Effect of HIPEC on Peritoneal Recurrence in Peritoneal Metastasis Treated With Cytoreductive Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Daniel Ren Yi Yap, Jolene Si Min Wong, Qiu Xuan Tan, Joey Wee-Shan Tan, Claramae Shulyn Chia, Chin-Ann Johnny Ong
Author Information
  1. Daniel Ren Yi Yap: Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumors (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
  2. Jolene Si Min Wong: Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumors (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
  3. Qiu Xuan Tan: Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumors (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
  4. Joey Wee-Shan Tan: Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumors (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
  5. Claramae Shulyn Chia: Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumors (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
  6. Chin-Ann Johnny Ong: Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumors (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is a late-stage manifestation of intra-abdominal malignancies. The current standard of care indicates that cure can only be achieved with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) which is often indicated with concurrent adjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). However, the utility of HIPEC within subsets of PM is not fully understood. We seek to compare the effectiveness of HIPEC in improving peritoneal recurrence rates in PM of different origins.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of trials on the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases, last searched in August 2021. Biases were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials as well as the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) framework.
RESULTS: 7 gastric PM studies, 3 ovarian PM studies, and 3 colorectal PM studies were included. Recurrence-free survival was improved in the HIPEC + CRS cohort in 5 gastric trials but only 1 ovarian trial and none of colorectal origin.
DISCUSSION: Our findings indicate decent effectiveness of HIPEC in gastric PM, but limited utility in ovarian and colorectal PM. Limitations in the current literature are attributed to the paucity of data available, a lack of homogeneity and consideration of novel and personalised treatment regimens. We implore for further studies to be conducted with a focus on patient selection and stratification, and suggest a reframing of approach towards modern molecular and targeted therapeutic options in future studies of HIPEC.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.researchregistry.com/browse-the-registry#registryofsystematicreviewsmeta-analyses/registryofsystematicreviewsmeta-analysesdetails/60c1ffff0c1b78001e8efbe3/, identifier reviewregistry1166.

