Smoking cessation rate and factors affecting the success of quitting in a smoking cessation clinic using telephone follow-up.

Jianghua Xie, Rui Zhong, Lei Zhu, Xiaochang Chang, Jianhua Chen, Wei Wang, Lemeng Zhang, Ouying Chen, Xinhua Yu, Yanhui Zou, Yanqun Li
Author Information
  1. Jianghua Xie: Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha City, China.
  2. Rui Zhong: Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha City, China.
  3. Lei Zhu: School of Nursing, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha City, China.
  4. Xiaochang Chang: Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha City, China.
  5. Jianhua Chen: Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha City, China.
  6. Wei Wang: Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha City, China.
  7. Lemeng Zhang: Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha City, China.
  8. Ouying Chen: School of Nursing, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha City, China.
  9. Xinhua Yu: Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha City, China.
  10. Yanhui Zou: Hunan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha City, China.
  11. Yanqun Li: Department of Geriatrics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha City, China.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: China has the largest number of smokers in the world. The great majority of China's smokers desire to quit smoking (QS); however, the success rate of self-quitting is low. This study investigated the effects of smoking cessation (SC) clinics in a cancer hospital in Hunan province and determined the influencing factors of successful SC.
METHODS: Smokers were recruited to QS by healthcare workers in the SC clinic from February 2015 to February 2019. SC counseling was provided and telephone follow-up was conducted at 1 week, and at 1, 3 and 6 months. Patients who continued SC during the follow-up period were considered to have QS.
RESULTS: Of the 344 patients included in this study, 16.3% QS at one week, 26.5% at one month, 27.6% at three months, and 31.7% at six months. Age ≥60 years, previous SC attempts, immediate quit dates, and telephone follow-up times (3-4 calls) were predictive factors for smokers to SC at six months.
CONCLUSIONS: Age, previous attempts to QS, immediate quit dates and telephone follow-up times were independent predictors of SC success at six months. SC clinics and frequent telephone follow-up improve the success rate of SC, especially in patients who have previously tried to QS or in those who set immediate quit dates.

Keywords

References

  1. J Behav Med. 2020 Apr;43(2):318-328 [PMID: 31396821]
  2. Tob Prev Cessat. 2019 Nov 07;5:47 [PMID: 32411909]
  3. BMC Public Health. 2013 Mar 22;13:263 [PMID: 23521839]
  4. BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 09;6(6):e011045 [PMID: 27288378]
  5. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Oct;12 Suppl:S34-44 [PMID: 20889478]
  6. Tob Control. 1997;6 Suppl 2:S57-62 [PMID: 9583654]
  7. BMJ. 2006 Feb 25;332(7539):458-60 [PMID: 16443610]
  8. Tob Control. 2001 Jun;10(2):165-9 [PMID: 11387538]
  9. J Community Health. 2020 Jun;45(3):526-533 [PMID: 31773565]
  10. Clin Chest Med. 1991 Dec;12(4):727-35 [PMID: 1747990]
  11. Addiction. 2011 Jul;106(7):1335-45 [PMID: 21438942]
  12. Tob Induc Dis. 2020 Oct 16;18:86 [PMID: 33117113]
  13. Am J Prev Med. 2016 Oct;51(4):566-77 [PMID: 27647057]
  14. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2019 Feb 22;14(1):10 [PMID: 30795811]
  15. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2017 Mar;48(2):421-8 [PMID: 29642304]
  16. J Public Health (Oxf). 2010 Jun;32(2):267-76 [PMID: 19939788]
  17. Front Public Health. 2021 Mar 19;9:615817 [PMID: 33816416]
  18. Addiction. 2010 Jan;105(1):164-73 [PMID: 19919598]
  19. Hong Kong Med J. 2016 Apr;22(2):158-64 [PMID: 26586081]
  20. Respir Care. 2008 Sep;53(9):1217-22 [PMID: 18807274]
  21. Lancet. 2015 Oct 10;386(10002):1447-56 [PMID: 26466050]
  22. Lancet. 2013 Jan 12;381(9861):133-41 [PMID: 23107252]
  23. Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Oct 01;19(10):1155-1162 [PMID: 28031378]
  24. Addiction. 2014 Nov;109(11):1942-52 [PMID: 24962451]
  25. Addiction. 2005 Nov;100(11):1731-40 [PMID: 16277633]
  26. BMC Public Health. 2016 Jan 22;16:63 [PMID: 26801402]
  27. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 Oct;14(10):1197-204 [PMID: 22387995]
  28. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 28;17(17): [PMID: 32872132]
  29. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(3):CD001292 [PMID: 12137623]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0SCsmokingQSfollow-upquitcessationtelephonemonthssuccessratesmokersfactorsclinicsiximmediatedatesstudyclinicsFebruary1weekpatientsoneAgepreviousattemptstimespredictorsINTRODUCTION:ChinalargestnumberworldgreatmajorityChina'sdesirehoweverself-quittinglowinvestigatedeffectscancerhospitalHunanprovincedeterminedinfluencingsuccessfulMETHODS:Smokersrecruitedhealthcareworkers20152019counselingprovidedconducted36PatientscontinuedperiodconsideredRESULTS:344included163%265%month276%three317%≥60years3-4callspredictiveCONCLUSIONS:independentfrequentimproveespeciallypreviouslytriedsetSmokingaffectingquittingusing

Similar Articles

Cited By