Perceptions of cervical cancer care among Ethiopian women and their providers: a qualitative study.

Sahai Burrowes, Sarah Jane Holcombe, Cheru Tesema Leshargie, Alexandra Hernandez, Anthony Ho, Molly Galivan, Fatuma Youb, Eiman Mahmoud
Author Information
  1. Sahai Burrowes: Touro University California, Vallejo, CA, USA. sahai.burrowes@tu.edu. ORCID
  2. Sarah Jane Holcombe: Bill & Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
  3. Cheru Tesema Leshargie: Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
  4. Alexandra Hernandez: Touro University California, Vallejo, CA, USA.
  5. Anthony Ho: Touro University California, Vallejo, CA, USA.
  6. Molly Galivan: Touro University California, Vallejo, CA, USA.
  7. Fatuma Youb: Touro University California, Vallejo, CA, USA.
  8. Eiman Mahmoud: Touro University California, Vallejo, CA, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer among Ethiopian women, killing an estimated 4700 women each year. As the government rolls out the country's first national cancer control strategy, information on patient and provider experiences in receiving and providing cervical cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment is critical.
METHODS: This qualitative study aimed to assess the availability of cervical cancer care; explore care barriers and sources of delay; and describe women's and providers' perceptions and experiences of care. We analyzed data from 45 informants collected at 16 health centers, district hospitals and referral hospitals in East Gojjam Zone and a support center in Addis Ababa. Thirty providers and ten women receiving care were interviewed, and five women in treatment or post-treatment participated in a focus group discussion. Deductive and inductive codes were used to thematically analyze data.
RESULTS: Providers lacked equipment and space to screen and treat patients and only 16% had received in-service cervical cancer training. Consequently, few facilities provided screening or preventative treatment. Patients reported low perceptions of risk, high stigma, a lack of knowledge about cervical cancer, and delayed care initiation. All but one patient sought care only when she became symptomatic, and, pre-diagnosis, only half of the patients knew about cervical cancer. Even among those aware of cervical cancer, many assumed they were not at risk because they were not sexually active. Misdiagnosis was another common source of delay experienced by half of the patients. Once diagnosed, women faced multiple-month waits for referrals, and, once in treatment, broken equipment and shortages of hospital beds resulted in additional delays. Barriers to therapeutic treatment included a lack of housing and travel funds. Patient-provider communication of cancer diagnosis was often lacking.
CONCLUSIONS: In-service provider training should be intensified and should include discussions of cervical cancer symptoms. Better distribution of screening and diagnostic supplies to lower-level facilities and better maintenance of treatment equipment at tertiary facilities are also a priority. Expanded cervical cancer health education should focus on stigma reduction and emphasize a broad, wide-spread risk of cervical cancer.

