Self-Reporting of Risk Pathways and Parameter Values for Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Slaughter Cattle from Alternative Production Systems by Kenyan and Ugandan Veterinarians.

Julie Adamchick, Karl M Rich, Andres M Perez
Author Information
  1. Julie Adamchick: Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55108, USA. ORCID
  2. Karl M Rich: Department of Agricultural Economics, Ferguson College of Agriculture, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
  3. Andres M Perez: Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55108, USA.

Abstract

Countries in which disease">disease">foot-and-mouth disease (disease">FMD) is endemic may face bans on the export of disease">FMD-susceptible livestock and products because of the associated risk for transmission of disease">FMD virus. Risk assessment is an essential tool for demonstrating the fitness of one's goods for the international marketplace and for improving animal health. However, it is difficult to obtain the necessary data for such risk assessments in many countries where disease">FMD is present. This study bridged the gaps of traditional participatory and expert elicitation approaches by partnering with veterinarians from the National Veterinary Services of Kenya ( = 13) and Uganda ( = 10) enrolled in an extended capacity-building program to systematically collect rich, local knowledge in a format appropriate for formal quantitative analysis. Participants mapped risk pathways and quantified variables that determine the risk of disease">infection among Cattle at slaughter originating from each of four beef production systems in each country. Findings highlighted that risk processes differ between management systems, that disease and sale are not always independent events, and that events on the risk pathway are influenced by the actions and motivations of value chain actors. The results provide necessary information for evaluating the risk of disease">FMD among Cattle pre-harvest in Kenya and Uganda and provide a framework for similar evaluation in other endemic settings.

