Preliminary Support for a Cognitive Remediation Intervention for Women During the Menopausal Transition: A Pilot Study.

Elena C Ballantyne, Jelena P King, Sheryl M Green
Author Information
  1. Elena C Ballantyne: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
  2. Jelena P King: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
  3. Sheryl M Green: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Abstract

Menopause is associated with physical and emotional symptoms, and subjective cognitive concerns that are generally not borne out on objective cognitive measures. This discrepancy suggests that a psychological rather than biological mechanism likely mediates the cognitive concerns of women in Menopause. The current study assessed the feasibility and effectiveness of a cognitive remediation intervention with the goal of reducing subjective perceptions of cognitive difficulty during the Menopause. Twenty-seven menopausal women (M age = 53.74, SD = 4.14) completed a 5-week group-based intervention (with a post-group booster) consisting of 2-h weekly sessions. Participants completed pre- and post-intervention measures capturing subjective cognitive ability, mood, anxiety, stress, personality, and objective cognitive tests. The primary variable of interest was self-reported cognitive confidence measured by the Memory and Cognitive Confidence Scale (MACCS). All but one MACCS subscale significantly decreased over the course of treatment (with lower scores associated with higher confidence) and effect sizes ranged from small to large (d = -0.39 to -0.91) with gains maintained at 1-month follow-up. Interestingly, no change in objective cognitive test performance was observed, indicating increases in subjective cognitive confidence in the absence of objective cognitive improvement. There was no change in mood, anxiety, or stress scores. Two-level HLM analyses revealed that those with higher baseline neuroticism, as measured by the NEO Personality Inventory, had smaller decreases in post-group MACCS High Standards subscale relative to those with lower baseline neuroticism ( = 0.027, d = -0.45). Those with higher baseline depression scores on the depression anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21) had a smaller decrease in post-intervention MACCS Total Score relative to those with lower depression ratings. To our knowledge, this is the first feasibility study of its kind targeting perceptions of cognitive impairment during Menopause. Although generally well-tolerated, recruitment and scheduling difficulties were flagged as challenges to engagement while a small sample size and lack of control group limit conclusions about efficacy. Providing current results could be replicated with enhanced methods, these results provide support that cognitive remediation is a feasible and credible treatment, and may improve quality of life for women in Menopause. www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03311880.

