Factors associated with resident-to-resident elder mistreatment in nursing homes.

Karl Pillemer, Stephanie Silver, Mildred Ramirez, Jian Kong, Joseph P Eimicke, Gabriel D Boratgis, Rhoda Meador, Leslie Schultz, Mark S Lachs, Julia Nolte, Emily K Chen, Jeanne A Teresi
Author Information
  1. Karl Pillemer: Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
  2. Stephanie Silver: Research Division, Hebrew Home at Riverdale, RiverSpring Health, Bronx, New York, USA.
  3. Mildred Ramirez: Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
  4. Jian Kong: Research Division, Hebrew Home at Riverdale, RiverSpring Health, Bronx, New York, USA.
  5. Joseph P Eimicke: Research Division, Hebrew Home at Riverdale, RiverSpring Health, Bronx, New York, USA.
  6. Gabriel D Boratgis: Research Division, Hebrew Home at Riverdale, RiverSpring Health, Bronx, New York, USA.
  7. Rhoda Meador: Bronfenbrenner Center for Translational Research, College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
  8. Leslie Schultz: Bronfenbrenner Center for Translational Research, College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
  9. Mark S Lachs: Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
  10. Julia Nolte: Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
  11. Emily K Chen: Rand Corporation, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
  12. Jeanne A Teresi: Research Division, Hebrew Home at Riverdale, RiverSpring Health, Bronx, New York, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Resident-to-resident elder mistreatment (RREM) in nursing homes has serious physical and psychological consequences, but factors related to RREM occurrence remain unclear. This study identifies individual and environmental characteristics associated with involvement in RREM episodes.
METHODS: The design was an observational study carried out in five urban and five suburban New York state nursing homes randomly selected on the basis of size and location. The sample consisted of 2011 residents in 10 facilities; 83% of facilities and 84% of eligible residents participated. RREM and potential correlates were identified through resident interviews, staff interviews, shift coupons, observation, chart review, and accident or incident reports.
RESULTS: A multivariate analysis controlling for relevant covariates found that individuals involved in RREM incidents exhibit milder dementia, show behavioral symptoms, and are less functionally impaired. Although special care units (SCU) for dementia have benefits for residents, one potential hazard for SCU residents is elevated risk for RREM.
CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to prevent and intervene in RREM incidents are greatly needed. The correlates identified in this research point to the need for targeted interventions, specifically for residents with milder impairment and with behavioral symptoms and individuals in SCUs.

Keywords

References

  1. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 May;28(5):660-7 [PMID: 23225256]
  2. J Health Psychol. 2003 Jul;8(4):413-32 [PMID: 19127709]
  3. J Interpers Violence. 2019 Oct;34(19):3995-4019 [PMID: 27754922]
  4. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Aug 16;165(4):229-36 [PMID: 27295575]
  5. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1977-1978;8(1):9-42 [PMID: 873639]
  6. Psychosom Med. 2002 May-Jun;64(3):531-47 [PMID: 12021427]
  7. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Jul;46(7):862-9 [PMID: 9670873]
  8. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Mar 19;21(1):244 [PMID: 33740965]
  9. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1994;8 Suppl 1:S97-105 [PMID: 8068298]
  10. Gerontologist. 1989 Jun;29(3):314-20 [PMID: 2788108]
  11. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2018 Aug-Oct;30(4):284-308 [PMID: 29851550]
  12. Soc Sci Med. 2002 Jan;54(1):79-91 [PMID: 11820683]
  13. Age Ageing. 2015 May;44(3):356-64 [PMID: 25630802]
  14. West J Nurs Res. 2021 May 28;:1939459211018822 [PMID: 34044668]
  15. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1976;7(4):343-52 [PMID: 1024104]
  16. JAMA. 2004 Feb 4;291(5):591-8 [PMID: 14762038]
  17. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Aug;22(8):1678-1691.e6 [PMID: 33727003]
  18. Appl Res Qual Life. 2017 Jun;12(2):251-288 [PMID: 30220935]
  19. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 May;50(5):644-56 [PMID: 23159018]
  20. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994 Feb;42(2):192-7 [PMID: 8126335]
  21. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2018 Nov-Dec;30(5):385-401 [PMID: 30222059]
  22. West J Nurs Res. 2004 Oct;26(6):612-31 [PMID: 15359074]
  23. Gerontologist. 1993 Oct;33(5):667-74 [PMID: 8225012]
  24. Can J Aging. 2015 Jun;34(2):215-36 [PMID: 25752919]
  25. Australas J Ageing. 2020 Sep;39(3):269-276 [PMID: 31814276]
  26. Clin Nurs Res. 2013 Nov;22(4):461-74 [PMID: 23447361]
  27. Gerontologist. 2012 Feb;52(1):24-33 [PMID: 22048811]
  28. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Mar;60(3):256-9 [PMID: 17292019]
  29. Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S95-S106 [PMID: 17060840]
  30. Cult Health Sex. 2014 Jan 24;: [PMID: 24455983]
  31. Aggress Violent Behav. 2008 Mar 1;13(2):77-87 [PMID: 19750126]
  32. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2016;28(1):1-13 [PMID: 25894206]
  33. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2019 Jan-Feb;31(1):66-76 [PMID: 30358523]
  34. J Health Soc Behav. 2005 Mar;46(1):85-101 [PMID: 15869122]
  35. Scand J Public Health. 2018 Feb;46(20_suppl):20-26 [PMID: 29552963]
  36. Aging Ment Health. 2011 Jan;15(1):59-67 [PMID: 20924815]
  37. BMC Geriatr. 2005 Nov 10;5:13 [PMID: 16280091]
  38. J Appl Gerontol. 2018 Aug;37(8):947-964 [PMID: 27469497]
  39. J Gerontol. 1984 Mar;39(2):138-46 [PMID: 6699367]
  40. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Dec;65(12):2603-2609 [PMID: 29131309]
  41. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2001 Feb;16(2):139-46 [PMID: 11241718]

Grants

  1. C-022657/New York State Department of Health
  2. /Columbia University
  3. R03 AG049266/NIA NIH HHS
  4. P30 AG059303/NIA NIH HHS
  5. P30 AG022845/NIA NIH HHS
  6. R01 AG057389/NIA NIH HHS
  7. FYO42USC3721/National Institute of Justice
  8. R01 AG014299/NIA NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Aged
Dementia
Elder Abuse
Humans
New York
Nursing Homes

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0RREMresidentsnursingeldermistreatmenthomesdementiabehavioralsymptomsstudyassociatedfivefacilitiespotentialcorrelatesidentifiedinterviewsindividualsincidentsmilderSCUBACKGROUND:Resident-to-residentseriousphysicalpsychologicalconsequencesfactorsrelatedoccurrenceremainunclearidentifiesindividualenvironmentalcharacteristicsinvolvementepisodesMETHODS:designobservationalcarriedurbansuburbanNewYorkstaterandomlyselectedbasissizelocationsampleconsisted20111083%84%eligibleparticipatedresidentstaffshiftcouponsobservationchartreviewaccidentincidentreportsRESULTS:multivariateanalysiscontrollingrelevantcovariatesfoundinvolvedexhibitshowlessfunctionallyimpairedAlthoughspecialcareunitsbenefitsonehazardelevatedriskCONCLUSIONS:InterventionspreventintervenegreatlyneededresearchpointneedtargetedinterventionsspecificallyimpairmentSCUsFactorsresident-to-residenthome

Similar Articles

Cited By