Personality Characteristics and Emotional Distress Among Chinese Pregnant Women: A Moderated Mediation Model.

Wenjiao Yang, Yanfei Hou, Yu Chen, Wenting Liu, Fan Fang, Julan Xiao, Jing Wang
Author Information
  1. Wenjiao Yang: School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  2. Yanfei Hou: School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  3. Yu Chen: School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  4. Wenting Liu: School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  5. Fan Fang: School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  6. Julan Xiao: School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  7. Jing Wang: School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that certain personality characteristics are associated with emotional distress during pregnancy. However, the underlying mechanism of this association is rarely understood. The current study investigated the links between personality and pregnant women's emotional distress (depressive and anxiety symptoms), tested the chain mediating effects of two resilience factors-social support and positive coping, and explored whether socioeconomic status (SES) could moderate the effects (including direct and/or indirect effects) of personality on their emotional distress. Results of a relatively large sample of pregnant women in China ( = 1157) showed positive associations for psychoticism and neuroticism with depressive and anxiety symptoms as well as negative associations for extraversion with depression and anxiety. After controlling for four important variables (the first pregnancy or not, having adverse pregnancy experience or not, being pregnant as planned or not, and number of weeks of pregnancy), social support and positive coping acted as chain mediators on the associations of personality with depressive symptoms as well as of personality with anxiety. Overall, the association of personality and depressive symptoms demonstrated invariance across socioeconomic status (SES). However, SES moderated the relationship between personality and anxiety. Specifically, the negative association of positive coping with anxiety symptoms was weaker for low SES women than for high SES ones. Results highlight the importance of social support and positive coping to decrease personality-related depressive and anxiety symptom among pregnant women. Furthermore, identifying other resilience factors that alleviate anxiety in women with low SES is urgently called for.

