A Pragmatic Intervention Using Financial Incentives for Pregnancy Weight Management: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.

Rebecca Krukowski, Brandi Johnson, Hyeonju Kim, Saunak Sen, Riad Homsi
Author Information
  1. Rebecca Krukowski: Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States. ORCID
  2. Brandi Johnson: Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States. ORCID
  3. Hyeonju Kim: Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States. ORCID
  4. Saunak Sen: Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States. ORCID
  5. Riad Homsi: Just For Women Obstetric Clinic, Memphis, TN, United States. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) is common and can result in maternal and child health complications. Pragmatic behavioral interventions that can be incorporated into standard obstetric care are needed, and financial incentives are a promising approach.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of recruitment, randomization, and retention, as well as treatment engagement and intervention satisfaction, in a behavioral program. The program provided small incentives for meeting behavioral goals of self-weighing and physical activity as well as larger outcome incentives for meeting GWG goals.
METHODS: We recruited 40 adult women in their first trimester of pregnancy from February 2019 to September 2019 at an obstetric clinic. Participants were randomized to 3 intervention components using a 2×2×2 factorial design: daily incentives for self-weighing (lottery vs certain loss), incentives for adhering to the Institute of Medicine's GWG guidelines based on BMI category (monthly vs overall), and incentives for reaching physical activity goals (yes vs no). Participants were asked to complete daily weigh-ins using the Withings Body wireless scale provided by the study, as well as wear a physical activity tracker (Fitbit Flex 2). Feasibility outcomes of recruitment, randomization, and retention, as well as treatment engagement and intervention satisfaction, were assessed. Weight assessments were conducted at baseline, 32-week gestation, and 36-week gestation.
RESULTS: Participants were enrolled at, on average, 9.6 (SD 1.8) weeks' gestation. Of the 39 participants who were oriented to their condition and received the intervention, 24 (62%) were Black or African American, 30 (77%) were not married, and 29 (74%) had an annual household income of less than US $50,000. Of the 39 participants, 35 (90%) completed the follow-up data collection visit. Participants were generally quite positive about the intervention components, with a particular emphasis on the helpfulness of, and the enjoyment of using, the e-scale in both the quantitative and qualitative feedback. Participants who received the loss incentive, on average, had 2.86 times as many days of self-weighing as those who received the lottery incentive. Participants had a relatively low level of activity, with no difference between those who received a physical activity incentive and those who did not.
CONCLUSIONS: A financial incentive-based pragmatic intervention was feasible and acceptable for pregnant women for promoting self-weighing, physical activity, and healthy GWG. Participants were successfully recruited early in their first trimester of pregnancy and retained for follow-up data collection in the third trimester. Participants demonstrated promising engagement in self-weighing, particularly with loss-based incentives, and reported finding the self-weighing especially helpful. This study supports further investigation of pragmatic, clinic-based financial incentive-based interventions for healthy GWG behaviors.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03834194; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03834194.

