Emotions towards potential genetic offspring among oocyte donors: a cross-sectional study.

Sahar Khosravi, Ashraf Kazemi, Seyyed Mehdi Ahmadi
Author Information
  1. Sahar Khosravi: Reproductive Health Department, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  2. Ashraf Kazemi: Reproductive Health Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Hezarjerib AV, Isfahan, Iran. Kazemi@nm.mui.ac.ir. ORCID
  3. Seyyed Mehdi Ahmadi: Isfahan Fertility and Infertility Center, Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The presence of maternal emotions towards the offspring resulting from assisted reproductive techniques (ART) has been previously reported in oocyte donors. However, there is limited information about the presence of these emotions in oocyte donors during the ART process and before pregnancy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the emotions of oocyte donor women towards the potential genetic offspring and to compare them with women treated with ART by using own oocytes.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 100 women who were divided into two groups of oocyte donors and those treated with ART and using autologous oocyte. At the time of oocyte retrieval. Using a validated questionnaire, the emotions toward potential offspring (EPO) resulting from ART and its three dimensions (including imagination, sense of ownership, and importance of treatment outcome) were measured and compared in two groups.
RESULTS: Comparison of the EPO in the two groups showed that the emotions in all three dimensions were lower in oocyte donors than the other group (p < 0.001). Moreover, in oocyte donors, the mean score of the scale of the importance of treatment outcome dimension was higher than the other two scales (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The results of the study showed that there is a significant emotion toward the potential offspring in oocyte donors. The presence of these emotions thus should be considered in formulating the ethical charter of ART by using oocyte donation.

Keywords

References

  1. Anthropol Med. 2018 Dec;25(3):265-279 [PMID: 30686029]
  2. Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(2):455-66 [PMID: 19022427]
  3. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Sep;252:313-316 [PMID: 32652481]
  4. Hum Reprod. 2014 May;29(5):1076-89 [PMID: 24626802]
  5. J Affect Disord. 2020 Nov 1;276:287-296 [PMID: 32697711]
  6. Fertil Steril. 2014 Oct;102(4):1160-6 [PMID: 25123638]
  7. Health Commun. 2017 May;32(5):550-559 [PMID: 27328283]
  8. Birth. 1990 Jun;17(2):92-6 [PMID: 2363773]
  9. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2021 Jul;24(3):169-181 [PMID: 30982353]
  10. Fertil Steril. 2000 Oct;74(4):660-7 [PMID: 11020503]
  11. Hum Reprod. 2019 Apr 1;34(4):672-678 [PMID: 30805634]
  12. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2018 Oct 9;20(4):236-242 [PMID: 30299264]
  13. J Health Psychol. 2020 Oct 6;:1359105320963211 [PMID: 33023322]
  14. Hum Reprod Update. 2009 Sep-Oct;15(5):499-515 [PMID: 19443709]
  15. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Aug;98(8):1055-1062 [PMID: 30779111]

MeSH Term

Cross-Sectional Studies
Emotions
Female
Humans
Oocyte Donation
Oocytes
Pregnancy
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0oocyteemotionsARTdonorsoffspringstudypotentialtwopresencetowardswomenusinggroupsresultingreproductivetechniquesgenetictreatedcross-sectionaltowardEPOthreedimensionsimportancetreatmentoutcomeshowedp < 0001donationBACKGROUND:maternalassistedpreviouslyreportedHoweverlimitedinformationprocesspregnancyaimevaluatedonorcompareoocytesMETHODS:conducted100dividedautologoustimeretrievalUsingvalidatedquestionnaireincludingimaginationsenseownershipmeasuredcomparedRESULTS:ComparisonlowergroupMoreovermeanscorescaledimensionhigherscalesCONCLUSION:resultssignificantemotionthusconsideredformulatingethicalcharterEmotionsamongdonors:AssistedEmotionOffspringOocyte

Similar Articles

Cited By