003 Jul;62(1):105-9 [PMID: 12837432]
  109. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2011 Apr;12(6):931-44 [PMID: 21405946]
  110. Urol Ann. 2013 Jul;5(3):167-71 [PMID: 24049379]
  111. BJU Int. 2000 Dec;86(9):1034-8 [PMID: 11119097]
  112. Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):543-52 [PMID: 22658761]
  113. Urol Ann. 2016 Apr-Jun;8(2):218-22 [PMID: 27141196]
  114. Urology. 2001 Apr;57(4):753-7 [PMID: 11306396]
  115. J Urol. 2007 Feb;177(2):589-91 [PMID: 17222639]
  116. J Sex Med. 2010 Mar;7(3):1254-61 [PMID: 20500447]
  117. BJU Int. 2004 Jan;93(1):105-8 [PMID: 14678379]
  118. J Urol. 1994 Oct;152(4):1121-3 [PMID: 8072079]
  119. Urology. 2017 Dec;110:110-113 [PMID: 28886994]
  120. Int Braz J Urol. 2008 Mar-Apr;34(2):191-6; discussion 197 [PMID: 18462517]
  121. J Urol. 2015 Sep;194(3):745-53 [PMID: 26066402]
  122. J Sex Med. 2008 Aug;5(8):1977-84 [PMID: 18564146]
  123. Can Urol Assoc J. 2018 May;12(5):E197-E209 [PMID: 29792593]
  124. J Sex Med. 2018 Feb;15(2):261-269 [PMID: 29275049]
  125. Int J Impot Res. 1998 Jun;10(2):129-31 [PMID: 9647952]
  126. J Urol. 2001 Mar;165(3):825-9 [PMID: 11176479]
  127. J Urol. 1995 Oct;154(4):1362-3 [PMID: 7658538]
  128. J Sex Med. 2013 Mar;10(3):653-60 [PMID: 23153101]
  129. J Sex Med. 2018 Oct;15(10):1491-1497 [PMID: 30195564]
  130. Sex Med. 2019 Mar;7(1):48-53 [PMID: 30552059]
  131. Int J Impot Res. 2018 Nov;30(6):306-311 [PMID: 29973699]
  132. J Sex Med. 2013 Jan;10(1):230-44 [PMID: 23211057]
  133. World J Urol. 2020 Feb;38(2):315-321 [PMID: 31053920]
  134. J Urol. 1997 Jan;157(1):285-90 [PMID: 8976281]
  135. J Sex Med. 2015 Jun;12(6):1474-80 [PMID: 25976337]
  136. J Urol. 2001 Nov;166(5):1769-72; discussion 1772-3 [PMID: 11586221]
  137. J Urol. 2005 Jan;173(1):171-3; discussion 173-4 [PMID: 15592068]
  138. Int J Impot Res. 2000 Oct;12(5):289-93 [PMID: 11424968]
  139. Urology. 2017 Sep;107:144-148 [PMID: 28648967]
  140. J Urol. 1998 May;159(5):1647 [PMID: 9554380]
  141. J Urol. 1965 Feb;93:230-2 [PMID: 14260875]
  142. Eur Urol. 2008 Feb;53(2):432-9 [PMID: 17467161]
  143. Asian J Androl. 2017 May-Jun;19(3):316-320 [PMID: 26806077]
  144. J Sex Med. 2018 Jul;15(7):1021-1029 [PMID: 29802005]
  145. BJU Int. 2010 May;105(10):1440-4 [PMID: 19912195]
  146. Sex Med Rev. 2017 Oct;5(4):544-552 [PMID: 28258933]
  147. J Sex Med. 2007 Nov;4(6):1527-38 [PMID: 17970969]
  148. Int J Impot Res. 1999 Apr;11(2):75-81 [PMID: 10356666]
  149. J Clin Med. 2019 Jul 28;8(8): [PMID: 31357703]
  150. Urology. 1994 Sep;44(3):419-21 [PMID: 8073558]
  151. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2005 Jun;2(6):291-7 [PMID: 16474811]
  152. Int J Impot Res. 2020 Jan;32(1):52-63 [PMID: 31481708]
  153. J Urol. 2013 Mar;189(3):1019-24 [PMID: 23017514]
  154. J Sex Med. 2013 May;10(5):1194-7 [PMID: 23750353]
  155. J Urol. 2002 May;167(5):2066-9 [PMID: 11956440]
  156. J Sex Med. 2011 Jul;8(7):2031-7 [PMID: 21595832]
  157. Int J Impot Res. 2001 Jun;13(3):183-6 [PMID: 11525318]
  158. Asian J Androl. 2013 Jan;15(1):27-34 [PMID: 23178395]
  159. Ther Adv Urol. 2013 Feb;5(1):59-65 [PMID: 23372611]
  160. BJU Int. 2006 Jun;97(6):1353-60 [PMID: 16686744]
  161. Adv Urol. 2012;2012:206284 [PMID: 22956943]
  162. Int J Impot Res. 2010 Nov-Dec;22(6):343-8 [PMID: 21124338]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0Peyronie'streatmentPenileDiseaserecommendationsdiseasesurgicalMedicinepatientexpectationspatientsSurgicalchoiceincludingerectileevidenceclinicalEuropeanSocietySexualstudiesprovideddecisionmanagementorderpostoperativeOxfordrealisticdeformityESSMPositionStatementTreatmentINTRODUCTION:PatientsmayexperiencesignificatdistressdependsvarietyfactorsstagepresencepainseveritydirectioncurvaturepenilelengthqualityfunctionAIM:reviewassociatedPeyronie`sprovidebehalf131peer-reviewedsystematicreviewspublished20092019EnglishlanguageincludedMETHODS:MEDLINEGoogleScholarEMBASEsearchedrandomizedtrialsmeta-analysesopen-labelprospectiveretrospectiveMAINOUTCOMEMEASURE:panelstatementsclinicallyrelevantquestionsinvolvementprocessindicationssurgeryapproachcomparisondifferentgraftsusedundergoneplaqueincision/excisiongraftingidentifyidealgraftcarriedprevalencecomplicationssummarizedLevelsaccording2011criteriaCentreEvidence-BasedRESULTS:allowsharedmakingpreoperativecounsellingregardingprosconsinterventionrecommendedparticularadverseeffectstreatmentsdiscussedsetunderstandingoutcomesultimatelyimprovesatisfactionratesofferedchronicphaseconditionand/ordegreedysfunctionpreventengagingsatisfyingsexualinteractioncauseseverebotherCONCLUSIONS:CurrentcoverseveralaspectsaimensurepartnersaccurateoptionswellformulatealgorithmsguideclinicianpathwaysOsmonovDRaghebWardSetalSexMed202210:100459AcquiredDeviationDisappointmentDissatisfactionInduratioPenisPlasticaGraftLengthProsthesisReconstructionPlication

Similar Articles

Cited By