Keywords

References

  1. J Glob Oncol. 2018 Sep;4:1-11 [PMID: 30241262]
  2. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 10;11(3):e0149908 [PMID: 26963098]
  3. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2018 Mar;28(2):111-116 [PMID: 29983508]
  4. Health Syst Reform. 2020 Dec 1;6(1):e1829313 [PMID: 33300838]
  5. BMC Womens Health. 2016 Jun 04;16:29 [PMID: 27259656]
  6. Int J Womens Health. 2015 Jul 31;7:765-72 [PMID: 26261427]
  7. Ethiop Med J. 2015 Apr;53(2):65-74 [PMID: 26591294]
  8. Ecancermedicalscience. 2012;6:270 [PMID: 23008746]
  9. PLoS One. 2020 Apr 28;15(4):e0232291 [PMID: 32343755]
  10. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(4):1699-703 [PMID: 22799391]
  11. BMC Med Educ. 2006 Mar 01;6:13 [PMID: 16509979]
  12. PLoS One. 2010 Jun 10;5(6):e11059 [PMID: 20548787]
  13. Int J Cancer. 2000 May 1;86(3):440-7 [PMID: 10760836]
  14. Public Health Rep. 2010 Mar-Apr;125(2):272-81 [PMID: 20297756]
  15. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 May;105(2):335-40 [PMID: 17258801]
  16. Lancet. 2019 Jun 15;393(10189):2440-2454 [PMID: 31155275]
  17. Psychol Health. 2010 Dec;25(10):1229-45 [PMID: 20204937]
  18. PLoS One. 2020 May 5;15(5):e0232076 [PMID: 32369511]
  19. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Nov 10;11(11):11541-52 [PMID: 25390794]
  20. Int J Womens Health. 2017 May 22;9:365-372 [PMID: 28579837]
  21. Am J Public Health. 2015 Aug;105(8):1581-7 [PMID: 26066939]
  22. BMC Cancer. 2013 Jan 02;13:2 [PMID: 23282173]
  23. Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):847-860 [PMID: 27814965]
  24. Soc Sci Med. 2019 May;228:60-67 [PMID: 30884423]
  25. BMC Res Notes. 2015 Nov 07;8:657 [PMID: 26547548]
  26. Syst Rev. 2013 May 24;2:35 [PMID: 23706117]
  27. BMC Cancer. 2013 Feb 08;13:69 [PMID: 23391288]
  28. BMC Womens Health. 2011 Oct 18;11:45 [PMID: 22008186]
  29. Oncologist. 2014 Jul;19(7):727-34 [PMID: 24951611]
  30. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(2):127-32 [PMID: 11242819]
  31. PLoS One. 2017 Jul 25;12(7):e0181415 [PMID: 28742851]
  32. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Jan;26(1): [PMID: 26853214]
  33. Infect Agent Cancer. 2017 Nov 29;12:61 [PMID: 29213299]
  34. Reprod Health. 2018 Feb 14;15(1):29 [PMID: 29444689]
  35. Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Nov;6(11):e1196-e1252 [PMID: 30196093]
  36. PLoS One. 2016 Sep 30;11(9):e0163136 [PMID: 27690311]
  37. Int J Equity Health. 2012 Dec 29;11:83 [PMID: 23273140]

Grants

  1. IRAP-2016/17/Touro University California

MeSH Term

Early Detection of Cancer
Ethiopia
Female
Focus Groups
Humans
Qualitative Research
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cancercervicalcarewomentreatmentamongscreeningequipmentpatientsfacilitiesriskCervicaldiagnosedEthiopianpatientproviderexperiencesreceivingdiagnosisqualitativestudydelayperceptionsdatahealthhospitalsfocustrainingstigmalackhalfBACKGROUND:secondcommonlykillingestimated4700yeargovernmentrollscountry'sfirstnationalcontrolstrategyinformationprovidingcriticalMETHODS:aimedassessavailabilityexplorebarrierssourcesdescribewomen'sproviders'analyzed45informantscollected16centersdistrictreferralEastGojjamZonesupportcenterAddisAbabaThirtyprovidersteninterviewedfivepost-treatmentparticipatedgroupdiscussionDeductiveinductivecodesusedthematicallyanalyzeRESULTS:Providerslackedspacescreentreat16%receivedin-serviceConsequentlyprovidedpreventativePatientsreportedlowhighknowledgedelayedinitiationonesoughtbecamesymptomaticpre-diagnosisknewEvenawaremanyassumedsexuallyactiveMisdiagnosisanothercommonsourceexperiencedfacedmultiple-monthwaitsreferralsbrokenshortageshospitalbedsresultedadditionaldelaysBarrierstherapeuticincludedhousingtravelfundsPatient-providercommunicationoftenlackingCONCLUSIONS:In-serviceintensifiedincludediscussionssymptomsBetterdistributiondiagnosticsupplieslower-levelbettermaintenancetertiaryalsopriorityExpandededucationreductionemphasizebroadwide-spreadPerceptionsproviders:EthiopiaPatientexperienceQualityStigma

Similar Articles

Cited By