After 100 Years of BCG Immunization against Tuberculosis, What Is New and Still Outstanding for This Vaccine?

Mario Alberto Flores-Valdez
Author Information
  1. Mario Alberto Flores-Valdez: Biotecnología Médica y Farmacéutica, Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco, A.C., Av. Normalistas 800, Col. Colinas de la Normal, Guadalajara 44270, Jalisco, Mexico. ORCID

Abstract

In 2021, most of the world was reasonably still concerned about the COVID-19 pandemic, how cases were up and down in different countries, how the vaccination campaigns were ongoing, and most people were familiar with the speed with which vaccines against SARS-Co-V2 were developed, analyzed, and started to be applied in an attempt to curb the pandemic. Because of this, it may have somehow passed relatively inadvertently for people outside of the field that the vaccine used to control tuberculosis (TB), Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG), was first applied to humans a century ago. Over these years, BCG has been the vaccine applied to most human beings in the world, despite its known lack of efficacy to fully prevent respiratory TB. Several strategies have been employed in the last 20 years to produce a novel vaccine that would replace, or boost, immunity and protection elicited by BCG. In this work, to avoid potential redundancies with recently published reviews, I only aim to present my current thoughts about some of the latest findings and outstanding questions that I consider worth investigating to help develop a replacement or modified BCG in order to successfully fight TB, based on BCG itself.

Keywords

References

  1. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Aug 25;9(9): [PMID: 34579182]
  2. Vaccine. 2015 Mar 10;33(11):1353-9 [PMID: 25657094]
  3. Vaccine. 2013 Feb 18;31(9):1340-8 [PMID: 23290835]
  4. Sci Transl Med. 2020 Oct 7;12(564): [PMID: 33028708]
  5. Pharmaceutics. 2020 Apr 25;12(5): [PMID: 32344890]
  6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Sep 20;113(38):E5636-44 [PMID: 27601645]
  7. Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Feb;7(2):e209-e218 [PMID: 30630775]
  8. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2017 Feb 6;24(2): [PMID: 27974398]
  9. J Infect Dis. 2016 Mar 1;213(5):831-9 [PMID: 26494773]
  10. Mol Ther. 2018 Dec 5;26(12):2863-2874 [PMID: 30274790]
  11. Mol Microbiol. 2002 Nov;46(3):709-17 [PMID: 12410828]
  12. Semin Immunol. 2018 Oct;39:44-51 [PMID: 30033150]
  13. Vaccine. 2018 Jun 7;36(24):3408-3410 [PMID: 29609965]
  14. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Nov 12;:1-7 [PMID: 34766868]
  15. mBio. 2016 May 24;7(3): [PMID: 27222470]
  16. Nat Commun. 2018 Dec 6;9(1):5208 [PMID: 30523338]
  17. Vaccine. 2018 Jan 25;36(4):498-506 [PMID: 29254839]
  18. Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 14;11(1):12417 [PMID: 34127755]
  19. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2015 Sep;22(9):992-1003 [PMID: 26108288]
  20. Vaccine. 2021 Dec 8;39(50):7332-7340 [PMID: 34627626]
  21. Nat Med. 2003 May;9(5):533-9 [PMID: 12692540]
  22. Thorax. 2021 Nov;76(11):1131-1141 [PMID: 33893231]
  23. Cell Rep. 2017 Mar 14;18(11):2752-2765 [PMID: 28297677]
  24. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2001;81(3):229-42 [PMID: 11466035]
  25. Front Microbiol. 2021 Oct 06;12:750124 [PMID: 34691001]
  26. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Jan;22(1):e2-e12 [PMID: 34506734]
  27. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1313:217-240 [PMID: 34661897]
  28. Microbes Infect. 2016 May;18(5):364-8 [PMID: 26994939]
  29. PLoS Med. 2019 Apr 16;16(4):e1002781 [PMID: 30990820]
  30. Tuber Lung Dis. 1993 Feb;74(1):38-46 [PMID: 8495019]
  31. Front Microbiol. 2018 Jun 12;9:1281 [PMID: 29946316]
  32. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 25;117(34):20848-20859 [PMID: 32778586]
  33. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Jul 15;204(2):142-148 [PMID: 33761302]
  34. Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Jan 27;288(1943):20201635 [PMID: 33467995]
  35. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2016 Dec;101:174-190 [PMID: 27865390]
  36. Nature. 2020 Jan;577(7788):95-102 [PMID: 31894150]
  37. Nat Commun. 2015 Oct 13;6:8533 [PMID: 26460802]
  38. Vaccine. 2020 Feb 24;38(9):2229-2240 [PMID: 32005538]
  39. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2021 Apr 7;:1-13 [PMID: 33842192]
  40. J Clin Invest. 2021 Jun 1;131(11): [PMID: 34060492]
  41. Cell Host Microbe. 2021 Feb 10;29(2):165-178.e8 [PMID: 33340449]
  42. Infect Immun. 2003 Apr;71(4):1672-9 [PMID: 12654780]
  43. J Infect Dis. 2008 Nov 15;198(10):1491-501 [PMID: 18808333]
  44. Vaccine. 2016 Sep 14;34(40):4763-70 [PMID: 27546876]
  45. Sci Rep. 2020 May 25;10(1):8629 [PMID: 32451443]
  46. Nat Immunol. 2021 Dec;22(12):1515-1523 [PMID: 34811542]
  47. Immunol Rev. 2021 May;301(1):98-121 [PMID: 33955564]
  48. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 12;379(2):138-149 [PMID: 29996082]
  49. Nat Med. 2019 Feb;25(2):255-262 [PMID: 30664782]
  50. Pharmaceutics. 2020 Sep 22;12(9): [PMID: 32971826]
  51. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2018 Sep 1;22(9):1108-1109 [PMID: 30092882]
  52. J Infect Dis. 2018 May 25;217(12):1865-1874 [PMID: 29432596]
  53. Commun Biol. 2020 Oct 9;3(1):563 [PMID: 33037320]
  54. Vaccine. 2021 Dec 8;39(50):7265-7276 [PMID: 34420788]
  55. Front Microbiol. 2021 Oct 21;12:757858 [PMID: 34745066]
  56. Front Immunol. 2019 Mar 22;10:527 [PMID: 30967866]
  57. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 25;98(20):11497-502 [PMID: 11562492]
  58. PLoS Pathog. 2020 Jul 30;16(7):e1008413 [PMID: 32730321]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0BCGappliedvaccineTBworldpandemicpeopletuberculosisyears2021reasonablystillconcernedCOVID-19casesdifferentcountriesvaccinationcampaignsongoingfamiliarspeedvaccinesSARS-Co-V2developedanalyzedstartedattemptcurbmaysomehowpassedrelativelyinadvertentlyoutsidefieldusedcontrolBacilleCalmette-GuérinfirsthumanscenturyagohumanbeingsdespiteknownlackefficacyfullypreventrespiratorySeveralstrategiesemployedlast20producenovelreplaceboostimmunityprotectionelicitedworkavoidpotentialredundanciesrecentlypublishedreviewsaimpresentcurrentthoughtslatestfindingsoutstandingquestionsconsiderworthinvestigatinghelpdevelopreplacementmodifiedordersuccessfullyfightbaseditself100YearsImmunizationTuberculosisNewStillOutstandingVaccine?BCGBCGΔBCG1419cVPM1022rBCG

Similar Articles

Cited By