OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
PeerJ
2022;9 e12558.

Genome-wide identification and expression profile of YABBY genes in .

Chengru Li, Na Dong, Liming Shen, Meng Lu, Junwen Zhai, Yamei Zhao, Lei Chen, Zhiting Wan, Zhongjian Liu, Hui Ren, Shasha Wu
Author Information
  1. Chengru Li: College of Landscape Architecture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China. ORCID
  2. Na Dong: College of Landscape Architecture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
  3. Liming Shen: College of Landscape Architecture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
  4. Meng Lu: College of Landscape Architecture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
  5. Junwen Zhai: College of Landscape Architecture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
  6. Yamei Zhao: College of Landscape Architecture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
  7. Lei Chen: College of Landscape Architecture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
  8. Zhiting Wan: College of Landscape Architecture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
  9. Zhongjian Liu: College of Landscape Architecture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
  10. Hui Ren: Horticulture Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
  11. Shasha Wu: College of Landscape Architecture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
PMID: 35036123 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12558

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Members of the plant-specific YABBY gene family are thought to play an important role in the development of leaf, flower, and fruit. The YABBY genes have been characterized and regarded as vital contributors to fruit development in and tomato, in contrast to that in the important tropical economic fruit star fruit (), even though its genome is available.
METHODS: In the present study, a total of eight YABBY family genes (named from to ) were identified from the genome of star fruit, and their phylogenetic relationships, functional domains and motif compositions, physicochemical properties, chromosome locations, gene structures, protomer elements, collinear analysis, selective pressure, and expression profiles were further analyzed.
RESULTS: Eight genes () were clustered into five clades and were distributed on five chromosomes, and all of them had undergone negative selection. Tandem and fragment duplications rather than WGD contributed to YABBY gene number in the star fruit. Expression profiles of from different organs and developmental stages of fleshy fruit indicated that may play a specific role in regulating fruit size. These results emphasize the need for further studies on the functions of in fruit development.

Keywords

Averrhoa carambola Fruit development Genome-wide analysis RT-qPCR YABBY gene family

