Blood-Based Biomarker Panel for Personalized Lung Cancer Risk Assessment.

Johannes F Fahrmann, Tracey Marsh, Ehsan Irajizad, Nikul Patel, Eunice Murage, Jody Vykoukal, Jennifer B Dennison, Kim-Anh Do, Edwin Ostrin, Margaret R Spitz, Stephen Lam, Sanjay Shete, Rafael Meza, Martin C Tammem��gi, Ziding Feng, Samir M Hanash
Author Information
  1. Johannes F Fahrmann: Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. ORCID
  2. Tracey Marsh: Biostatistics Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA. ORCID
  3. Ehsan Irajizad: Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  4. Nikul Patel: Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  5. Eunice Murage: Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. ORCID
  6. Jody Vykoukal: Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. ORCID
  7. Jennifer B Dennison: Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  8. Kim-Anh Do: Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  9. Edwin Ostrin: Department of Pulmonary Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. ORCID
  10. Margaret R Spitz: Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
  11. Stephen Lam: Department of Integrative Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. ORCID
  12. Sanjay Shete: Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
  13. Rafael Meza: Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI. ORCID
  14. Martin C Tammem��gi: Prevention and Cancer Control, Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ORCID
  15. Ziding Feng: Biostatistics Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
  16. Samir M Hanash: Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. ORCID

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether a panel of circulating protein biomarkers would improve risk assessment for lung cancer screening in combination with a risk model on the basis of participant characteristics.
METHODS: A blinded validation study was performed using prostate lung colorectal ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial data and biospecimens to evaluate the performance of a four-marker protein panel (4MP) consisting of the precursor form of surfactant protein B, cancer antigen 125, carcinoembryonic antigen, and cytokeratin-19 fragment in combination with a lung cancer risk prediction model (PLCO) compared with current US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) screening criteria. The 4MP was assayed in 1,299 sera collected preceding lung cancer diagnosis and 8,709 noncase sera.
RESULTS: The 4MP alone yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.82) for case sera collected within 1-year preceding diagnosis and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.76) among the entire specimen set. The combined 4MP + PLCO model yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.82 to 0.88) for case sera collected within 1 year preceding diagnosis. The benefit of the 4MP in the combined model resulted from improvement in sensitivity at high specificity. Compared with the USPSTF2021 criteria, the combined 4MP + PLCO model exhibited statistically significant improvements in sensitivity and specificity. Among PLCO participants with ��� 10 smoking pack-years, the 4MP + PLCO model would have identified for annual screening 9.2% more lung cancer cases and would have reduced referral by 13.7% among noncases compared with USPSTF2021 criteria.
CONCLUSION: A blood-based biomarker panel in combination with PLCO significantly improves lung cancer risk assessment for lung cancer screening.

References

  1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 May 1;112(5):466-479 [PMID: 31566216]
  2. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2015;10(3):212-22 [PMID: 26238117]
  3. Int J Cancer. 2017 Jul 15;141(2):242-253 [PMID: 28249359]
  4. J Med Screen. 2012 Sep;19(3):154-6 [PMID: 23060474]
  5. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2015 Sep;8(9):777-85 [PMID: 26076698]
  6. N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 6;371(19):1793-802 [PMID: 25372087]
  7. Lung Cancer Manag. 2014;3(6):491-498 [PMID: 26617677]
  8. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;35(10):899-912 [PMID: 32594286]
  9. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Aug 2;113(8):1044-1052 [PMID: 33176362]
  10. N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 4;365(5):395-409 [PMID: 21714641]
  11. PLoS One. 2016 Aug 10;11(8):e0159880 [PMID: 27509046]
  12. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Nov;18(11):1523-1531 [PMID: 29055736]
  13. PLoS Med. 2014 Dec 02;11(12):e1001764 [PMID: 25460915]
  14. Thorax. 2019 Jul;74(7):700-704 [PMID: 30420406]
  15. MDM Policy Pract. 2016 Jul-Dec;1(1): [PMID: 30148212]
  16. N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 21;368(8):728-36 [PMID: 23425165]
  17. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jun 24;12(6): [PMID: 32599792]
  18. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Dec 20;31(36):4536-43 [PMID: 24248694]
  19. Lifetime Data Anal. 2013 Apr;19(2):170-201 [PMID: 23358916]
  20. JAMA Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;4(10):e182078 [PMID: 30003238]
  21. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 May 1;179(5):716-718 [PMID: 30640388]
  22. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Dec;18(12):e754-e766 [PMID: 29208441]
  23. JAMA. 2021 Mar 09;325(10):962-970 [PMID: 33687470]
  24. Radiology. 2011 Jan;258(1):243-53 [PMID: 21045183]
  25. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 6;382(6):503-513 [PMID: 31995683]
  26. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Apr;17(4):503-512 [PMID: 32011914]
  27. Stata J. 2009 Mar 1;9(1):1 [PMID: 20161343]
  28. JAMA. 2011 Nov 2;306(17):1865-73 [PMID: 22031728]
  29. Lung Cancer. 2020 Sep;147:154-186 [PMID: 32721652]
  30. J Thorac Oncol. 2021 Feb;16(2):228-236 [PMID: 33137463]
  31. Chest. 2019 Jan;155(1):21-24 [PMID: 30359617]
  32. N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 5;369(10):920-31 [PMID: 24004119]
  33. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013 Oct;22(10):1756-61 [PMID: 23897585]
  34. Ann Intern Med. 2020 May 19;172(10):706-707 [PMID: 32422089]
  35. JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):988-997 [PMID: 33687469]
  36. Control Clin Trials. 2000 Dec;21(6 Suppl):273S-309S [PMID: 11189684]
  37. Cancer. 2021 Mar 1;127(5):748-756 [PMID: 33206388]

Grants

  1. U01 CA200468/NCI NIH HHS
  2. U01 CA213285/NCI NIH HHS
  3. P30 CA016672/NCI NIH HHS
  4. U01 CA194733/NCI NIH HHS
  5. U24 CA086368/NCI NIH HHS
  6. U01 CA086368/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Clinical Trials as Topic
Early Detection of Cancer
Humans
Lung
Lung Neoplasms
Male
Mass Screening
Risk Assessment

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.00lungcancerPLCO4MPmodelriskscreeningserapanelproteincombinationcriteriacollectedprecedingdiagnosis95%CIcombined+assessmentCancerantigencompared1yieldedareareceiveroperatingcharacteristiccurve82casewithinamongsensitivityspecificityUSPSTF2021PURPOSE:investigatewhethercirculatingbiomarkersimprovebasisparticipantcharacteristicsMETHODS:blindedvalidationstudyperformedusingprostatecolorectalovarianScreeningTrialdatabiospecimensevaluateperformancefour-markerconsistingprecursorformsurfactantB125carcinoembryoniccytokeratin-19fragmentpredictioncurrentUSPreventiveServicesTaskForceUSPSTFassayed2998709noncaseRESULTS:alone79771-year747276entirespecimenset8588yearbenefitresultedimprovementhighComparedexhibitedstatisticallysignificantimprovementsAmongparticipants���10smokingpack-yearsidentifiedannual92%casesreducedreferral137%noncasesCONCLUSION:blood-basedbiomarkersignificantlyimprovesBlood-BasedBiomarkerPanelPersonalizedLungRiskAssessment

Similar Articles

Cited By