Social Media and Clinical Research in Dermatology.

Ryan Geist, Michelle Militello, J Mark Albrecht, Colby L Presley, Jaclyn B Anderson, Melissa Laughter, Chandler W Rundle
Author Information
  1. Ryan Geist: College of Osteopathic Medicine, Rocky Vista University, Ivins, UT USA.
  2. Michelle Militello: College of Osteopathic Medicine, Rocky Vista University, Parker, CO USA.
  3. J Mark Albrecht: School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA.
  4. Colby L Presley: Division of Dermatology, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA USA.
  5. Jaclyn B Anderson: Department of Medicine, University of Texas, Austin, TX USA.
  6. Melissa Laughter: Department of Medicine, University of Texas, Austin, TX USA.
  7. Chandler W Rundle: Department of Dermatology, Duke University Hospital, 40 Duke Medicine Circle Clinic 3K, Durham, NC 27710 USA. ORCID

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The immense growth of social media has afforded new opportunities in dermatology clinical research. This review serves to outline how social media has impacted clinical research and to explore future avenues for which social media can make a significant impact in dermatology clinical research.
RECENT FINDINGS: Recent clinical trials augmented by social media have demonstrated increased participant enrollment, shortened recruitment timelines, and decreased recruitment cost. The incorporation of social media into clinical research has also afforded greater access to teledermatology and the initiation of virtual clinical trials.
SUMMARY: Clinical research serves as a primary source of evidence for refining healthcare practices by expanding the understanding of patient demographics, methods for improving patient care, and new therapeutic discoveries. Since its initiation, social media has played an integral and ever-expanding role in clinical research.

Keywords

References

  1. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 28;19(8):e290 [PMID: 28851679]
  2. Dermatology. 2020;236(4):375-382 [PMID: 32126560]
  3. Dermatol Online J. 2018 Feb 15;24(2): [PMID: 29630149]
  4. Trials. 2014 Aug 16;15:326 [PMID: 25128185]
  5. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1911528 [PMID: 31532517]
  6. J Invest Dermatol. 2021 Mar;141(3):676-678 [PMID: 32805216]
  7. Clin Dermatol. 2021 Jan-Feb;39(1):104-106 [PMID: 33972036]
  8. J Invest Dermatol. 2019 Aug;139(8):1626-1633.e1 [PMID: 31331443]
  9. JAMA. 2020 Mar 3;323(9):844-853 [PMID: 32125404]
  10. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 19;13(4):e123 [PMID: 22173204]
  11. Arch Dermatol. 2004 Dec;140(12):1520-3 [PMID: 15611433]
  12. Am Psychol. 2015 Sep;70(6):543-56 [PMID: 26348336]
  13. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 17;11(2):e0148257 [PMID: 26886730]
  14. J Oncol Pract. 2013 Nov;9(6):267-76 [PMID: 24130252]
  15. Clin Trials. 2015 Feb;12(1):77-83 [PMID: 25475878]
  16. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2019 May;44(5):148-172 [PMID: 30545650]
  17. JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jun 1;2(6):822-3 [PMID: 26940041]
  18. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 May 13;20(1):116 [PMID: 32404050]
  19. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Aug 24;20(8):e10351 [PMID: 30143479]
  20. NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Jul 31;3:101 [PMID: 32821856]
  21. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 14;22(8):e19389 [PMID: 32795986]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0mediaclinicalresearchsocialClinicaltrialsaffordednewdermatologyservesrecruitmentinitiationpatientSocialPURPOSEOFREVIEW:immensegrowthopportunitiesreviewoutlineimpactedexplorefutureavenuescanmakesignificantimpactRECENTFINDINGS:RecentaugmenteddemonstratedincreasedparticipantenrollmentshortenedtimelinesdecreasedcostincorporationalsogreateraccessteledermatologyvirtualSUMMARY:primarysourceevidencerefininghealthcarepracticesexpandingunderstandingdemographicsmethodsimprovingcaretherapeuticdiscoveriesSinceplayedintegralever-expandingroleMediaResearchDermatologyFacebookTwitter

Similar Articles

Cited By