References

  1. Nature. 2004 Mar 4;428(6978):84-8 [PMID: 14999285]
  2. BMC Plant Biol. 2004 Jun 01;4:10 [PMID: 15171794]
  3. Theory Biosci. 2005 Nov;124(2):199-212 [PMID: 17046356]
  4. Development. 2004 Sep;131(18):4533-44 [PMID: 15342478]
  5. Genome Biol. 2019 Dec 16;20(1):278 [PMID: 31842956]
  6. Front Genet. 2018 Feb 07;9:33 [PMID: 29467795]
  7. Development. 2004 Aug;131(15):3661-70 [PMID: 15229175]
  8. Dev Genes Evol. 2007 Sep;217(9):629-37 [PMID: 17676337]
  9. Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Jun 1;35(6):1547-1549 [PMID: 29722887]
  10. Science. 2008 Mar 14;319(5869):1527-30 [PMID: 18339939]
  11. BMC Genomics. 2020 Sep 18;21(1):643 [PMID: 32948145]
  12. Cells. 2021 May 08;10(5): [PMID: 34066675]
  13. Genes Dev. 1999 Dec 1;13(23):3160-9 [PMID: 10601041]
  14. Development. 2015 Oct 1;142(19):3343-50 [PMID: 26293302]
  15. Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jun 07;12:663943 [PMID: 34163503]
  16. Plant J. 2009 Oct;60(1):181-93 [PMID: 19508380]
  17. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Apr;40(7):e49 [PMID: 22217600]
  18. Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2012 Jan;14(1):11-23 [PMID: 21974722]
  19. Biol Direct. 2009 Jun 16;4:20 [PMID: 19531225]
  20. BMC Genomics. 2011 Nov 02;12:540 [PMID: 22047402]
  21. Plant Cell. 2004 Feb;16(2):500-9 [PMID: 14729915]
  22. Bioinformatics. 2015 Apr 15;31(8):1296-7 [PMID: 25504850]
  23. Genes Dev. 1999 May 1;13(9):1079-88 [PMID: 10323860]
  24. BMC Genomics. 2006 Dec 08;7:311 [PMID: 17156453]
  25. Plant J. 2011 Jul;67(1):26-36 [PMID: 21435049]
  26. Bioinformatics. 2018 Jul 15;34(14):2490-2492 [PMID: 29506019]
  27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Dec 10;99(25):16128-33 [PMID: 12444254]
  28. BMC Genomics. 2013 Dec 23;14:915 [PMID: 24365221]
  29. Plant Mol Biol. 2004 Sep;56(1):133-43 [PMID: 15604733]
  30. Bioinformatics. 2014 May 1;30(9):1312-3 [PMID: 24451623]
  31. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jun 28;20(13): [PMID: 31261768]
  32. Development. 1999 Sep;126(18):4117-28 [PMID: 10457020]
  33. J Exp Bot. 2009;60(6):1579-88 [PMID: 19246595]
  34. Plant Cell. 2002 Nov;14(11):2761-70 [PMID: 12417699]
  35. Mol Plant. 2020 Aug 3;13(8):1194-1202 [PMID: 32585190]
  36. Development. 2005 Nov;132(22):5021-32 [PMID: 16236772]
  37. Front Plant Sci. 2019 Oct 08;10:1207 [PMID: 31649691]
  38. Science. 2000 Jul 7;289(5476):85-8 [PMID: 10884229]
  39. Hortic Res. 2020 Jun 1;7(1):95 [PMID: 32528707]
  40. Plant Cell. 2018 Mar;30(3):620-637 [PMID: 29514943]
  41. Plant Cell. 1999 Jan;11(1):69-86 [PMID: 9878633]
  42. Genes (Basel). 2020 Aug 19;11(9): [PMID: 32825004]
  43. Mol Genet Genomics. 2013 Apr;288(3-4):111-29 [PMID: 23371549]
  44. Plant Cell. 2010 Jul;22(7):2113-30 [PMID: 20628155]
  45. Gene. 2020 Aug 20;752:144784 [PMID: 32439372]
  46. Plant Cell. 2005 Jan;17(1):25-36 [PMID: 15598802]
  47. Ecol Evol. 2019 Mar 01;9(7):3891-3898 [PMID: 31015974]
  48. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2015 Oct;27:44-51 [PMID: 26125498]
  49. Plant Physiol. 2011 Nov;157(3):1175-86 [PMID: 21921117]
  50. Evol Dev. 2016 Mar-Apr;18(2):116-26 [PMID: 26763689]
  51. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jul 1;34(Web Server issue):W369-73 [PMID: 16845028]
  52. J Integr Plant Biol. 2013 Jun;55(6):552-66 [PMID: 23462305]
  53. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Mar 22;102(12):4649-54 [PMID: 15767586]
  54. Plant Cell. 2001 May;13(5):1025-33 [PMID: 11340179]
  55. J Exp Bot. 2014 Apr;65(6):1513-28 [PMID: 24510937]
  56. BMC Evol Biol. 2014 Mar 16;14(1):50 [PMID: 24629165]
  57. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009;60:433-53 [PMID: 19575588]
  58. Hortic Res. 2020 Jun 1;7(1):94 [PMID: 32528706]
  59. Plant Cell. 2004 Dec;16(12):3460-79 [PMID: 15548743]
  60. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Dec 23;100(26):15682-7 [PMID: 14671323]
  61. Methods Mol Biol. 1999;112:531-52 [PMID: 10027275]
  62. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2000 Feb;3(1):17-22 [PMID: 10679447]
  63. Nat Genet. 2008 Jun;40(6):800-4 [PMID: 18469814]
  64. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2000;1:41-73 [PMID: 11701624]
  65. Nat Methods. 2015 Apr;12(4):357-60 [PMID: 25751142]
  66. Genes (Basel). 2020 Dec 07;11(12): [PMID: 33297327]
  67. Plants (Basel). 2019 Nov 22;8(12): [PMID: 31766767]
  68. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Jan 1;27(1):297-300 [PMID: 9847208]
  69. Mol Genet Genomics. 2007 May;277(5):457-68 [PMID: 17216490]
  70. Science. 2000 Dec 15;290(5499):2105-10 [PMID: 11118137]
  71. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2018 Jul;79:27-36 [PMID: 29092788]
  72. Plant Cell. 2012 Jan;24(1):80-95 [PMID: 22286138]
  73. Sci Rep. 2014 Aug 29;4:6194 [PMID: 25168962]
  74. New Phytol. 2017 Jul;215(2):825-839 [PMID: 28556940]
  75. Plant Cell. 1989 Jan;1(1):37-52 [PMID: 2535466]
  76. Curr Biol. 2003 Sep 2;13(17):1512-7 [PMID: 12956953]
  77. Plant J. 2009 May;58(4):682-93 [PMID: 19175766]
  78. Curr Biol. 2019 Mar 18;29(6):1038-1046.e4 [PMID: 30827915]
Journal Article

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0fruitYABBYgenedevelopmentgenesfamilystarplayimportantrolegenomeanalysisexpressionprofilesfiveGenome-wideBACKGROUND:Membersplant-specificthoughtleafflowercharacterizedregardedvitalcontributorstomatocontrasttropicaleconomiceventhoughavailableMETHODS:presentstudytotaleightnamedidentifiedphylogeneticrelationshipsfunctionaldomainsmotifcompositionsphysicochemicalpropertieschromosomelocationsstructuresprotomerelementscollinearselectivepressureanalyzedRESULTS:EightclusteredcladesdistributedchromosomesundergonenegativeselectionTandemfragmentduplicationsratherWGDcontributednumberExpressiondifferentorgansdevelopmentalstagesfleshyindicatedmayspecificregulatingsizeresultsemphasizeneedstudiesfunctionsidentificationprofileAverrhoacarambolaFruitRT-qPCR

Similar Articles

Cited By