Methods for Monitoring Risk of Hypoxic Damage in Fetal and Neonatal Brains: A Review.

Liaisan Uzianbaeva, Yan Yan, Tanaya Joshi, Nina Yin, Chaur-Dong Hsu, Edgar Hernandez-Andrade, Mohammad Mehrmohammadi
Author Information
  1. Liaisan Uzianbaeva: Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
  2. Yan Yan: Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
  3. Tanaya Joshi: Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
  4. Nina Yin: Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
  5. Chaur-Dong Hsu: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
  6. Edgar Hernandez-Andrade: Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  7. Mohammad Mehrmohammadi: Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.

Abstract

Fetal, perinatal, and neonatal asphyxia are vital health issues for the most vulnerable groups in human beings, including fetuses, newborns, and infants. Severe reduction in oxygen and blood supply to the fetal brain can cause hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), leading to long-term neurological disorders, including mental impairment and cerebral palsy. Such neurological disorders are major healthcare concerns. Therefore, there has been a continuous effort to develop clinically useful diagnostic tools for accurately and quantitatively measuring and monitoring blood and oxygen supply to the fetal and neonatal brain to avoid severe consequences of asphyxia HIE and neonatal encephalopathy. Major diagnostic technologies used for this purpose include fetal heart rate monitoring, fetus scalp blood sampling, ultrasound imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, X-ray computed tomography, and nuclear medicine. In addition, given the limitations and shortcomings of traditional diagnostic methods, emerging technologies such as near-infrared spectroscopy and photoacoustic imaging have also been introduced as stand-alone or complementary solutions to address this critical gap in fetal and neonatal care. This review provides a thorough overview of the traditional and emerging technologies for monitoring fetal and neonatal brain oxygenation status and describes their clinical utility, performance, advantages, and disadvantages.

