Challenging the clinically-situated emotion-deficient version of empathy within medicine and medical education research.

Barret Michalec, Frederic W Hafferty
Author Information
  1. Barret Michalec: Arizona State University, Phoenix, USA.
  2. Frederic W Hafferty: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.

Abstract

In this paper, we argue that the notion of a clinically-situated empathy (e.g. physician empathy), is potentially problematic as it perpetuates an emotion-deficient version of empathy within medicine and medicine education research. Utilizing classic and contemporary empathy theory from various social science disciplines, we discuss how empathy in the general sense differs conceptually from clinically-situated empathy-paying particular attention to the role of emotional contagion. To highlight this contrast, we draw upon Hojat et al.'s model of physician empathy and how this body of work reflects broader medical-cultural norms that problematize the role and impact of emotions within the clinical encounter. Alternatively, we present a more encompassing model of empathy drawing upon the fields of social-psychology and social-neuroscience in order to bring the notion of "feeling with" and emotional contagion more specifically, into medical education, medical education research, and medicine more generally.

Keywords

References

  1. J Hist Behav Sci. 2005 Spring;41(2):151-63 [PMID: 15812816]
  2. Curr Opin Psychol. 2018 Dec;24:15-20 [PMID: 29609059]
  3. Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Feb;39(2):339-342 [PMID: 32011932]
  4. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Sep;76(3):307-22 [PMID: 19631488]
  5. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Aug;18(8):498-509 [PMID: 28655877]
  6. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Sep;80:99-114 [PMID: 28506927]
  7. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Oct;10(10):435-41 [PMID: 16949331]
  8. Soc Sci Med. 2020 Apr;251:112904 [PMID: 32151886]
  9. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Apr;52(4):749-58 [PMID: 3572736]
  10. Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Oct;165(10):1261 [PMID: 18829882]
  11. J Patient Exp. 2017 Jun;4(2):64-68 [PMID: 28725863]
  12. JAMA. 2005 Mar 2;293(9):1100-6 [PMID: 15741532]
  13. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:279-300 [PMID: 17550343]
  14. Novartis Found Symp. 2007;278:71-80; discussion 80-96, 216-21 [PMID: 17214311]
  15. Med Health Care Philos. 2014 May;17(2):301-11 [PMID: 24343367]
  16. Soc Sci Med. 2016 Jul;160:94-101 [PMID: 27227696]
  17. Hum Dev. 1977;20(5):253-76 [PMID: 908556]
  18. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016 Mar;21(1):235-49 [PMID: 25597025]
  19. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Apr;66(4):776-97 [PMID: 8189352]
  20. Neuroimage. 2010 May 1;50(4):1676-82 [PMID: 20080194]
  21. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 May;21(5):524-30 [PMID: 16704404]
  22. Lancet. 2009 Jun 6;373(9679):1940-1 [PMID: 19514114]
  23. Acad Med. 2011 Mar;86(3):326-32 [PMID: 21248595]
  24. Acad Med. 2020 Jun;95(6):947-957 [PMID: 31688037]
  25. Acad Med. 2020 Jun;95(6):911-918 [PMID: 31977341]
  26. Acad Med. 1994 Nov;69(11):861-71 [PMID: 7945681]
  27. J Occup Health Psychol. 2002 Jan;7(1):57-67 [PMID: 11827234]
  28. Behav Brain Sci. 2002 Feb;25(1):1-20; discussion 20-71 [PMID: 12625087]
  29. Science. 2012 May 18;336(6083):874-6 [PMID: 22605767]
  30. Health (London). 2012 May;16(3):267-81 [PMID: 21602249]
  31. Acad Med. 2009 Sep;84(9):1182-91 [PMID: 19707055]
  32. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. 2004 Jun;3(2):71-100 [PMID: 15537986]
  33. Behav Brain Res. 2014 Apr 15;263:16-21 [PMID: 24480421]
  34. Am J Med. 2020 May;133(5):561-566 [PMID: 31954114]
  35. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Jan 14;8:457 [PMID: 25642175]
  36. Biopsychosoc Med. 2007 Nov 16;1:22 [PMID: 18021398]
  37. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Mar;1156:81-96 [PMID: 19338504]
  38. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2020 May;24(2):141-162 [PMID: 31771425]
  39. Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Sep;159(9):1563-9 [PMID: 12202278]
  40. Med Educ. 2013 Jan;47(1):71-9 [PMID: 23278827]
  41. Med Educ. 2002 Jun;36(6):522-7 [PMID: 12047665]
  42. Acad Med. 2013 Aug;88(8):1171-7 [PMID: 23807099]
  43. Med Educ. 2016 Mar;50(3):300-10 [PMID: 26896015]
  44. J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Aug;18(8):670-4 [PMID: 12911651]
  45. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018 Dec;23(5):899-920 [PMID: 29968006]
  46. Acad Med. 2021 Jan 1;96(1):142-154 [PMID: 32769475]
  47. Perspect Med Educ. 2020 Apr;9(2):111-116 [PMID: 32026318]
  48. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001 Jan;42(1):3-48 [PMID: 11205623]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0empathymedicineeducationclinically-situatedwithinresearchmedicalnotionphysicianemotion-deficientversionroleemotionalcontagionuponmodelpaperargueegpotentiallyproblematicperpetuatesUtilizingclassiccontemporarytheoryvarioussocialsciencedisciplinesdiscussgeneralsensediffersconceptuallyempathy-payingparticularattentionhighlightcontrastdrawHojatetal'sbodyworkreflectsbroadermedical-culturalnormsproblematizeimpactemotionsclinicalencounterAlternativelypresentencompassingdrawingfieldssocial-psychologysocial-neuroscienceorderbring"feelingwith"specificallygenerallyChallengingEmotionalContagionEmpathyMedicalEducationMedicine

Similar Articles

Cited By