Keywords

References

  1. Vet Rec. 2007 Feb 17;160(7):238-41 [PMID: 17308024]
  2. Prev Vet Med. 2013 Nov 1;112(3-4):161-73 [PMID: 23958457]
  3. Risk Anal. 2014 Jul;34(7):1228-39 [PMID: 24989791]
  4. Glob Food Sec. 2020 Sep;26:100445 [PMID: 33324536]
  5. Risk Anal. 2010 May;30(5):766-81 [PMID: 20409042]
  6. Prev Vet Med. 2014 Sep 1;116(1-2):63-74 [PMID: 24974081]
  7. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2021 Jul;68(4):1966-1978 [PMID: 33174371]
  8. Risk Anal. 2017 Dec;37(12):2350-2359 [PMID: 28334452]
  9. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2018 Aug;65(4):1067-1077 [PMID: 29575643]
  10. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2010 Jun;57(3):115-34 [PMID: 20569417]
  11. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017 Apr;64(2):316-332 [PMID: 25996568]
  12. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2015 Apr;47(4):691-7 [PMID: 25700674]
  13. Front Vet Sci. 2018 Oct 02;5:230 [PMID: 30333985]
  14. Environ Health. 2010 Apr 26;9:19 [PMID: 20420657]
  15. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2021 Nov;68(6):3463-3473 [PMID: 33295097]
  16. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2020 Sep 10;13:55 [PMID: 32944257]
  17. Prev Vet Med. 2013 Apr 1;109(1-2):1-9 [PMID: 23270791]
  18. Risk Anal. 2011 Sep;31(9):1345-55 [PMID: 21913949]
  19. Prev Vet Med. 2021 May;190:105315 [PMID: 33735817]
  20. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 17;12(1):e0169198 [PMID: 28095472]
  21. Prev Vet Med. 2019 Jan 1;162:56-66 [PMID: 30621899]
  22. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2012 Sep;44 Suppl 1:S33-40 [PMID: 22886443]
  23. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Sep 27;364(1530):2657-67 [PMID: 19687036]
  24. Prev Vet Med. 2011 Sep 1;101(3-4):133-47 [PMID: 20828844]
  25. Rev Sci Tech. 2017 Apr;36(1):163-174 [PMID: 28926018]
  26. Prev Vet Med. 2015 Nov 1;122(1-2):61-9 [PMID: 26427634]
  27. Prev Vet Med. 2016 Sep 15;132:67-82 [PMID: 27664449]
  28. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Nov;34(11):1161-1172 [PMID: 27364887]
  29. Am J Vet Res. 2008 Feb;69(2):252-60 [PMID: 18241023]
  30. Prev Vet Med. 2018 Oct 1;158:160-168 [PMID: 30220390]
  31. Rev Sci Tech. 2012 Dec;31(3):761-75 [PMID: 23520731]
  32. Prev Vet Med. 2020 Jan;174:104823 [PMID: 31734519]
  33. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2013 Jan;45(1):35-43 [PMID: 22956440]
  34. Risk Anal. 2021 Feb 24;: [PMID: 33629402]
  35. Front Vet Sci. 2019 Mar 19;6:78 [PMID: 30941355]
  36. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2010 Oct;42(7):1547-59 [PMID: 20526861]
  37. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2008;55(1):73-87 [PMID: 18397510]
  38. J Food Prot. 2018 Apr;81(4):684-691 [PMID: 29557673]
  39. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2019 Sep;66(5):2011-2024 [PMID: 31127983]
  40. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2017 Aug;64(4):1079-1094 [PMID: 27167976]
  41. Prev Vet Med. 2019 Nov 1;171:104766 [PMID: 31541845]
  42. Infect Dis Poverty. 2016 Feb 25;5:17 [PMID: 26916067]
  43. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2013 Dec;60(6):507-15 [PMID: 24148092]
  44. Front Vet Sci. 2018 May 02;5:94 [PMID: 29770325]
  45. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22998 [PMID: 21829574]
  46. Zoonoses Public Health. 2017 Mar;64(2):156-160 [PMID: 27362859]
  47. Front Vet Sci. 2021 Oct 25;8:729159 [PMID: 34760954]
  48. Rev Sci Tech. 2007 Dec;26(3):537-49 [PMID: 18293603]
  49. Med Decis Making. 2006 Sep-Oct;26(5):434-46 [PMID: 16997923]
  50. Foods. 2021 Sep 22;10(10): [PMID: 34681293]
  51. Ecohealth. 2020 Sep;17(3):381-387 [PMID: 33057835]
  52. Rev Sci Tech. 2017 Apr;36(1):67-76 [PMID: 28926027]
  53. Agric Syst. 2017 Mar;152:1-17 [PMID: 28260829]
  54. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2012 Oct 22;12:23 [PMID: 23088820]
  55. Nature. 2015 Oct 15;526(7573):317-8 [PMID: 26469026]

MeSH Term

Abattoirs
Animals
Cattle
Cattle Diseases
Foot-and-Mouth Disease
Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus
Humans
Kenya
Self Report
Uganda
Veterinarians

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0riskFMDdiseaseKenyaUgandafoot-and-mouthendemicRiskassessmentnecessaryparticipatoryexpertelicitation=amongcattlesystemseventsprovideCountriesmayfacebansexportFMD-susceptiblelivestockproductsassociatedtransmissionvirusessentialtooldemonstratingfitnessone'sgoodsinternationalmarketplaceimprovinganimalhealthHoweverdifficultobtaindataassessmentsmanycountriespresentstudybridgedgapstraditionalapproachespartneringveterinariansNationalVeterinaryServices1310enrolledextendedcapacity-buildingprogramsystematicallycollectrichlocalknowledgeformatappropriateformalquantitativeanalysisParticipantsmappedpathwaysquantifiedvariablesdetermineinfectionslaughteroriginatingfourbeefproductioncountryFindingshighlightedprocessesdiffermanagementsalealwaysindependentpathwayinfluencedactionsmotivationsvaluechainactorsresultsinformationevaluatingpre-harvestframeworksimilarevaluationsettingsSelf-ReportingPathwaysParameterValuesFoot-and-MouthDiseaseSlaughterCattleAlternativeProductionSystemsKenyanUgandanVeterinariansmethods

Similar Articles

Cited By (5)