Keywords

References

  1. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Feb;22(2):256-266 [PMID: 33476595]
  2. J Minim Access Surg. 2016 Jan-Mar;12(1):86-9 [PMID: 26917929]
  3. J Surg Oncol. 2008 Sep 15;98(4):242-6 [PMID: 18726885]
  4. Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 27;8(26):43481-43490 [PMID: 28415645]
  5. Front Oncol. 2021 Dec 03;11:795390 [PMID: 34926311]
  6. Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 19;8(45):79556-79566 [PMID: 29108335]
  7. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Mar-Apr;22(3):428-32 [PMID: 25461683]
  8. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2010 Feb 15;2(2):68-75 [PMID: 21160924]
  9. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Feb;7(1):45-57 [PMID: 26941983]
  10. Cancer. 1999 Feb 1;85(3):529-34 [PMID: 10091726]
  11. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jun;18(6):1575-81 [PMID: 21431408]
  12. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 10;37(23):2028-2040 [PMID: 31084544]
  13. Cancer. 1988 Jan 15;61(2):232-7 [PMID: 3121165]
  14. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 May;22(5):1570-5 [PMID: 25391263]
  15. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2017 Feb;27(2):246-247 [PMID: 28114231]
  16. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016 Feb;7(1):18-28 [PMID: 26941981]
  17. Int J Hyperthermia. 2013;29(2):156-67 [PMID: 23418917]
  18. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Sep;21(9):1147-1154 [PMID: 32717180]
  19. Cancer. 2020 Dec 15;126(24):5256-5262 [PMID: 32931024]
  20. Cancer. 1994 Apr 15;73(8):2048-52 [PMID: 8156509]
  21. Gastric Cancer. 2020 Jan;23(1):11-22 [PMID: 31228044]
  22. Gastroenterology. 2010 Dec;139(6):1995-2004.e15 [PMID: 20621683]
  23. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 May;23(5):1660-5 [PMID: 26714958]
  24. Gland Surg. 2020 Aug;9(4):1140-1148 [PMID: 32953629]
  25. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 18;378(3):230-240 [PMID: 29342393]
  26. ANZ J Surg. 2003 Sep;73(9):712-6 [PMID: 12956787]
  27. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Feb 17;12(1):37 [PMID: 28212684]
  28. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;23(6):1971-9 [PMID: 26753751]
  29. Cancers (Basel). 2019 Jan 11;11(1): [PMID: 30641919]
  30. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov 7;19(41):6979-94 [PMID: 24222942]
  31. J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jul;30(4):e59 [PMID: 31074245]
  32. BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):924-6 [PMID: 18436948]
  33. World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Feb 21;15(1):51 [PMID: 28222738]
  34. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Oct;14(10):2702-13 [PMID: 17653801]
  35. Curr Oncol Rep. 2018 Jun 8;20(8):62 [PMID: 29884974]
  36. World J Surg. 1994 Jan-Feb;18(1):150-5 [PMID: 8197772]
  37. J Surg Oncol. 2008 Sep 15;98(4):237-41 [PMID: 18726884]
  38. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;23(13):4214-4221 [PMID: 27027308]
  39. Cancer Manag Res. 2017 Jun 30;9:259-266 [PMID: 28721098]
  40. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 10;27(5):681-5 [PMID: 19103728]
  41. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;7(2):152-9 [PMID: 27065705]
  42. J Gynecol Oncol. 2018 May;29(3):e53 [PMID: 29533028]
  43. Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 19;11(1):16829 [PMID: 34413360]
  44. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Feb;22(2):162-164 [PMID: 33476594]
  45. Cancer Treat Res. 1996;82:359-74 [PMID: 8849962]
  46. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Oct;4(10):761-770 [PMID: 31371228]
  47. J Clin Med. 2019 Oct 15;8(10): [PMID: 31618869]
  48. J Clin Med. 2018 Dec 19;7(12): [PMID: 30572653]
  49. BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928 [PMID: 22008217]
  50. BMC Cancer. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):105 [PMID: 32041558]
  51. Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 22;9(1):10572 [PMID: 31332257]
  52. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2018 Sep 1;19(10):49 [PMID: 30173342]
  53. Cancer. 1990 Jan 1;65(1):65-71 [PMID: 2104572]
  54. Updates Surg. 2019 Jun;71(2):389-394 [PMID: 30406932]
  55. Oncology. 1999;57(2):106-14 [PMID: 10461056]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PMHIPECstudiesgastricovariancolorectalPeritonealtrialsmetastasiscurrentcytoreductivesurgeryCRShyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapyutilityeffectivenessperitonealrecurrenceconductedCochrane3BACKGROUND:late-stagemanifestationintra-abdominalmalignanciesstandardcareindicatescurecanachievedoftenindicatedconcurrentadjuvantHoweverwithinsubsetsfullyunderstoodseekcompareimprovingratesdifferentoriginsMETHODS:systematicreviewPubMedEMBASEdatabaseslastsearchedAugust2021BiasesassessedusingCollaboration'stoolassessingriskbiasrandomizedwellMethodologicalIndexNon-RandomizedStudiesMINORSframeworkRESULTS:7includedRecurrence-freesurvivalimproved+cohort51trialnoneoriginDISCUSSION:findingsindicatedecentlimitedLimitationsliteratureattributedpaucitydataavailablelackhomogeneityconsiderationnovelpersonalisedtreatmentregimensimplorefocuspatientselectionstratificationsuggestreframingapproachtowardsmodernmoleculartargetedtherapeuticoptionsfutureSYSTEMATICREVIEWREGISTRATION:https://wwwresearchregistrycom/browse-the-registry#registryofsystematicreviewsmeta-analyses/registryofsystematicreviewsmeta-analysesdetails/60c1ffff0c1b78001e8efbe3/identifierreviewregistry1166EffectRecurrenceMetastasisTreatedCytoreductiveSurgery:SystematicReview

Similar Articles

Cited By