Keywords

References

  1. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 03;2:CD006066 [PMID: 28157275]
  2. Pediatr Res. 2017 Jan;81(1-2):150-155 [PMID: 27673422]
  3. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Oct;131(1):13-24 [PMID: 26433401]
  4. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Oct;40(4):949-57 [PMID: 24989457]
  5. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2014 Oct;24(4):389-400 [PMID: 25489132]
  6. J Physiol. 1986 Mar;372:557-73 [PMID: 3723419]
  7. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Feb;115(2 Pt 2):419-420 [PMID: 20093865]
  8. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1981 Mar;88(3):264-73 [PMID: 7470417]
  9. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2011 Jan;66(1):42-6 [PMID: 21510911]
  10. Pediatrics. 2014 Jun;133(6):e1508-17 [PMID: 24864165]
  11. Eur Radiol. 2018 May;28(5):1884-1890 [PMID: 29247352]
  12. Eur Radiol. 2012 Apr;22(4):772-8 [PMID: 22057247]
  13. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2016 May;36(5):842-61 [PMID: 26945019]
  14. Ann Neurol. 1985 Mar;17(3):287-96 [PMID: 3873209]
  15. Interface Focus. 2011 Aug 6;1(4):602-31 [PMID: 22866233]
  16. Phys Med Biol. 2005 Sep 21;50(18):4409-28 [PMID: 16148401]
  17. Radiographics. 2001 Jul-Aug;21(4):943-55 [PMID: 11452069]
  18. J Perinat Med. 2015 Mar;43(2):209-20 [PMID: 25324440]
  19. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Jan 1;133(1):29-33 [PMID: 760532]
  20. Pediatr Neurol. 2012 Feb;46(2):116-23 [PMID: 22264707]
  21. Pediatr Neurol. 2011 Oct;45(4):220-4 [PMID: 21907881]
  22. Neuroradiology. 2010 Jun;52(6):555-66 [PMID: 20390260]
  23. Paediatr Child Health. 2018 Aug;23(5):322-328 [PMID: 30657135]
  24. N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 23;355(21):2195-202 [PMID: 17124017]
  25. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009 Oct;14(5):299-310 [PMID: 19632909]
  26. Pan Afr Med J. 2016 Feb 12;23:39 [PMID: 27200144]
  27. Radiographics. 2006 Oct;26 Suppl 1:S159-72 [PMID: 17050513]
  28. Pediatr Radiol. 1998 Apr;28(4):212-22 [PMID: 9545473]
  29. J Pediatr. 2004 Aug;145(2 Suppl):S19-27 [PMID: 15292883]
  30. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;108(3 Pt 1):656-66 [PMID: 16946228]
  31. Fertil Steril. 1997 Jan;67(1):30-3 [PMID: 8986679]
  32. Science. 2012 Mar 23;335(6075):1458-62 [PMID: 22442475]
  33. Prenat Diagn. 2013 Feb;33(2):141-5 [PMID: 23233459]
  34. Prev Med. 1998 Mar-Apr;27(2):184-8 [PMID: 9578992]
  35. Int J Mol Imaging. 2011;2011:796025 [PMID: 21603240]
  36. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Feb;170(2):456-61 [PMID: 8116697]
  37. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2000 Dec;14(3):40-52 [PMID: 11930378]
  38. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Oct 15;138(4):399-403 [PMID: 7424995]
  39. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997 Nov-Dec;18(10):1816-20 [PMID: 9403433]
  40. Curr Mol Imaging. 2013 Mar;2(1):89-105 [PMID: 24032095]
  41. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2277-84 [PMID: 18046031]
  42. Trends Biotechnol. 2011 May;29(5):213-21 [PMID: 21324541]
  43. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1990 Mar;68(3):1086-91 [PMID: 2341336]
  44. Tomography. 2015 Sep;1(1):3-17 [PMID: 26844301]
  45. J Physiol. 1974 Dec;243(3):599-618 [PMID: 4475694]
  46. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012 Mar;32(3):403-12 [PMID: 22252237]
  47. Medicina (Kaunas). 2013;49(1):42-9 [PMID: 23652717]
  48. Biomed Opt Express. 2021 Feb 22;12(3):1512-1528 [PMID: 33796369]
  49. Eur Radiol. 2016 Dec;26(12):4570-4576 [PMID: 27189488]
  50. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Nov 03;15:285 [PMID: 26531186]
  51. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Mar;40(3):694-9 [PMID: 24738115]
  52. Radiographics. 1992 Jan;12(1):91-109; discussion 110 [PMID: 1734485]
  53. Adv Neonatal Care. 2011 Dec;11(6):382-8 [PMID: 22123468]
  54. Eur Radiol. 2019 Apr;29(4):2017-2026 [PMID: 30276673]
  55. Fertil Steril. 1995 Dec;64(6):1201-3 [PMID: 7589677]
  56. J Neurosci Methods. 2008 Mar 15;168(2):412-21 [PMID: 18155298]
  57. Pediatrics. 2010 Feb;125(2):e382-95 [PMID: 20083516]
  58. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2020;47(2):145-155 [PMID: 31434069]
  59. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 Jun;20(3):154-63 [PMID: 25725998]
  60. Ann Neurol. 2013 Feb;73(2):224-35 [PMID: 23224915]
  61. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Apr;194(4):868-73 [PMID: 20308484]
  62. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Nov;29(22):3682-5 [PMID: 26762827]
  63. Pediatrics. 2012 Mar;129(3):e690-7 [PMID: 22331345]
  64. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun 1;137(6):e177-e197 [PMID: 34011892]
  65. BJOG. 2008 Nov;115(12):1557-63 [PMID: 18752587]
  66. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Jan;30:62-7 [PMID: 26253238]
  67. Pediatr Res. 2001 Apr;49(4):495-501 [PMID: 11264432]
  68. Indian Pediatr. 2001 Jul;38(7):705-13 [PMID: 11463957]
  69. Am J Perinatol. 2014 Nov;31(10):855-62 [PMID: 24347263]
  70. Br J Radiol. 2017 Jan;90(1069):20160362 [PMID: 27768394]
  71. Nature. 1970 Jul 25;227(5256):388-90 [PMID: 5428441]
  72. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008 Sep-Oct;37(5):510-5 [PMID: 18761565]
  73. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jun;164(6 Pt 1):1563-9; discussion 1569-70 [PMID: 2048604]
  74. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Dec;103 Suppl 1:i3-13 [PMID: 20007987]
  75. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Aug;27(4):509-36 [PMID: 23702579]
  76. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2000 Dec;14(3):1-18 [PMID: 11930376]
  77. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Jun;8(3):195-7 [PMID: 16787589]
  78. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 Jul;91(7):830-7 [PMID: 22536843]
  79. Annu Rev Med. 1968;19:195-206 [PMID: 4871686]
  80. Lancet. 1990 Sep 29;336(8718):819-20 [PMID: 1976186]
  81. Pediatr Res. 2020 Mar;87(Suppl 1):25-36 [PMID: 32218537]
  82. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Apr;182(4):982-7 [PMID: 10764485]
  83. Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jan;85(1):149-55 [PMID: 7800313]
  84. Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jul 28;20(15): [PMID: 32731449]
  85. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 May;200(5):989-1000 [PMID: 23617480]
  86. Neonatology. 2008;94(4):237-44 [PMID: 18784420]
  87. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014 Nov;61(11):2796-805 [PMID: 24951678]
  88. J Pediatr Neurosci. 2017 Jan-Mar;12(1):1-6 [PMID: 28553370]
  89. Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 15;85 Pt 1:287-93 [PMID: 23631990]
  90. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 May;75(5):817-20 [PMID: 2325964]
  91. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1994 Sep;36(9):813-25 [PMID: 7926331]
  92. Nucl Med Commun. 2008 Mar;29(3):193-207 [PMID: 18349789]
  93. J Reprod Med. 1997 Dec;42(12):785-9 [PMID: 9437592]
  94. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Mar;160(3):694-7 [PMID: 2929695]
  95. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Apr;123(4):896-901 [PMID: 24785633]
  96. BJOG. 2014 Aug;121(9):1056-60; discussion 1060-2 [PMID: 24597746]
  97. J Nucl Med. 2015 Aug;56(8):1218-22 [PMID: 26089550]
  98. Nat Biotechnol. 2003 Jul;21(7):803-6 [PMID: 12808463]
  99. Acta Paediatr. 1995 Aug;84(8):927-32 [PMID: 7488819]
  100. Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 25;8(1):6511 [PMID: 29695729]
  101. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Nov;34(8):757 [PMID: 24911027]
  102. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Jan;95(1):5-8 [PMID: 26696237]
  103. Medicina (Kaunas). 2014;50(2):100-10 [PMID: 25172604]
  104. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Jan;29(1):9-17 [PMID: 17925363]
  105. Pediatr Radiol. 1998 Apr;28(4):201-11 [PMID: 9545472]
  106. Early Hum Dev. 2010 Jun;86(6):329-38 [PMID: 20554402]
  107. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jun;168(6 Pt 1):1820-5; discussion 1825-6 [PMID: 8317527]
  108. Semin Perinatol. 2015 Mar;39(2):159-67 [PMID: 25712162]
  109. Pediatrics. 1998 Dec;102(6):E62 [PMID: 9832590]
  110. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;199(6):587-95 [PMID: 19084096]
  111. Pediatrics. 2013 Jan;131(1):88-98 [PMID: 23248219]
  112. J Biomed Opt. 2012 Jun;17(6):066016 [PMID: 22734772]
  113. J Physiol. 2016 Mar 1;594(5):1215-30 [PMID: 26496004]
  114. Pediatrics. 2000 Aug;106(2 Pt 1):235-43 [PMID: 10920145]
  115. Pediatrics. 1983 Nov;72(5):589-601 [PMID: 6605514]
  116. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2016 Feb 5;25(1):1-10 [PMID: 27299282]
  117. Pediatr Res. 2013 Jul;74(1):82-7 [PMID: 23618911]
  118. Semin Perinatol. 2010 Feb;34(1):28-38 [PMID: 20109970]
  119. BJOG. 2016 Oct;123(11):1771 [PMID: 27653326]
  120. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998 Jun;78(2):133-40 [PMID: 9622310]
  121. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2015;17:385-414 [PMID: 26643024]
  122. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Mar;156(3):709-12 [PMID: 3548386]
  123. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Nov;173(5):1357-63 [PMID: 7503167]
  124. J Perinat Med. 2015 Jul;43(4):473-9 [PMID: 24914710]
  125. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Apr;13(2):133-6 [PMID: 11315866]
  126. J Biomed Opt. 2006 Mar-Apr;11(2):024015 [PMID: 16674205]
  127. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Sep;240:62-67 [PMID: 31229725]
  128. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Jan;182(1):243-52 [PMID: 14684546]

