Evaluating Glycemic Control During Basalin or Lantus Administration in Adults With Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Huiying Wang, Yunting Zhou, Xiaofang Zhai, Bo Ding, Ting Jing, Xiaofei Su, Huiqin Li, Jianhua Ma
Author Information
  1. Huiying Wang: Department of Endocrinology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  2. Yunting Zhou: Department of Endocrinology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  3. Xiaofang Zhai: Department of Endocrinology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  4. Bo Ding: Department of Endocrinology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  5. Ting Jing: Department of Endocrinology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  6. Xiaofei Su: Department of Endocrinology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  7. Huiqin Li: Department of Endocrinology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
  8. Jianhua Ma: Department of Endocrinology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Abstract

Aim: This study aims at evaluating glycemic control during Basalin or Lantus administration in adults with controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus using continuous glucose monitoring system (CGM).
Methods: 47 patients with well-controlled T2DM using both Basalin and oral hypoglycemic drugs were recruited. CGM were applied from day 1 to day 3 with the unchanged dose of Basalin and then removed from day 4. A washout was performed with Lantus at the same dose as Basalin from day 4 to day 10. Then patients were continued to install the CGM under Lantus administration from day 11 to day 13. Variables of CGM, such as the area under the curve (AUC) for both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, 24h mean blood glucose (24h MBG), 24h standard deviation of blood glucose (24h SDBG), 24h mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (24h MAGE), PT (percentage of time), and time in range (TIR), were calculated and compared between Basalin group and Lantus group.
Results: The group of Lantus showed lower 24h MBG (p<0.01), 24h MAGE (p<0.05), and lower 24h SDBG (p<0.01) than the Basalin group. Lantus-treated patients had a lower PT and AUC when the cut-off point for blood glucose was 10 mmol/L (p<0.05) and 13.9 mmol/L (p<0.05), respectively. In this study, no patient developed symptomatic hypoglycemia, few hypoglycemia was observed and there was no difference of hypoglycemia between the two groups.
Conclusion: In patients with well-controlled T2DM who were treated with insulin glargine, Lantus group showed lower MBG, GV, and lower PT (BG > 10.0 mmol/L, BG > 13.9 mmol/L) than Basalin group. In summary, for T2DM population with HbA1c ≤ 7%, Lantus may be a better choice compared with Basalin.

Keywords

References

  1. MMW Fortschr Med. 2004 Jan 22;146(3-4):35-8 [PMID: 15035446]
  2. Diabetes Care. 2019 Mar;42(3):400-405 [PMID: 30352896]
  3. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Aug;20(8):531-540 [PMID: 29979618]
  4. Med Hypotheses. 2020 Mar;136:109504 [PMID: 31794876]
  5. Diabetes Care. 2011 Jul;34(7):1605-9 [PMID: 21610126]
  6. Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S13-S27 [PMID: 29222373]
  7. JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2397-2406 [PMID: 32543682]
  8. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2019 Jul;29(7):736-743 [PMID: 31153746]
  9. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013 Sep;15 Suppl 2:3-8 [PMID: 24034513]
  10. Diabetologia. 2020 Feb;63(2):242-252 [PMID: 31701199]
  11. Circulation. 2002 Oct 15;106(16):2067-72 [PMID: 12379575]
  12. J Diabetes Complications. 2016 Sep-Oct;30(7):1308-14 [PMID: 27311787]
  13. Diabetes Care. 2018 Dec;41(12):2669-2701 [PMID: 30291106]
  14. J Diabetes Investig. 2019 Mar;10(2):352-357 [PMID: 29989335]
  15. Diabetes Care. 2013 Apr;36(4):1026-32 [PMID: 23349547]
  16. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2017 Nov 14;16:45 [PMID: 29164077]
  17. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020 Oct 29;13:4059-4065 [PMID: 33149645]
  18. Diabetes Metab. 2019 Oct;45(5):446-452 [PMID: 30763700]
  19. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2019 Feb;35(2):e3092 [PMID: 30345631]
  20. F1000Res. 2018 Apr 18;7:477 [PMID: 29862021]
  21. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018 Aug 18;17(1):116 [PMID: 30121076]
  22. PLoS One. 2020 Jan 17;15(1):e0225794 [PMID: 31951616]
  23. Front Immunol. 2018 Apr 27;9:906 [PMID: 29755474]
  24. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2019 Sep;35(6):e3158 [PMID: 30908791]
  25. JAMA. 2019 Jul 23;322(4):326-335 [PMID: 31334795]
  26. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Mar;21(3):726-731 [PMID: 30421545]
  27. J Diabetes Investig. 2017 Jan;8(1):115-120 [PMID: 27253191]
  28. Diabetes Care. 2012 Jun;35(6):1364-79 [PMID: 22517736]
  29. Diabetologia. 2019 Jan;62(1):3-16 [PMID: 30171279]
  30. J Endocrinol Invest. 2018 Feb;41(2):179-184 [PMID: 28643298]
  31. Diabetes Care. 2019 Aug;42(8):1593-1603 [PMID: 31177185]
  32. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jul 25;369(4):362-72 [PMID: 23883381]
  33. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Feb;22(2):72-78 [PMID: 31524497]

MeSH Term

Aged
Aniline Compounds
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Female
Glycemic Control
Humans
Hypoglycemic Agents
Insulin Glargine
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies

Chemicals

Aniline Compounds
Hypoglycemic Agents
Insulin Glargine
fluchloralin

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0BasalinLantus24hdaygroupglucoselowerp<0CGMpatientshypoglycemiammol/LglycemicT2DM1013bloodMBGPT05studyadministration2usingcontinuousmonitoringsystemwell-controlleddose4AUCmeanSDBGMAGEtimecomparedshowed019insulinglargineBG>Aim:aimsevaluatingcontroladultscontrolledtypediabetesmellitusMethods:47oralhypoglycemicdrugsrecruitedapplied13unchangedremovedwashoutperformedcontinuedinstall11VariablesareacurvehyperglycemiastandarddeviationamplitudeexcursionpercentagerangeTIRcalculatedResults:Lantus-treatedcut-offpointrespectivelypatientdevelopedsymptomaticobserveddifferencetwogroupsConclusion:treatedGV0summarypopulationHbA1c7%maybetterchoiceEvaluatingGlycemicControlAdministrationAdultsControlledTypeDiabetesMellitusUsingContinuousGlucoseMonitoringvariability

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.