Keywords

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT03311880

References

  1. Neurology. 2009 May 26;72(21):1850-7 [PMID: 19470968]
  2. Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks). 2019 Apr 18;3:2470547019841599 [PMID: 32440592]
  3. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012 Mar;27(2):176-81 [PMID: 22277127]
  4. Menopause. 2013 Dec;20(12):1236-42 [PMID: 23676633]
  5. Maturitas. 2005 Nov-Dec;52(3-4):264-76 [PMID: 15921865]
  6. Horm Behav. 2015 Aug;74:167-72 [PMID: 25935728]
  7. Menopause. 2016 Dec;23(12):1319-1329 [PMID: 27483039]
  8. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2001 May;10(4):351-62 [PMID: 11445026]
  9. Menopause. 2019 Sep;26(9):972-980 [PMID: 31453958]
  10. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:22-33;quiz 34-57 [PMID: 9881538]
  11. Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Jun 1;171(11):1214-24 [PMID: 20442205]
  12. Neurology. 2003 Sep 23;61(6):801-6 [PMID: 14504324]
  13. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Jul;58(7):1263-71 [PMID: 20649689]
  14. Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;192(1):52-8 [PMID: 18174510]
  15. Maturitas. 2014 Feb;77(2):93-110 [PMID: 24289897]
  16. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002 Oct;59(10):877-83 [PMID: 12365874]
  17. Gerontologist. 2016 Oct;56(5):877-85 [PMID: 26035897]
  18. Brain Inj. 2015;29(11):1292-9 [PMID: 26084318]
  19. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Jun;29(6):782-9 [PMID: 15189633]
  20. Menopause. 2014 Oct;21(10):1038-62 [PMID: 25225714]
  21. Br J Clin Psychol. 1995 Nov;34(4):589-99 [PMID: 8563666]
  22. Innov Aging. 2020 Oct 26;4(6):igaa054 [PMID: 33336083]
  23. Neurology. 2018 May 8;90(19):e1673-e1681 [PMID: 29643079]
  24. Behav Res Ther. 2005 Jan;43(1):15-27 [PMID: 15531350]
  25. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2002 Jun;24(4):448-57 [PMID: 12187458]
  26. Womens Health. 1997 Summer;3(2):103-20 [PMID: 9332153]
  27. Aging Ment Health. 2013;17(7):806-15 [PMID: 23611105]
  28. JAMA. 2020 Apr 21;323(15):1495-1496 [PMID: 32163094]
  29. Br J Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;134:382-9 [PMID: 444788]
  30. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Mar;60(3):456-70 [PMID: 2027080]
  31. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2016 Dec;134(6):511-521 [PMID: 27644707]
  32. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;71(1):36-43 [PMID: 24227182]
  33. Assessment. 2003 Dec;10(4):420-7 [PMID: 14682488]
  34. Clin Psychol Rev. 2007 Jul 1;27(6):679-681 [PMID: 21984860]
  35. Maturitas. 2006 Mar 20;53(4):447-53 [PMID: 16198073]
  36. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Apr;175(4):531-9 [PMID: 25686030]
  37. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2011 Sep;38(3):519-35 [PMID: 21961718]
  38. Psychol Med. 2011 Sep;41(9):1879-88 [PMID: 21306662]
  39. BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Apr 19;16:108 [PMID: 27095362]
  40. Sleep. 2007 Sep;30(9):1205-11 [PMID: 17910392]
  41. Menopause. 2015 Jul;22(7):694-701 [PMID: 25706184]
  42. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Sep;98(9):3829-38 [PMID: 23836935]
  43. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 May;21(4):327-37 [PMID: 16769198]
  44. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Dec;39(4):281-288 [PMID: 28937311]
  45. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0169008 [PMID: 28045986]
  46. J Psychiatr Res. 2005 Mar;39(2):207-14 [PMID: 15589570]
  47. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Sep;51(3):618-26 [PMID: 18677155]
  48. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2013 Nov;22(11):983-90 [PMID: 24083674]
  49. Nat Sci Sleep. 2018 Feb 09;10:73-95 [PMID: 29445307]
  50. Menopause. 2019 Dec;26(12):1366-1374 [PMID: 31613825]
  51. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2014 Jul;142:90-8 [PMID: 23770320]
  52. Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 1):1003-13 [PMID: 15968015]
  53. BMC Womens Health. 2020 Aug 14;20(1):177 [PMID: 32795281]
  54. Exp Gerontol. 1994 May-Aug;29(3-4):307-17 [PMID: 7925751]
  55. Integr Med Insights. 2014 Aug 03;9:17-23 [PMID: 25125972]
  56. J Psychiatr Pract. 2020 Jul;26(4):273-283 [PMID: 32692124]
  57. Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Jul 1;178(1):70-83 [PMID: 23788671]
  58. Post Reprod Health. 2019 Dec;25(4):200-206 [PMID: 31690174]
  59. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993 Jan;7(1):33-45 [PMID: 8435056]
  60. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004 Jul;10(4):623-33 [PMID: 15327740]
  61. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2021 Aug;31(7):1105-1129 [PMID: 32408846]
  62. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2000 Mar;6(3):299-312 [PMID: 10824502]
  63. Menopause. 2011 Jun;18(6):611-20 [PMID: 21372745]
  64. Menopause. 2006 Jan-Feb;13(1):19-27 [PMID: 16607095]
  65. J Affect Disord. 2008 Feb;106(1-2):1-27 [PMID: 17707915]
  66. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1997 Aug;19(4):587-603 [PMID: 9342691]
  67. Menopause. 2012 Jul;19(7):735-41 [PMID: 22415562]
  68. Aging Ment Health. 2021 Mar;25(3):567-574 [PMID: 31814426]
  69. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2002 Jan;17(1):57-67 [PMID: 14589753]
  70. Behav Res Ther. 2007 Dec;45(12):2899-914 [PMID: 17868642]
  71. Psychol Health Med. 2018 Jan;23(1):99-105 [PMID: 28537088]
  72. JAMA. 2003 May 28;289(20):2663-72 [PMID: 12771113]
  73. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 15;11(3):e0150205 [PMID: 26978655]
  74. Womens Health (Lond). 2013 May;9(3):279-90 [PMID: 23638783]
  75. PLoS Med. 2015 Jun 02;12(6):e1001833; discussion e1001833 [PMID: 26035291]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cognitivemenopause=subjectiveobjectiveconfidenceMACCSwomenremediationlowerscoreshigher-0baselineassociatedconcernsgenerallymeasurescurrentstudyfeasibilityinterventionperceptionscompletedpost-grouppost-interventionmoodanxietystressmeasuredCognitiveScalesubscaletreatmentsmalldchangeneuroticismsmallerrelativedepressionresultsMenopausephysicalemotionalsymptomsbornediscrepancysuggestspsychologicalratherbiologicalmechanismlikelymediatesassessedeffectivenessgoalreducingdifficultyTwenty-sevenmenopausalMage5374SD4145-weekgroup-basedboosterconsisting2-hweeklysessionsParticipantspre-capturingabilitypersonalitytestsprimaryvariableinterestself-reportedMemoryConfidenceonesignificantlydecreasedcourseeffectsizesrangedlarge3991gainsmaintained1-monthfollow-upInterestinglytestperformanceobservedindicatingincreasesabsenceimprovementTwo-levelHLManalysesrevealedNEOPersonalityInventorydecreasesHighStandards002745DepressionAnxietyStressDASS-21decreaseTotalScoreratingsknowledgefirstkindtargetingimpairmentAlthoughwell-toleratedrecruitmentschedulingdifficultiesflaggedchallengesengagementsamplesizelackcontrolgrouplimitconclusionsefficacyProvidingreplicatedenhancedmethodsprovidesupportfeasiblecrediblemayimprovequalitylifewwwClinicalTrialsgovidentifier:NCT03311880PreliminarySupportRemediationInterventionWomenMenopausalTransition:PilotStudycognitionneuropsychologywomen'shealth

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)