Keywords

References

  1. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019 Jan/Feb;34(1):76-84 [PMID: 30303892]
  2. JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jul 6;1(3):e180725 [PMID: 30646025]
  3. J Pers Assess. 2021 May-Jun;103(3):406-415 [PMID: 32216599]
  4. J Affect Disord. 2015 Apr 1;175:53-65 [PMID: 25594512]
  5. Psychol Bull. 1985 Sep;98(2):310-57 [PMID: 3901065]
  6. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Feb;88(2):386-99 [PMID: 15841865]
  7. World Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;19(3):336-337 [PMID: 32931120]
  8. Eur Psychiatry. 2015 Sep;30(6):701-8 [PMID: 26141375]
  9. BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Apr 02;15:66 [PMID: 25879965]
  10. Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 05;10:1321 [PMID: 31231288]
  11. Restor Dent Endod. 2013 Feb;38(1):52-4 [PMID: 23495371]
  12. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:745-74 [PMID: 14744233]
  13. J Affect Disord. 2019 May 1;250:57-64 [PMID: 30831542]
  14. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jul;113(1):144-166 [PMID: 28287753]
  15. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 10;10:927 [PMID: 31998151]
  16. J Psychosom Res. 2020 Sep;136:110192 [PMID: 32721776]
  17. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021 Mar;67(2):120-127 [PMID: 32643510]
  18. Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):879-91 [PMID: 18697684]
  19. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2020 Oct;208(10):764-770 [PMID: 32740144]
  20. Br J Psychiatry. 2017 May;210(5):315-323 [PMID: 28302701]
  21. Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 08;7:847 [PMID: 27375526]
  22. BMC Public Health. 2018 Feb 13;18(1):250 [PMID: 29439681]
  23. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 14;17(10): [PMID: 32423166]
  24. BMC Public Health. 2013 Jun 02;13:532 [PMID: 23724872]
  25. J Affect Disord. 2020 Mar 1;264:201-205 [PMID: 32056751]
  26. Int J Womens Health. 2019 Apr 10;11:241-248 [PMID: 31114392]
  27. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;28(2):257-280 [PMID: 29948234]
  28. World Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;19(3):313-327 [PMID: 32931106]
  29. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Dec;59(6):1216-29 [PMID: 2283588]
  30. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2014 Apr;17(2):145-54 [PMID: 24240635]
  31. Women Birth. 2019 Feb;32(1):e138-e143 [PMID: 29887508]
  32. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2019 Jun;22(3):349-355 [PMID: 30069707]
  33. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jul 21;16(1):180 [PMID: 27439302]
  34. J Hum Lact. 2019 Feb;35(1):49-58 [PMID: 29969342]
  35. World Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;19(3):331-332 [PMID: 32931095]
  36. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 13;10(8):e0135809 [PMID: 26270035]
  37. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Dec;41(4):290-297 [PMID: 31619093]
  38. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2007 Feb;10(1):25-32 [PMID: 17187166]
  39. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;3(10):973-982 [PMID: 27650773]
  40. Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 12;10:1625 [PMID: 31354598]
  41. Child Abuse Negl. 2021 Jan;111:104802 [PMID: 33218712]
  42. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Mar;50(3):571-9 [PMID: 3701593]
  43. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 May;291(5):999-1003 [PMID: 25311200]
  44. J Affect Disord. 2016 Feb;191:62-77 [PMID: 26650969]
  45. Psychosomatics. 1971 Nov-Dec;12(6):371-9 [PMID: 5172928]
  46. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 14;17(22): [PMID: 33202688]
  47. J Health Psychol. 2022 Mar;27(4):868-878 [PMID: 33153340]
  48. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Feb;303(2):463-469 [PMID: 33009997]
  49. Stress Health. 2019 Apr;35(2):217-224 [PMID: 30609225]
  50. Women Health. 2019 Jan;59(1):41-54 [PMID: 29400638]
  51. Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 22;7:1794 [PMID: 27920734]
  52. J Affect Disord. 2005 Apr;85(3):323-6 [PMID: 15780702]
  53. J Marriage Fam. 2015 Aug;77(4):844-865 [PMID: 26339102]
  54. Br Dent J. 2020 Nov;229(9):605-614 [PMID: 33188344]
  55. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2017 Oct;20(5):695-701 [PMID: 28685391]
  56. Br J Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;150:782-6 [PMID: 3651732]
  57. J Affect Disord. 2017 Sep;219:86-92 [PMID: 28531848]
  58. Front Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 13;10:55 [PMID: 30814962]
  59. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2013 Jul-Aug;35(4):354-8 [PMID: 23541804]
  60. Matern Child Health J. 2018 Sep;22(9):1360-1367 [PMID: 29542057]
  61. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jul 10;18(1):223 [PMID: 32650793]
  62. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):240.e1-240.e9 [PMID: 32437665]
  63. J Affect Disord. 2019 Jun 15;253:292-302 [PMID: 31077972]
  64. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Mar;70(3):253-9 [PMID: 26560759]
  65. Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 28;11:1774 [PMID: 32849051]
  66. Front Psychiatry. 2018 Oct 11;9:467 [PMID: 30364304]
  67. J Pers Assess. 1990 Winter;55(3-4):610-7 [PMID: 2280326]
  68. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(5):599-605 [PMID: 19308810]
  69. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2014 Sep;21(7):573-9 [PMID: 24299168]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0anxietypersonalitysymptomsSESdepressivepregnantpositivewomenpregnancycopingemotionaldistressassociationeffectssupportsocioeconomicstatusassociationsHoweverchainresilienceResultswellnegativesociallowPreviousstudiessuggestedcertaincharacteristicsassociatedunderlyingmechanismrarelyunderstoodcurrentstudyinvestigatedlinkswomen'stestedmediatingtwofactors-socialexploredwhethermoderateincludingdirectand/orindirectrelativelylargesampleChina=1157showedpsychoticismneuroticismextraversiondepressioncontrollingfourimportantvariablesfirstadverseexperienceplannednumberweeksactedmediatorsOveralldemonstratedinvarianceacrossmoderatedrelationshipSpecificallyweakerhighoneshighlightimportancedecreasepersonality-relatedsymptomamongFurthermoreidentifyingfactorsalleviateurgentlycalledforPersonalityCharacteristicsEmotionalDistressAmongChinesePregnantWomen:ModeratedMediationModel

Similar Articles

Cited By