Digital Tools in Behavior Change Support Education in Health and Other Students: A Systematic Review.

Lucija Gosak, Gregor Štiglic, Leona Cilar Budler, Isa Brito Félix, Katja Braam, Nino Fijačko, Mara Pereira Guerreiro, Mateja Lorber
Author Information
  1. Lucija Gosak: Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia. ORCID
  2. Gregor Štiglic: Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia. ORCID
  3. Leona Cilar Budler: Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia. ORCID
  4. Isa Brito Félix: Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon, Nursing School of Lisbon, 1600-190 Lisbon, Portugal.
  5. Katja Braam: Faculty of Healthcare, Sports and Welfare, Inholland University of Applied Sciences, 3521 Haarlem, The Netherlands.
  6. Nino Fijačko: Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia. ORCID
  7. Mara Pereira Guerreiro: Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon, Nursing School of Lisbon, 1600-190 Lisbon, Portugal.
  8. Mateja Lorber: Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia. ORCID

Abstract

Due to the increased prevalence of chronic diseases, behavior changes are integral to self-management. Healthcare and other professionals are expected to support these behavior changes, and therefore, undergraduate students should receive up-to-date and evidence-based training in this respect. Our work aims to review the outcomes of digital tools in behavior change support education. A secondary aim was to examine existing instruments to assess the effectiveness of these tools. A PIO (population/problem, intervention, outcome) research question led our literature search. The population was limited to students in nursing, sports sciences, and pharmacy; the interventions were limited to digital teaching tools; and the outcomes consisted of knowledge, motivation, and competencies. A systematic literature review was performed in the PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, SAGE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases and by backward citation searching. We used PRISMA guidelines 2020 to depict the search process for relevant literature. Two authors evaluated included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) independently. Using inclusion and exclusion criteria, we included 15 studies in the final analysis: six quantitative descriptive studies, two randomized studies, six mixed methods studies, and one qualitative study. According to the MMAT, all studies were suitable for further analysis in terms of quality. The studies resorted to various digital tools to improve students' knowledge of behavior change techniques in individuals with chronic disease, leading to greater self-confidence, better cooperation, and practical experience and skills. The most common limitations that have been perceived for using these tools are time and space constraints.

