Does religion predict coronavirus conspiracy beliefs? Centrality of religiosity, religious fundamentalism, and COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs.

Paweł Łowicki, Marta Marchlewska, Zuzanna Molenda, Adam Karakula, Dagmara Szczepańska
Author Information
  1. Paweł Łowicki: Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
  2. Marta Marchlewska: Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
  3. Zuzanna Molenda: Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
  4. Adam Karakula: Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
  5. Dagmara Szczepańska: Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.

Abstract

There has been an increasing interest in the relationship between religion and psychosocial functioning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interestingly, emerging recent findings suggest that religiousness may have a Janus-face impact on how people cope with the pandemic, leading to both positive and negative social outcomes. In this project, we examine whether two types of religiousness (i.e., centrality of religiosity and religious fundamentalism) are associated with COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and socially undesirable behavior during the pandemic. We suggest that only the most dogmatic and fundamentalistic type of religiousness could lead to conspiracy beliefs, while centrality of religiosity could be unrelated or even negatively related to this type of thinking. In a series of two studies ( = 361 and  = 394) conducted among Polish Roman Catholics, we demonstrate that religious fundamentalism, unlike centrality of religiosity, is positively related to coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, which, in turn, promote socially maladaptive behavior such as freeriding or non-adherence to safety guidelines.

Keywords

References

  1. J Soc Psychol. 2019;159(6):766-779 [PMID: 30870100]
  2. Pers Individ Dif. 2020 Nov 1;166:110199 [PMID: 32565591]
  3. Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 03;9:2399 [PMID: 30559697]
  4. Psychiatry Res. 2020 Dec;294:113540 [PMID: 33142144]
  5. Psychol Health Med. 2021 Jan;26(1):1-12 [PMID: 32479113]
  6. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 May;36(5):715-25 [PMID: 20348439]
  7. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2020 Dec;12(4):1270-1285 [PMID: 32864837]
  8. PLoS One. 2016 Apr 07;11(4):e0153039 [PMID: 27054566]
  9. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Dec;67(6):1049-62 [PMID: 7815301]
  10. Curr Opin Psychol. 2021 Aug;40:67-72 [PMID: 33022519]
  11. Int J Psychol. 2021 Apr;56(2):216-227 [PMID: 32617973]
  12. Br J Soc Psychol. 2019 Oct;58(4):938-954 [PMID: 30706498]
  13. Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jun;100:18-25 [PMID: 28392301]
  14. Br J Soc Psychol. 2022 Apr;61(2):532-549 [PMID: 34462919]
  15. Soc Sci Med. 2020 Oct;263:113356 [PMID: 32967786]
  16. Psychol Med. 2022 Apr;52(5):824-833 [PMID: 32571438]
  17. ISRN Psychiatry. 2012 Dec 16;2012:278730 [PMID: 23762764]
  18. Front Psychol. 2013 Jul 16;4:424 [PMID: 23882235]
  19. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Jun;46(6):856-868 [PMID: 31610740]
  20. Psychol Men Masc. 2011 Oct;12(4):383-400 [PMID: 22081759]
  21. Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 27;9:285 [PMID: 29636709]
  22. Scand J Psychol. 2017 Oct;58(5):422-428 [PMID: 28782805]
  23. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Nov;13(6):770-788 [PMID: 30231213]
  24. Br J Psychol. 2016 Aug;107(3):556-76 [PMID: 26511288]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0conspiracybeliefsreligiosityCOVID-19fundamentalismpandemicreligiousnesscentralityreligiousreligionsuggesttwosociallybehaviortyperelatedcoronavirussafetyguidelinesCentralityincreasinginterestrelationshippsychosocialfunctioningInterestinglyemergingrecentfindingsmayJanus-faceimpactpeoplecopeleadingpositivenegativesocialoutcomesprojectexaminewhethertypesieassociatedundesirabledogmaticfundamentalisticleadunrelatedevennegativelythinkingseriesstudies = 361 = 394conductedamongPolishRomanCatholicsdemonstrateunlikepositivelyturnpromotemaladaptivefreeridingnon-adherencepredictbeliefs?ConspiracyFreeridingNon-adherenceReligiousReligiousness

Similar Articles

Cited By