Developing global guidance on human milk banking.

Mirriam Tyebally Fang, Efstratios Chatzixiros, Laurence Grummer-Strawn, Cyril Engmann, Kiersten Israel-Ballard, Kimberly Mansen, Deborah L O'Connor, Sharon Unger, Marisa Herson, Gillian Weaver, Nikola Biller-Andorno
Author Information
  1. Mirriam Tyebally Fang: Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 30, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.
  2. Efstratios Chatzixiros: Department of Health Product Policy and Standards, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  3. Laurence Grummer-Strawn: Department of Nutrition and Food Safety, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  4. Cyril Engmann: PATH, Seattle, United States of America.
  5. Kiersten Israel-Ballard: PATH, Seattle, United States of America.
  6. Kimberly Mansen: PATH, Seattle, United States of America.
  7. Deborah L O'Connor: Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  8. Sharon Unger: Sinai Health, Toronto, Canada.
  9. Marisa Herson: School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
  10. Gillian Weaver: Human Milk Foundation, Harpenden, England.
  11. Nikola Biller-Andorno: Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 30, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.

Abstract

Donor human milk is recommended by the World Health Organization both for its advantageous nutritional and biological properties when mother's own milk is not available and for its recognized support for lactation and breastfeeding when used appropriately. An increasing number of human milk banks are being established around the world, especially in low- and middle-income countries, to facilitate the collection, processing and distribution of donor human milk. In contrast to other medical products of human origin, however, there are no minimum quality, safety and ethical standards for donor human milk and no coordinating global body to inform national policies. We present the key issues impeding progress in human milk banking, including the lack of clear definitions or registries of products; issues around regulation, quality and safety; and ethical concerns about commercialization and potential exploitation of women. Recognizing that progress in human milk banking is limited by a lack of comparable evidence, we recommend further research in this field to fill the knowledge gaps and provide evidence-based guidance. We also highlight the need for optimal support for mothers to provide their own breastmilk and establish breastfeeding as soon as and wherever possible after birth.

References

  1. J Hum Lact. 2009 May;25(2):211-9 [PMID: 19414823]
  2. Bioethics. 2012 Mar;26(3):117-27 [PMID: 21091982]
  3. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Jul;4(7):484-485 [PMID: 32573440]
  4. Eur J Pediatr. 2021 Jul 3;: [PMID: 34216269]
  5. Breastfeed Med. 2019 Apr;14(3):193-202 [PMID: 30916575]
  6. Int Breastfeed J. 2021 Mar 29;16(1):29 [PMID: 33781285]
  7. World Rev Nutr Diet. 2014;110:215-27 [PMID: 24751632]
  8. Curr Dev Nutr. 2018 May 31;2(7):nzy025 [PMID: 30087951]
  9. Front Pediatr. 2018 Oct 31;6:324 [PMID: 30430103]
  10. J Nutr. 2019 Mar 1;149(3):497-504 [PMID: 30770541]
  11. J Hum Lact. 2021 Feb;37(1):71-75 [PMID: 32735470]
  12. Clin Perinatol. 2017 Mar;44(1):131-149 [PMID: 28159201]
  13. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 08;(5):CD000343 [PMID: 27155888]
  14. Front Pediatr. 2019 Mar 04;7:53 [PMID: 30886837]
  15. Clin Perinatol. 2017 Mar;44(1):1-22 [PMID: 28159199]
  16. Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Nov;7(11):e1484-e1486 [PMID: 31607455]
  17. Breastfeed Med. 2018 Oct;13(8):524-526 [PMID: 30335484]
  18. PLoS One. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0210610 [PMID: 30682200]
  19. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 29;9:CD006170 [PMID: 27684560]
  20. J Hum Lact. 1998 Jun;14(2):157-9 [PMID: 9775849]
  21. J Hum Lact. 2021 Feb;37(1):76-86 [PMID: 32833551]
  22. Nutrients. 2016 Aug 02;8(8): [PMID: 27490567]
  23. J Hum Lact. 1998 Dec;14(4):333-5 [PMID: 10205454]
  24. J Hum Lact. 2009 May;25(2):206-10 [PMID: 19414822]
  25. Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Feb;9(2):e104-e105 [PMID: 33482138]
  26. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017 Mar;64(3):353-361 [PMID: 27755345]
  27. J Perinatol. 2017 May;37(5):469-474 [PMID: 27831549]
  28. Matern Child Nutr. 2019 Oct;15(4):e12842 [PMID: 31099159]
  29. Breastfeed Med. 2018 Sep;13(7):465-472 [PMID: 30148655]
  30. Front Pediatr. 2021 Feb 03;8:633700 [PMID: 33614547]
  31. Front Pediatr. 2019 Mar 22;7:76 [PMID: 30968003]
  32. J Hum Lact. 2018 Feb;34(1):120-129 [PMID: 28614672]

Grants

  1. 001/World Health Organization

MeSH Term

Breast Feeding
Female
Humans
Milk Banks
Milk, Human
Mothers
Tissue Donors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0humanmilkbankingsupportbreastfeedingarounddonorproductsqualitysafetyethicalglobalissuesprogresslackprovideguidanceDonorrecommendedWorldHealthOrganizationadvantageousnutritionalbiologicalpropertiesmother'savailablerecognizedlactationusedappropriatelyincreasingnumberbanksestablishedworldespeciallylow-middle-incomecountriesfacilitatecollectionprocessingdistributioncontrastmedicaloriginhoweverminimumstandardscoordinatingbodyinformnationalpoliciespresentkeyimpedingincludingcleardefinitionsregistriesregulationconcernscommercializationpotentialexploitationwomenRecognizinglimitedcomparableevidencerecommendresearchfieldfillknowledgegapsevidence-basedalsohighlightneedoptimalmothersbreastmilkestablishsoonwhereverpossiblebirthDeveloping

Similar Articles

Cited By