Grants

  1. R01 EB030058/NIBIB NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Asphyxia Neonatorum
Brain
Female
Fetus
Humans
Hypoxia
Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Pregnancy

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0imagingneonatalfetalasphyxiaencephalopathyFetalbloodbraindiagnosticmonitoringtechnologiesNeonatalincludingoxygensupplyHIEneurologicaldisordersresonanceX-raycomputedtomographytraditionalemergingperinatalvitalhealthissuesvulnerablegroupshumanbeingsfetusesnewbornsinfantsSeverereductioncancausehypoxic-ischemicleadinglong-termmentalimpairmentcerebralpalsymajorhealthcareconcernsThereforecontinuouseffortdevelopclinicallyusefultoolsaccuratelyquantitativelymeasuringavoidsevereconsequencesMajorusedpurposeincludeheartratefetusscalpsamplingultrasoundmagneticnuclearmedicineadditiongivenlimitationsshortcomingsmethodsnear-infraredspectroscopyphotoacousticalsointroducedstand-alonecomplementarysolutionsaddresscriticalgapcarereviewprovidesthoroughoverviewoxygenationstatusdescribesclinicalutilityperformanceadvantagesdisadvantagesMethodsMonitoringRiskHypoxicDamageBrains:ReviewBloodflowDiagnosticHypoxic-ischemicMagneticOxygenationPhotoacousticUltrasound

Similar Articles

Cited By