Under-reporting of COVID-19 in the Northern Health Authority region of British Columbia.

Matthew R P Parker, Yangming Li, Lloyd T Elliott, Junling Ma, Laura L E Cowen
Author Information
  1. Matthew R P Parker: Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science Simon Fraser University Burnaby BC Canada. ORCID
  2. Yangming Li: Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Victoria Victoria BC Canada.
  3. Lloyd T Elliott: Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science Simon Fraser University Burnaby BC Canada.
  4. Junling Ma: Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Victoria Victoria BC Canada.
  5. Laura L E Cowen: Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Victoria Victoria BC Canada.

Abstract

Asymptomatic and pauci-symptomatic presentations of COVID-19 along with restrictive testing protocols result in undetected COVID-19 cases. Estimating undetected cases is crucial to understanding the true severity of the outbreak. We introduce a new hierarchical disease dynamics model based on the -mixtures hidden population framework. The new models make use of three sets of disease count data per region: reported cases, recoveries and deaths. Treating the first two as under-counted through binomial thinning, we model the true population state at each time point by partitioning the diseased population into the active, recovered and died categories. Both domestic spread and imported cases are considered. These models are applied to estimate the level of under-reporting of COVID-19 in the Northern Health Authority region of British Columbia, Canada, during 30 weeks of the provincial recovery plan. Parameter covariates are easily implemented and used to improve model estimates. We compare two distinct methods of model-fitting for this case study: (1) maximum likelihood estimation, and (2) Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo. The two methods agreed exactly in their estimates of under-reporting rate. When accounting for changes in weekly testing volumes, we found under-reporting rates varying from 60.2% to 84.2%.

Keywords

References

  1. Stat Med. 2016 Nov 20;35(26):4875-4890 [PMID: 27396957]
  2. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2035057 [PMID: 33410879]
  3. PLoS Med. 2020 Sep 22;17(9):e1003346 [PMID: 32960881]
  4. Biometrics. 2004 Mar;60(1):108-15 [PMID: 15032780]
  5. Nature. 2021 Feb;590(7844):134-139 [PMID: 33348340]
  6. Ecol Evol. 2019 Feb 05;9(2):899-909 [PMID: 30766679]
  7. Infect Dis Model. 2021;6:930-941 [PMID: 34316526]
  8. PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0242956 [PMID: 33270713]
  9. Lancet. 2021 May 15;397(10287):1819-1829 [PMID: 33964222]
  10. Transfusion. 2021 Mar;61(3):862-872 [PMID: 33527398]
  11. Biometrics. 2011 Jun;67(2):577-87 [PMID: 20662829]
  12. Euro Surveill. 2020 Apr;25(17): [PMID: 32372755]
  13. J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Jul 27;35(29):e269 [PMID: 32715672]
  14. Int J Epidemiol. 2021 May 17;50(2):410-419 [PMID: 33615345]
  15. Eur J Public Health. 2021 Oct 11;31(4):917-920 [PMID: 34180981]
  16. Harm Reduct J. 2014 Mar 03;11:9 [PMID: 24589019]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0COVID-19casesdiseasemodelpopulationtwounder-reportingtestingundetectedtruenewmodelsNorthernHealthAuthorityregionBritishColumbiaestimatesmethods2%Asymptomaticpauci-symptomaticpresentationsalongrestrictiveprotocolsresultEstimatingcrucialunderstandingseverityoutbreakintroducehierarchicaldynamicsbased-mixtureshiddenframeworkmakeusethreesetscountdataperregion:reportedrecoveriesdeathsTreatingfirstunder-countedbinomialthinningstatetimepointpartitioningdiseasedactiverecovereddiedcategoriesdomesticspreadimportedconsideredappliedestimatelevelCanada30weeksprovincialrecoveryplanParametercovariateseasilyimplementedusedimprovecomparedistinctmodel-fittingcasestudy:1maximumlikelihoodestimation2BayesianMarkovchainMonteCarloagreedexactlyrateaccountingchangesweeklyvolumesfoundratesvarying6084Under-reportingCOVID‐19MCMCN‐mixturesanalyticsunder‐reporting

Similar Articles

Cited By