Effects of different exercise programs on cardiorespiratory fitness and body composition in college students.

Chao Lan, Yujie Liu, Yan Wang
Author Information
  1. Chao Lan: School of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, 100084, China.
  2. Yujie Liu: School of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, 100084, China.
  3. Yan Wang: School of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, 100084, China.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) of college students is showing a downward trend, this study aimed to explore the effects of three exercise programs on CRF and body composition indicators in college students.
METHODS: A total of 50 non-smoking, healthy and physically inactive students were recruited from campus in Beijing, China, and randomly assigned to 4 groups: low-intensity continuous training with blood flow restriction (LICT-BFR, n = 13), moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT, n = 13), high-intensity interval training (HIIT, n = 12), and no exercise control (n = 12), the intervention continued for 8 weeks. Body composition and aerobic capacity were measured before and after the intervention.
RESULTS: Exercise groups reached significant improvements in maximal oxygen uptake (VOmax,  < 0.01) and a decrease in body fat percentage ( < 0.05) comparing to the control group. The fat mass and visceral fat area reduced significantly ( < 0.05) with a muscle mass growth ( < 0.05) in the LICT-BFR and MICT groups comparing to the control group. Changes of fat and muscle mass were trivial in the HIIT group ( = 0.842,  = 0.247).
CONCLUSION: All three exercise programs can improve the CRF of college students, with LICT-BFR has the most profound effects, and MICT is more beneficial for body composition improvement than other programs. From an overall perspective, LICT-BFR should be the ideal choice, however, due to limited equipment, college students can choose MICT or HIIT according to their situations.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 08;16(19): [PMID: 31597246]
  2. Herz. 2006 Sep;31(6):553-8 [PMID: 17036186]
  3. Sports Med. 2012 Jun 1;42(6):489-509 [PMID: 22587821]
  4. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2009 Jul;107(1):128-38 [PMID: 19443744]
  5. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014 Feb;114(2):331-43 [PMID: 24281825]
  6. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015 Feb;115(2):397-405 [PMID: 25338316]
  7. Obes Rev. 2019 Jan;20(1):142-155 [PMID: 30450794]
  8. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Jan;34(1):92-7 [PMID: 11782653]
  9. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Nov;31(11):812-817 [PMID: 32967776]
  10. BMJ. 2018 Jul 3;362:k2575 [PMID: 29970408]
  11. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995 Sep;27(9):1292-301 [PMID: 8531628]
  12. Am J Sports Med. 2021 Jun;49(7):1938-1944 [PMID: 33196300]
  13. Eur J Sport Sci. 2021 Mar;21(3):450-459 [PMID: 32349629]
  14. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1985 Apr;58(4):1115-21 [PMID: 3988668]
  15. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005 Sep;95(1):65-73 [PMID: 15959798]
  16. J Strength Cond Res. 2016 May;30(5):1453-61 [PMID: 26439780]
  17. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Apr;39(4):665-71 [PMID: 17414804]
  18. N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 9;343(19):1355-61 [PMID: 11070099]
  19. Sports Med. 2018 Feb;48(2):269-288 [PMID: 29127602]
  20. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Mar;38(3):504-12 [PMID: 16540838]
  21. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Oct;48(20):1489-96 [PMID: 24782484]
  22. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 31;17(15): [PMID: 32752122]
  23. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 17;17(14): [PMID: 32709003]
  24. Nutrients. 2020 May 28;12(6): [PMID: 32481594]
  25. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999 Sep;87(3):1003-8 [PMID: 10484570]
  26. Sports Med. 2015 Oct;45(10):1469-81 [PMID: 26243014]
  27. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Jul;43(7):1334-59 [PMID: 21694556]
  28. Can J Sport Sci. 1992 Jun;17(2):129-34 [PMID: 1324106]
  29. BMJ. 2019 Oct 16;367:l5584 [PMID: 31619383]
  30. Sports Med. 2020 Jan;50(1):73-81 [PMID: 31559565]
  31. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013 Jan;113(1):147-55 [PMID: 22615009]
  32. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 May;112(5):1849-59 [PMID: 21922259]
  33. Physiol Rev. 2013 Jan;93(1):359-404 [PMID: 23303913]
  34. Circulation. 2020 Aug 18;142(7):e101-e118 [PMID: 32686505]
  35. Front Physiol. 2019 Jun 26;10:810 [PMID: 31297065]
  36. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 17;22(6):e20185 [PMID: 32519963]
  37. Sports Med. 2006;36(9):747-65 [PMID: 16937951]
  38. Circulation. 2016 Dec 13;134(24):e653-e699 [PMID: 27881567]
  39. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Oct;49(19):1253-61 [PMID: 26089322]
  40. Sports Med. 2014 Feb;44(2):269-79 [PMID: 24129784]
  41. J Sports Sci Med. 2010 Sep 01;9(3):452-8 [PMID: 24149640]
  42. Sports Med. 2019 Jan;49(1):41-55 [PMID: 30390202]
  43. Br J Sports Med. 2019 Apr;53(8):478-486 [PMID: 29084727]
  44. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 30;16(9): [PMID: 31052205]
  45. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2021 Jul;61(7):877-884 [PMID: 33314880]
  46. J Am Coll Health. 2021 Jul 14;:1-9 [PMID: 34260332]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0studentscollegecompositionLICT-BFRCRFexerciseprogramsbodyMICTHIIT< 0fattrainingcontrol05groupmasscardiorespiratoryfitnesseffectsthreecontinuousn = 13n = 12interventionBodygroupscomparingmuscle = 0canOBJECTIVE:showingdownwardtrendstudyaimedexploreindicatorsMETHODS:total50non-smokinghealthyphysicallyinactiverecruitedcampusBeijingChinarandomlyassigned4groups:low-intensitybloodflowrestrictionmoderate-intensityhigh-intensityintervalcontinued8weeksaerobiccapacitymeasuredRESULTS:ExercisereachedsignificantimprovementsmaximaloxygenuptakeVOmax01decreasepercentagevisceralareareducedsignificantlygrowthChangestrivial842247CONCLUSION:improveprofoundbeneficialimprovementoverallperspectiveidealchoicehoweverduelimitedequipmentchooseaccordingsituationsEffectsdifferentCollege

Similar Articles

Cited By