Psychometric Validation of the Persian Self-Compassion Scale Youth Version.

Nabi Nazari, Ronald M Hernández, Yolvi Ocaña-Fernandez, Mark D Griffiths
Author Information
  1. Nabi Nazari: Department of Psychology, Faculty of Human Sciences, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran. ORCID
  2. Ronald M Hernández: Unidad de Virtualización Académica, Universidad de San Martin de Porres, Lima, Peru.
  3. Yolvi Ocaña-Fernandez: Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista, Lima, Peru.
  4. Mark D Griffiths: International Gaming Research Unit, Psychology Division, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.

Abstract

Objectives: Empirical research investigating self-compassion is a rapidly developing field, and it is potentially crucial in early adolescence. The primary aim of the present study was to psychometrically evaluate the Persian translation of the Self-Compassion Scale Youth version (SCS-Y) and evaluate its factor structure among young adolescents. The second aim was to explore the buffering effect of self-compassion against the negative effect of difficulties in emotion regulation on COVID-19-related anxiety.
Methods: A sample of young students ( = 532; mean age 13.57 years) completed an online survey, which included the SCS-Y, Patient Health Questionnaire, Difficulties In Emotion Regulation Scale, Coronavirus Anxiety Scale, Youth Life Orientation Test, Brief Resilience Scale, and Brief 10-Item Big Five Inventory. First-order (six-factor) confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and bi-factor exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) analysis were used to evaluate the factor structure of the SCS-Y.
Results: Results showed that the SCS-Y had very good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient: 0.88; McDonald's omega coefficient: 0.90), composite reliability (0.87), and adequate test-retest reliability after 4 weeks (0.60). The first-order (six-factor) CFA and bi-factor ESEM analysis demonstrated the SCS-Y had excellent dimensionality. Further analysis found negative associations between self-compassion with both depression and neuroticism, and positive associations between self-compassion with both resilience and optimism. Moreover, self-compassion moderated the association between emotion dysregulation and anxiety generated by the COVID-19. Overall, the findings indicated that the SCS-Y had acceptable criterion-related validity, convergent validity, and discriminant validity.
Conclusions: The findings provide evidence that the SCS-Y is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the six factors of self-compassion among younger adolescents. Based on the study's findings, self-compassion appears to be a protective factor against mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic for younger adolescents.

Keywords

References

  1. Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60 [PMID: 19897823]
  2. J Youth Adolesc. 2017 Apr;46(4):840-853 [PMID: 27632177]
  3. J Affect Disord. 2020 Nov 1;276:667-677 [PMID: 32871699]
  4. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2018 Jan 1;56(1):15-17 [PMID: 29328351]
  5. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 9;23(6):e26285 [PMID: 34014833]
  6. Mindfulness (N Y). 2016 Dec;7(6):1377-1384 [PMID: 28042346]
  7. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 05;11:585270 [PMID: 33250793]
  8. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2021 May-Aug;21(2):100229 [PMID: 33767736]
  9. Assessment. 2021 Jan;28(1):169-185 [PMID: 32475146]
  10. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005 May;46(5):548-58 [PMID: 15845134]
  11. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2012;25(5):543-58 [PMID: 21895450]
  12. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2021 May 14;:1-16 [PMID: 34007255]
  13. Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Feb 15;170:110457 [PMID: 33100455]
  14. J Adolesc. 2018 Dec;69:163-174 [PMID: 30326397]
  15. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;20(3):1537-1545 [PMID: 32226353]
  16. J Adolesc. 2019 Jul;74:210-220 [PMID: 31254780]
  17. Int J Psychol. 2017 Dec;52 Suppl 1:45-56 [PMID: 27000535]
  18. Mindfulness (N Y). 2018;9(4):1011-1027 [PMID: 30100930]
  19. Pers Individ Dif. 2019 Jun 01;143:36-41 [PMID: 32042216]
  20. J Adolesc. 2016 Jun;49:204-17 [PMID: 27107398]
  21. Eat Weight Disord. 2022 Feb;27(1):179-188 [PMID: 33713336]
  22. Cognit Ther Res. 2017;41(3):459-468 [PMID: 28515539]
  23. Curr Psychol. 2020 Nov 26;:1-13 [PMID: 33262561]
  24. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91 [PMID: 11124735]
  25. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Mar;214(1):55-70 [PMID: 20865251]
  26. Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 23;11(1):13169 [PMID: 34162979]
  27. J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Jan;49(1):192-211 [PMID: 31598809]
  28. Int J Behav Med. 2008;15(3):194-200 [PMID: 18696313]
  29. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2018 Jul;10(2):215-235 [PMID: 29673093]
  30. J Posit Psychol. 2015;10(3):219-230 [PMID: 25750655]
  31. Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Feb 1;169:110109 [PMID: 32394994]
  32. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2016 Dec;25(4):277-288 [PMID: 26265387]
  33. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2015 May;43(4):645-53 [PMID: 25234347]
  34. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2019 Sep;26(5):511-530 [PMID: 31046164]
  35. Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Mar;65:37-47 [PMID: 28110110]
  36. Integr Med Res. 2016 Jun;5(2):105-109 [PMID: 28462104]
  37. Death Stud. 2020;44(7):393-401 [PMID: 32299304]
  38. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2010 Feb 1;4(2):107-118 [PMID: 20686629]
  39. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2018 Dec 4;13(12):1317-1326 [PMID: 30395315]
  40. J Child Fam Stud. 2018 Sep;27(9):3037-3047 [PMID: 34079199]
  41. Psychol Bull. 2017 Sep;143(9):939-991 [PMID: 28616996]
  42. Psychol Assess. 2019 Jan;31(1):27-45 [PMID: 30124303]
  43. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:85-110 [PMID: 24313568]
  44. J Pers Assess. 2021 Jan-Feb;103(1):92-105 [PMID: 32125190]
  45. New Dir Youth Dev. 2014 Summer;2014(142):9-30 [PMID: 25100492]
  46. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2015 Nov;7(3):340-64 [PMID: 26311196]
  47. Behav Anal Pract. 2020 May 6;14(4):1092-1098 [PMID: 32377315]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0self-compassionSCS-YScalefactoranalysis0evaluateYouthadolescentsCOVID-19findingsvalidityaimPersianSelf-CompassionstructureamongyoungeffectnegativeemotionregulationanxietyEmotionBriefsix-factorCFAbi-factorESEMcoefficient:reliabilityassociationsyoungerObjectives:EmpiricalresearchinvestigatingrapidlydevelopingfieldpotentiallycrucialearlyadolescenceprimarypresentstudypsychometricallytranslationversionsecondexplorebufferingdifficultiesCOVID-19-relatedMethods:samplestudents = 532meanage1357 yearscompletedonlinesurveyincludedPatientHealthQuestionnaireDifficultiesRegulationCoronavirusAnxietyLifeOrientationTestResilience10-ItemBigFiveInventoryFirst-orderconfirmatoryexploratorystructuralequationmodelingusedResults:ResultsshowedgoodinternalconsistencyCronbach'salpha88McDonald'somega90composite87adequatetest-retest4 weeks60first-orderdemonstratedexcellentdimensionalityfounddepressionneuroticismpositiveresilienceoptimismMoreovermoderatedassociationdysregulationgeneratedOverallindicatedacceptablecriterion-relatedconvergentdiscriminantConclusions:provideevidencereliablevalidinstrumentassessingsixfactorsBasedstudy'sappearsprotectivementalhealthproblemspandemicPsychometricValidationVersionAdolescentsOptimismPersonalitySelf-compassion

Similar Articles

Cited By