Keywords

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT03834194

References

  1. Prev Med Rep. 2018 Feb 02;9:131-137 [PMID: 29616185]
  2. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017 Feb;25(2):302-310 [PMID: 28063226]
  3. Matern Child Health J. 2017 Mar;21(3):485-491 [PMID: 27449652]
  4. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Nov 19;3(4):e96 [PMID: 26586418]
  5. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015 Jan;23(1):70-6 [PMID: 25384463]
  6. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Apr;196(4):322.e1-8 [PMID: 17403405]
  7. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 Feb 1;107(2):183-194 [PMID: 29529157]
  8. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2019 Mar;1(1):42-49 [PMID: 33319756]
  9. Obes Rev. 2011 Jul;12(7):e602-20 [PMID: 21521451]
  10. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;108(3 Pt 1):635-43 [PMID: 16946225]
  11. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008 Nov 04;5:54 [PMID: 18983667]
  12. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Oct;78(4):684-9 [PMID: 14522725]
  13. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Nov 06;64(43):1215-20 [PMID: 26540367]
  14. Ann Behav Med. 2005 Dec;30(3):210-6 [PMID: 16336072]
  15. Ann Behav Med. 2014 Aug;48(1):92-9 [PMID: 24307474]
  16. Soc Sci Med. 2017 Jul;185:63-70 [PMID: 28554160]
  17. PLoS One. 2016 Jun 17;11(6):e0157403 [PMID: 27314953]
  18. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015 Feb;23(2):256-65 [PMID: 25521523]
  19. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2019 Mar;97(3):147-154 [PMID: 30661367]
  20. N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 4;365(5):388-90 [PMID: 21812669]
  21. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e39503 [PMID: 22792178]
  22. Womens Health (Lond). 2011 Nov;7(6):641-61 [PMID: 22040207]
  23. Prev Med. 2012 Nov;55 Suppl:S61-7 [PMID: 22244800]
  24. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Jul;32(7):1244-50 [PMID: 23836740]
  25. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;209(4):327.e1-17 [PMID: 23711667]
  26. Int J Obes (Lond). 2019 Oct;43(10):1914-1922 [PMID: 30705389]
  27. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 May;99(5 Pt 1):799-806 [PMID: 11978290]
  28. Obes Rev. 2013 Jun;14(6):435-50 [PMID: 23534901]
  29. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Apr 2;158(7):505-14 [PMID: 23546562]
  30. J Psychiatr Res. 2011 May;45(5):626-9 [PMID: 21035130]
  31. Prev Med. 2012 Nov;55 Suppl:S33-40 [PMID: 22227223]
  32. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;126(6):e135-e142 [PMID: 26595585]
  33. JAMA. 2008 Dec 10;300(22):2631-7 [PMID: 19066383]
  34. Prev Med. 2013 Mar;56(3-4):197-201 [PMID: 23295170]
  35. Obes Rev. 2008 Jul;9(4):355-67 [PMID: 17956546]
  36. LDI Issue Brief. 2012 Jul-Aug;17(9):1-4 [PMID: 22934330]
  37. Womens Health Issues. 2018 Nov - Dec;28(6):514-523 [PMID: 30061033]
  38. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994 Jul;51(7):568-76 [PMID: 8031230]
  39. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 May;29(5):770-7 [PMID: 24522623]
  40. Cancer. 2014 Apr 1;120 Suppl 7:1091-6 [PMID: 24643646]
  41. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Mar 15;164(6):385-94 [PMID: 26881417]
  42. Am J Prev Med. 2007 Apr;32(4):312-9 [PMID: 17383562]
  43. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Aug;69(4):717-21 [PMID: 11550739]
  44. Diabetologia. 2015 Oct;58(10):2229-37 [PMID: 26141788]
  45. Am J Prev Med. 2020 Aug;59(2):237-246 [PMID: 32446752]
  46. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Feb;202(2):135.e1-8 [PMID: 19683692]
  47. J Occup Environ Med. 2007 Sep;49(9):981-9 [PMID: 17848854]
  48. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Aug;54(4):382-5 [PMID: 24738837]
  49. BMC Public Health. 2018 Feb 13;18(1):244 [PMID: 29439689]
  50. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Nov;45(5):658-67 [PMID: 24139781]
  51. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):206-14 [PMID: 19124872]
  52. Rural Remote Health. 2014;14:2682 [PMID: 24785265]
  53. PLoS Med. 2016 Jan 19;13(1):e1001941 [PMID: 26785406]
  54. Prev Med. 2013 Jun;56(6):351-64 [PMID: 23480971]
  55. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 May;91(5):1336-41 [PMID: 20237138]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0Participantsincentivesself-weighingactivityinterventionphysicalGWGwellreceivedbehavioralfinancialstudyengagementgoalstrimesterpregnancyusingvsgestationincentiveweightcanPragmaticinterventionsobstetricpromisingrecruitmentrandomizationretentiontreatmentsatisfactionprogramprovidedmeetingrecruitedwomenfirst2019componentsdailylotteryloss2FeasibilityWeightaverage39participantsfollow-updatacollectionincentive-basedpragmatichealthyBACKGROUND:ExcessivegestationalgaincommonresultmaternalchildhealthcomplicationsincorporatedstandardcareneededapproachOBJECTIVE:aimevaluatefeasibilitysmalllargeroutcomeMETHODS:40adultFebruarySeptemberclinicrandomized32×2×2factorialdesign:certainadheringInstituteMedicine'sguidelinesbasedBMIcategorymonthlyoverallreachingyesaskedcompleteweigh-insWithingsBodywirelessscaleweartrackerFitbitFlexoutcomesassessedassessmentsconductedbaseline32-week36-weekRESULTS:enrolled96SD18weeks'orientedcondition2462%BlackAfricanAmerican3077%married2974%annualhouseholdincomelessUS$500003590%completedvisitgenerallyquitepositiveparticularemphasishelpfulnessenjoymente-scalequantitativequalitativefeedback86timesmanydaysrelativelylowleveldifferencenotCONCLUSIONS:feasibleacceptablepregnantpromotingsuccessfullyearlyretainedthirddemonstratedparticularlyloss-basedreportedfindingespeciallyhelpfulsupportsinvestigationclinic-basedbehaviorsTRIALREGISTRATION:ClinicalTrialsgovNCT03834194https://clinicaltrialsgov/ct2/show/NCT03834194InterventionUsingFinancialIncentivesPregnancyManagement:RandomizedControlledTrial

Similar Articles

Cited By