Keywords

References

  1. Eur Psychol. 2019;24(1):7-25 [PMID: 31496632]
  2. J R Soc Med. 2003 Mar;96(3):118-21 [PMID: 12612111]
  3. Diabetes Care. 1998 Sep;21(9):1403-7 [PMID: 9727884]
  4. Am J Public Health. 2004 Mar;94(3):368-71 [PMID: 14998796]
  5. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Sep 30;13(10): [PMID: 27706061]
  6. Med Teach. 2003 Nov;25(6):569-84 [PMID: 15369904]
  7. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 27;22(4):e13851 [PMID: 32338618]
  8. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2016 Nov;10(6):429-436 [PMID: 28239308]
  9. Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Jul;35(7):875-80 [PMID: 25735908]
  10. Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 Nov 25;79(9):133 [PMID: 26839423]
  11. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Feb;97:104705 [PMID: 33341525]
  12. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 21;1:CD011736 [PMID: 29355907]
  13. Afr J Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):93-99 [PMID: 30456117]
  14. Mol Biol Cell. 2015 Jun 15;26(12):2151-5 [PMID: 26067566]
  15. Nurse Educ. 2018 Mar/Apr;43(2):78-82 [PMID: 28817476]
  16. Br J Nurs. 2019 Nov 14;28(20):1300-1306 [PMID: 31714829]
  17. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097 [PMID: 19621072]
  18. Pak J Med Sci. 2017 Mar-Apr;33(2):505-509 [PMID: 28523066]
  19. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Mar 07;8(3):e12087 [PMID: 30843868]
  20. Med Educ. 1999 Feb;33(2):95-100 [PMID: 10211258]
  21. Nurs Res Pract. 2012;2012:765212 [PMID: 22550573]
  22. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Sep;32(9):1031-1043 [PMID: 28600753]
  23. J Prof Nurs. 2019 Sep - Oct;35(5):417-424 [PMID: 31519347]
  24. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Nov-Dec;20(6):64-78 [PMID: 11816692]
  25. Acta Inform Med. 2008;16(2):102-17 [PMID: 24109154]
  26. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2012 Jul;17(5):330-7 [PMID: 23853644]
  27. Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jun 09;20(11): [PMID: 32526998]
  28. Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Jun 17;78(5):94 [PMID: 24954934]
  29. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2012 Sep;56(3):167-71 [PMID: 22997465]
  30. BMC Nurs. 2015 May 14;14:32 [PMID: 26085815]
  31. Med Educ Online. 2016 Feb 26;21:31272 [PMID: 26925763]
  32. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017 Jan 13;8:63-73 [PMID: 28144171]
  33. Hu Li Za Zhi. 2015 Jun;62(3):5-10 [PMID: 26073950]
  34. Comput Inform Nurs. 2018 Feb;36(2):70-76 [PMID: 29084028]
  35. J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Jan;105(1):44-48 [PMID: 28096745]
  36. J Med Invest. 2019;66(1.2):38-41 [PMID: 31064951]
  37. PLoS Med. 2021 Mar 29;18(3):e1003583 [PMID: 33780438]
  38. J Educ Health Promot. 2019 Sep 30;8:178 [PMID: 31867363]
  39. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2018 May-Jun;23(3):217-221 [PMID: 29861761]
  40. Iran J Public Health. 2018 Sep;47(9):1432-1433 [PMID: 30320022]
  41. Can Vet J. 2013 Aug;54(8):721-4 [PMID: 24155470]
  42. BMC Med Educ. 2017 May 31;17(1):97 [PMID: 28566091]
  43. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Sep 10;74(7):130 [PMID: 21088736]
  44. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Sep 17;10(9):e26680 [PMID: 34533460]
  45. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019 Nov;11(11):1144-1151 [PMID: 31783961]
  46. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Sep;104:104984 [PMID: 34058646]
  47. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 25;18(1):583 [PMID: 30045721]
  48. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Nov 10;74(9):169 [PMID: 21301603]
  49. Am J Public Health. 2015 Mar;105 Suppl 1:S44-5 [PMID: 25706016]
  50. J Educ Health Promot. 2019 May 14;8:103 [PMID: 31143820]
  51. Soc Sci Med. 2019 Feb;222:225-230 [PMID: 30665062]
  52. Med Teach. 2007 May;29(4):391-3 [PMID: 17786757]
  53. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Oct 20;12(10):e1005061 [PMID: 27764089]
  54. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2015;126:260-70 [PMID: 26330687]
  55. Contemp Nurse. 2017 Feb;53(1):60-74 [PMID: 28084900]
  56. Health Rep. 2012 Dec;23(4):49-53 [PMID: 23356045]
  57. Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Nov;97(2):147-57 [PMID: 25127667]
  58. Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 Aug;39:1-10 [PMID: 31326712]
  59. Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Aug;81(6):113 [PMID: 28970614]
  60. Nurs Outlook. 2015 Mar-Apr;63(2):154-61 [PMID: 25241136]

Grants

  1. N2-0101/Slovenian Research Agency
  2. P2-0057/Slovenian Research Agency
  3. 2019-1-PT01-KA203-061389/Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0studiestoolsbehaviordigitalchronicdiseasessupportchangeliteraturechangesstudentsreviewoutcomeseducationsearchlimitedknowledgeincludedusingMMATsixDueincreasedprevalenceintegralself-managementHealthcareprofessionalsexpectedthereforeundergraduatereceiveup-to-dateevidence-basedtrainingrespectworkaimssecondaryaimexamineexistinginstrumentsassesseffectivenessPIOpopulation/probleminterventionoutcomeresearchquestionledpopulationnursingsportssciencespharmacyinterventionsteachingconsistedmotivationcompetenciessystematicperformedPubMedCINAHLMEDLINEWebScienceSAGEScopusCochraneLibrarydatabasesbackwardcitationsearchingusedPRISMAguidelines2020depictprocessrelevantTwoauthorsevaluatedMixedMethodsAppraisalToolindependentlyUsinginclusionexclusioncriteria15finalanalysis:quantitativedescriptivetworandomizedmixedmethodsonequalitativestudyAccordingsuitableanalysistermsqualityresortedvariousimprovestudents'techniquesindividualsdiseaseleadinggreaterself-confidencebettercooperationpracticalexperienceskillscommonlimitationsperceivedtimespaceconstraintsDigitalToolsBehaviorChangeSupportEducationHealthStudents:SystematicReviewdidacticshealthsciencenoncommunicable

Similar Articles

Cited By