Interventions to Improve Safer Sleep Practices in Families With Children Considered to Be at Increased Risk for Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy: A Systematic Review.

Catherine Ellis, Anna Pease, Joanna Garstang, Debbie Watson, Peter S Blair, Peter J Fleming
Author Information
  1. Catherine Ellis: Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
  2. Anna Pease: Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
  3. Joanna Garstang: Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
  4. Debbie Watson: Children and Families Research Centre, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
  5. Peter S Blair: Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
  6. Peter J Fleming: Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Advice to families to follow infant care practices known to reduce the risks of Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy (SUDI) has led to a reduction in deaths across the world. This reduction has slowed in the last decade with most deaths now occurring in families experiencing social and economic deprivation. A systematic review of the literature was commissioned by the National Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel in England. The review covered three areas: interventions to improve engagement with support services, parental decision-making for the infant sleep environment, and interventions to improve safer sleep practices in families with infants considered to be at risk of SUDI. To describe the safer sleep interventions tested with families with infants at risk of SUDI and investigate what this literature can tell us about what works to reduce risk and embed safer sleep practices in this group. Eight online databases were systematically searched in December 2019. Intervention studies that targeted families with infants (0-1 year) at increased risk of SUDI were included. Studies were limited to those from Western Europe, North America or Australasia, published in the last 15 years. The Quality Assessment Tool for Studies with Diverse Designs was applied to assess quality. Data from included studies were extracted for narrative synthesis, including mode of delivery using Michie et al.'s Mode of Delivery Taxonomy. The wider review returned 3,367 papers, with 23 intervention papers. Five types of intervention were identified: (1) infant sleep space and safer sleep education programs, (2) intensive or targeted home visiting services, (3) peer educators/ambassadors, (4) health education/raising awareness interventions, (5) targeted health education messages using digital media. Influencing behavior in families with infants at risk of SUDI has traditionally focused on "getting messages across," with interventions predominantly using education and awareness raising mechanisms. This review found evidence of interventions moving from "information giving" to "information exchange" models using personalized, longer term relationship-building models. This shift may represent an improvement in how safer sleep advice is implemented in families with infants at risk, but more robust evidence of effectiveness is required. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/901091/DfE_Death_in_infancy_review.pdf, identifier: CRD42020165302.

Keywords

References

  1. Health Promot Pract. 2013 May;14(3):408-14 [PMID: 22991310]
  2. J Community Health. 2016 Feb;41(1):180-96 [PMID: 26143241]
  3. Lancet. 2006 Jan 28;367(9507):314-9 [PMID: 16443038]
  4. BMC Pediatr. 2020 Apr 11;20(1):154 [PMID: 32278356]
  5. J Community Health. 2015 Jun;40(3):457-63 [PMID: 25331608]
  6. J Natl Med Assoc. 2010 Oct;102(10):881-9 [PMID: 21053702]
  7. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2015 Jun;21(6):294-301 [PMID: 26126678]
  8. Pediatrics. 2004 Jul;114(1):234-8 [PMID: 15231934]
  9. Child Abuse Negl. 2011 Apr;35(4):299-306 [PMID: 21481462]
  10. Matern Child Health J. 2007 Jul;11(4):365-71 [PMID: 17295068]
  11. Acad Pediatr. 2017 Nov - Dec;17(8):879-886 [PMID: 28450082]
  12. Arch Dis Child. 2019 Jan;104(1):30-36 [PMID: 29802134]
  13. J Pediatr. 2016 Aug;175:79-85.e2 [PMID: 27263400]
  14. Child Care Health Dev. 2021 Sep;47(5):713-731 [PMID: 33929753]
  15. J Community Health. 2018 Oct;43(5):977-985 [PMID: 29637434]
  16. Pediatrics. 2014 Nov;134(5):e1293-300 [PMID: 25311597]
  17. Health Educ Monogr. 1978 Winter;6(4):394-405 [PMID: 299611]
  18. J Community Health. 2019 Feb;44(1):185-191 [PMID: 30187364]
  19. J Pediatr. 2016 Jul;174:78-83.e2 [PMID: 27113377]
  20. Matern Child Health J. 2015 Mar;19(3):496-503 [PMID: 24889117]
  21. Kans J Med. 2017 Aug 30;10(3):1-8 [PMID: 29472971]
  22. J Adv Nurs. 2013 Aug;69(8):1850-61 [PMID: 23194385]
  23. Acad Pediatr. 2009 Jan-Feb;9(1):26-32 [PMID: 19329088]
  24. Health Soc Work. 2007 Aug;32(3):225-9 [PMID: 17896680]
  25. J Paediatr Child Health. 2018 Apr;54(4):377-382 [PMID: 29125216]
  26. J Community Health. 2018 Oct;43(5):848-855 [PMID: 29497933]
  27. Pediatrics. 2017 Feb;139(2): [PMID: 28044049]
  28. J Community Health. 2017 Feb;42(1):1-9 [PMID: 27470122]
  29. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(1):e000983 [PMID: 33754131]
  30. J Adolesc Health. 2005 Oct;37(4):339-41 [PMID: 16200674]
  31. JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Sep;168(9):800-6 [PMID: 25003802]
  32. Health Stat Q. 2009 Autumn;(43):63-7 [PMID: 19774836]
  33. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2017 Sep 04;1(1):e000133 [PMID: 29637151]
  34. Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42 [PMID: 21513547]
  35. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Aug;18(4):746-52 [PMID: 21410846]
  36. BMJ. 2009 Oct 13;339:b3666 [PMID: 19826174]
  37. Health Educ Q. 1984 Spring;11(1):1-47 [PMID: 6392204]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0sleepfamiliesinterventionsinfantsriskinfantSUDIreviewsaferusingpracticestargetededucationreduceSuddenUnexpectedDeathreductiondeathsacrosslastsystematicliteratureReviewimproveservicesstudiesincludedStudies3papersinterventionhealthawarenessmessagesevidence"informationmodelssuddendeathAdvicefollowcareknownrisksInfancyledworldsloweddecadenowoccurringexperiencingsocialeconomicdeprivationcommissionedNationalChildSafeguardingPracticePanelEnglandcoveredthreeareas:engagementsupportparentaldecision-makingenvironmentconsidereddescribetestedinvestigatecantellusworksembedgroupEightonlinedatabasessystematicallysearchedDecember2019Intervention0-1yearincreasedlimitedWesternEuropeNorthAmericaAustralasiapublished15yearsQualityAssessmentToolDiverseDesignsappliedassessqualityDataextractednarrativesynthesisincludingmodedeliveryMichieetal'sModeDeliveryTaxonomywiderreturned36723Fivetypesidentified:1spaceprograms2intensivehomevisitingpeereducators/ambassadors4education/raising5digitalmediaInfluencingbehaviortraditionallyfocused"getting"predominantlyraisingmechanismsfoundmovinggiving"exchange"personalizedlongertermrelationship-buildingshiftmayrepresentimprovementadviceimplementedrobusteffectivenessrequiredhttps://assetspublishingservicegovuk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/901091/DfE_Death_in_infancy_reviewpdfidentifier:CRD42020165302InterventionsImproveSaferSleepPracticesFamiliesChildrenConsideredIncreasedRiskInfancy:Systematicsafesyndromeunexpected

Similar Articles

Cited By