Development and Validation of the Brief Nursing Stress Scale (BNSS) in a Sample of End-of-Life Care Nurses.

Noemí Sansó, Gabriel Vidal-Blanco, Laura Galiana
Author Information
  1. Noemí Sansó: Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of the Balearic Islands, 07122 Palma, Spain. ORCID
  2. Gabriel Vidal-Blanco: Department of Nursing, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain. ORCID
  3. Laura Galiana: Department of Methodology for the Behavioral Sciences, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain. ORCID

Abstract

Nursing has been identified as a very stressful profession. Specifically in end-of-life care, nurses frequently experience stressful situations related to death and dying. This study aims to develop and validate a short scale of stress in nurses, the Brief Nursing Stress Scale. A cross-sectional survey of Spanish end-of-life care professionals was conducted; 129 nurses participated. Analyses included a confirmatory factor analysis of the Brief Nursing Stress Scale, estimation of reliability, relation with sex, age and working place, and the estimation of a structural equation model in which BNSS predicted burnout and work satisfaction The confirmatory factor analysis showed an adequate fit: (9) = 20.241 ( = 0.017); CFI = 0.924; SRMR = 0.062; RMSEA = 0.098 [0.040,0.156]. Reliability was 0.712. Women and men showed no differences in stress. Younger nurses and those working in hospital compared to homecare showed higher levels of stress. A structural equation model showed nursing stress positively predicted burnout, which in turn negatively predicted work satisfaction. Nursing stress also had an indirect, negative effect on work satisfaction. The Brief Nursing Stress Scale showed adequate estimates of validity, reliability, and predictive power in a sample of end-of-life care nurses. This is a short, easy-to-use measure that could be employed in major batteries assessing quality of healthcare institutions.

Keywords

References

  1. Appl Nurs Res. 2008 Aug;21(3):139-46 [PMID: 18684407]
  2. J Adv Nurs. 2011 Jul;67(7):1537-46 [PMID: 21261698]
  3. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Mar;110:3-27 [PMID: 30179633]
  4. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2014 Jul;35(7):533-41 [PMID: 24963854]
  5. J Adv Nurs. 2009 Oct;65(10):2175-85 [PMID: 20568322]
  6. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2020 Apr;22(2):115-122 [PMID: 31977534]
  7. PLoS One. 2017 Jun 6;12(6):e0176698 [PMID: 28586391]
  8. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Jan;47(1):30-7 [PMID: 19625023]
  9. Int J Surg. 2014 Dec;12(12):1495-9 [PMID: 25046131]
  10. J Adv Nurs. 2013 Jul;69(7):1515-24 [PMID: 22989323]
  11. Res Nurs Health. 2002 Aug;25(4):282-94 [PMID: 12124722]
  12. Educ Psychol Meas. 2013 Dec;76(6):913-934 [PMID: 25705052]
  13. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Jan 12;12(1):652-66 [PMID: 25588157]
  14. BMC Nurs. 2016 Sep 27;15:56 [PMID: 27708546]
  15. J Nurses Staff Dev. 2011 Mar-Apr;27(2):69-73 [PMID: 21430477]
  16. J Nurs Manag. 2010 Apr;18(3):275-84 [PMID: 20546467]
  17. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2013 May-Jun;32(3):130-7 [PMID: 23571196]
  18. Am Psychol. 1990 Oct;45(10):1142-5 [PMID: 2252232]
  19. J Nurs Manag. 2011 Sep;19(6):760-8 [PMID: 21899629]
  20. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4 [PMID: 24141714]
  21. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Jun;94:21-31 [PMID: 30928718]
  22. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Feb;30(2):202-10 [PMID: 21289340]
  23. J Trauma Nurs. 2018 Jan/Feb;25(1):4-13 [PMID: 29319643]
  24. J Nurs Manag. 2001 Mar;9(2):101-6 [PMID: 11879452]
  25. Nurs Mirror. 1984 Dec 5;159(21):19-22 [PMID: 6569559]
  26. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1987 Feb;13(1):1-8 [PMID: 3554496]
  27. Aust Crit Care. 2018 Nov;31(6):391-395 [PMID: 29248312]
  28. Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(12):1118-26 [PMID: 19918928]
  29. Coll Antropol. 2014 Sep;38(3):879-87 [PMID: 25420369]
  30. Gac Sanit. 1999 May-Jun;13(3):191-200 [PMID: 10477862]
  31. Int J Nurs Stud. 2003 Jul;40(5):555-65; discussion 567-9 [PMID: 12828980]
  32. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2002 May-Jun;19(3):200-5 [PMID: 12026044]
  33. J Nurs Meas. 2000 Fall-Winter;8(2):161-78 [PMID: 11227582]
  34. Contemp Nurse. 2019 Apr - Jun;55(2-3):237-249 [PMID: 31334691]
  35. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Feb;52(2):649-61 [PMID: 25468279]
  36. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Jan;52(1):240-9 [PMID: 25062805]

Grants

  1. RTI2018-094089-I00/FEDER/Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación - Agencia Estatal de Investigación

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0Nursingnursesstress0showed=end-of-lifecareBriefStressScalesatisfactionpredictedburnoutworkstressfulshortconfirmatoryfactoranalysisestimationreliabilityworkingstructuralequationmodelBNSSadequateidentifiedprofessionSpecificallyfrequentlyexperiencesituationsrelateddeathdyingstudyaimsdevelopvalidatescalecross-sectionalsurveySpanishprofessionalsconducted129participatedAnalysesincludedrelationsexageplacefit:920241017CFI924SRMR062RMSEA098[0040156]Reliability712WomenmendifferencesYoungerhospitalcomparedhomecarehigherlevelsnursingpositivelyturnnegativelyalsoindirectnegativeeffectestimatesvaliditypredictivepowersampleeasy-to-usemeasureemployedmajorbatteriesassessingqualityhealthcareinstitutionsDevelopmentValidationSampleEnd-of-LifeCareNursesjob

Similar Articles

Cited By