An intentional cohesion call in male chimpanzees of Budongo Forest.

Alice Bouchard, Klaus Zuberbühler
Author Information
  1. Alice Bouchard: Institute of Biology, University of Neuchatel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland. alicebouchard6@gmail.com. ORCID
  2. Klaus Zuberbühler: Institute of Biology, University of Neuchatel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

Abstract

Many social animals travel in cohesive groups but some species, including chimpanzees, form flexible fission-fusion systems where individuals have some control over group cohesion and proximity to others. Here, we explored how male chimpanzees of the Sonso community of Budongo Forest, Uganda, use communication signals during resting, a context where the likelihood of group fission is high due to forthcoming travel. We focused on a context-specific vocalisation, the 'rest hoo', to investigate its function and determine whether it is produced intentionally. We found that this call was typically given towards the end of typical silent resting bouts, i.e., the period when individuals need to decide whether to continue travelling after a brief stop-over or to start a prolonged resting bout. Subjects rested longer after producing 'rest hoos' and their resting time increased with the number of calls produced. They also rested longer if their calls were answered. Furthermore, focal subjects' resting time was prolonged after hearing others' 'rest hoos'. Subjects called more when with top proximity partners and in small parties and rested longer if a top proximity partner called. We also found an interaction effect between rank and grooming activity, with high-ranking males with a high grooming index calling less frequently than other males, suggesting that vocal communication may serve as a cohesion strategy alternative to tactile-based bonding. We discuss these different patterns and conclude that chimpanzee 'rest hoos' meet key criteria for intentional signalling. We suggest that 'rest hoos' are produced to prolong resting bouts with desired partners, which may function to increase social cohesion.

Keywords

References

  1. Evol Psychol. 2013 Jul 18;11(3):538-49 [PMID: 23864293]
  2. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jan 6;375(1789):20180403 [PMID: 31735155]
  3. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2009 Jun;139(2):172-81 [PMID: 19012327]
  4. Nature. 2005 Feb 3;433(7025):513-6 [PMID: 15690039]
  5. Anim Behav. 2007 Feb;73(2):281-286 [PMID: 17389908]
  6. Nature. 2014 Sep 18;513(7518):414-7 [PMID: 25230664]
  7. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Aug;92(3):1427-1433 [PMID: 27480784]
  8. Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Oct 10;285(1888): [PMID: 30305438]
  9. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Mar 27;364(1518):719-42 [PMID: 19073475]
  10. Evol Anthropol. 2013 Sep-Oct;22(5):213-25 [PMID: 24166922]
  11. Dev Psychol. 1998 Sep;34(5):813-22 [PMID: 9779730]
  12. R Soc Open Sci. 2018 May 23;5(5):172066 [PMID: 29892396]
  13. Biol Lett. 2005 Dec 22;1(4):381-5 [PMID: 17148212]
  14. Anim Cogn. 2012 May;15(3):327-39 [PMID: 21947942]
  15. Behav Processes. 2010 Jul;84(3):635-47 [PMID: 20435103]
  16. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 May 19;373(1746): [PMID: 29581391]
  17. Am J Primatol. 2013 Jul;75(7):726-39 [PMID: 23307442]
  18. Curr Biol. 2007 Aug 7;17(15):R586-7 [PMID: 17686425]
  19. PLoS One. 2007 Apr 04;2(4):e348 [PMID: 17406672]
  20. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Nov;7(11):494-7 [PMID: 14585446]
  21. Child Dev. 2005 Jan-Feb;76(1):291-306 [PMID: 15693773]
  22. Biol Lett. 2015 Oct;11(10): [PMID: 26510675]
  23. Am J Primatol. 2015 Feb;77(2):125-34 [PMID: 25256306]
  24. Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 22;12(1):539 [PMID: 33483482]
  25. PLoS One. 2017 Jun 21;12(6):e0178065 [PMID: 28636646]
  26. Am J Primatol. 2011 Dec;73(12):1231-8 [PMID: 21905060]
  27. Anim Cogn. 2018 Sep;21(5):619-629 [PMID: 29876698]
  28. PLoS One. 2013 Sep 25;8(9):e76073 [PMID: 24086688]
  29. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 16;8(10):e76674 [PMID: 24146908]
  30. Anim Cogn. 2015 May;18(3):581-91 [PMID: 25537683]
  31. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2015 Jun 1;69(6):1039-1052 [PMID: 26279605]
  32. Folia Primatol (Basel). 2020;91(6):575-594 [PMID: 32756063]
  33. iScience. 2021 Aug 17;24(8):102864 [PMID: 34471859]
  34. Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Nov 16;283(1842): [PMID: 28120796]

Grants

  1. 310030_185324/Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  2. 51NF40_180888/Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung

MeSH Term

Animals
Forests
Grooming
Humans
Male
Pan troglodytes
Probability
Social Behavior
Uganda

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0restingcohesion'resthoos'chimpanzeesproximityproducedrestedlongersocialtravelindividualsgroupmaleBudongoForestcommunicationhighfunctionwhetherfoundcallboutsprolongedSubjectstimecallsalsocalledtoppartnersgroomingmalesmayintentionalManyanimalscohesivegroupsspeciesincludingformflexiblefission-fusionsystemscontrolothersexploredSonsocommunityUgandausesignalscontextlikelihoodfissiondueforthcomingfocusedcontext-specificvocalisationhoo'investigatedetermineintentionallytypicallygiventowardsendtypicalsilentieperiodneeddecidecontinuetravellingbriefstop-overstartboutproducingincreasednumberansweredFurthermorefocalsubjects'hearingothers'smallpartiespartnerinteractioneffectrankactivityhigh-rankingindexcallinglessfrequentlysuggestingvocalservestrategyalternativetactile-basedbondingdiscussdifferentpatternsconcludechimpanzeemeetkeycriteriasignallingsuggestprolongdesiredincreaseGroupIntentionalityPantroglodytesSocialcognitionVocalisation

Similar Articles

Cited By