Food insecurity among Finnish private service sector workers: validity, prevalence and determinants.

Hanna M Walsh, Jaakko Nevalainen, Tiina Saari, Liisa Uusitalo, Turkka Näppilä, Ossi Rahkonen, Maijaliisa Erkkola
Author Information
  1. Hanna M Walsh: Department of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, Agnes Sjöbergin Katu 2, Helsinki00014, Finland. ORCID
  2. Jaakko Nevalainen: Health Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Finland. ORCID
  3. Tiina Saari: Work Research Centre, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Finland. ORCID
  4. Liisa Uusitalo: Department of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, Agnes Sjöbergin Katu 2, Helsinki00014, Finland.
  5. Turkka Näppilä: Tampere University Library, Tampere University, Finland. ORCID
  6. Ossi Rahkonen: Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Finland. ORCID
  7. Maijaliisa Erkkola: Department of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, Agnes Sjöbergin Katu 2, Helsinki00014, Finland. ORCID

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence and determinants of food insecurity among private sector service workers in Finland and assess validity of the Household food insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) tool.
DESIGN: In this cross-sectional study, food insecurity and background characteristics were collected from Finnish private service workers via electronic questionnaires (2019) and national register data (2018-2019). We conducted univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to determine the variables explaining food insecurity. Validity of HFIAS was assessed with rotated principal component analysis and Cronbach's α.
SETTING: Members of the trade union for private sector service workers, Service Union United (PAM), from all municipalities in Finland participated in the study in 2019.
PARTICIPANTS: The subjects were 6435 private sector workers that were members of the Service Union United (PAM) in Finland. Mean age of participants was 44 years (sd 12·7 years).
RESULTS: Two-thirds of the participants (65 %) were food insecure with over a third (36 %) reporting severe food insecurity. Reporting great difficulties in covering household expenses and young age markedly increased the risk of severe food insecurity (OR 15·05; 95 % CI 10·60, 21·38 and OR 5·07; 95 % CI 3·94, 6·52, respectively). Not being married, low education, working in the hospitality industry, being male and living in rented housing also increased the probability of severe food insecurity. The HFIAS tool demonstrated acceptable construct and criterion validity.
CONCLUSIONS: Severe food insecurity was widespread and associated with low socio-economic status, young age and being male among Finnish private sector service workers, emphasising the need for regular monitoring of food insecurity in Finland.

Keywords

References

  1. Appetite. 2016 Aug 1;103:137-147 [PMID: 27067740]
  2. J Nutr. 1990 Nov;120 Suppl 11(suppl_11):1544-8 [PMID: 2243303]
  3. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 17;15(12): [PMID: 30563031]
  4. Public Health Nutr. 2015 Nov;18(16):2952-61 [PMID: 25563304]
  5. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Jul;73(7):668-673 [PMID: 31036607]
  6. Public Health Nutr. 2020 Jul;23(10):1778-1790 [PMID: 32174292]
  7. BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 3;19(1):12 [PMID: 30606152]
  8. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Apr;55(4):227-32 [PMID: 11238576]
  9. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21(6):409-15 [PMID: 16804763]
  10. Health Promot Pract. 2021 Mar;22(2):204-214 [PMID: 32748673]
  11. J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Mar 1;40(1):32-40 [PMID: 28369526]
  12. J Nutr. 2013 Aug;143(8):1316-23 [PMID: 23761648]
  13. J Nutr. 2001 Nov;131(11):2880-4 [PMID: 11694612]
  14. Public Health Nutr. 2010 Mar;13(3):360-7 [PMID: 19706211]
  15. Lancet. 2015 May 23;385(9982):2041 [PMID: 26009221]
  16. Public Health Nutr. 2015 Feb;18(2):251-8 [PMID: 24702865]
  17. J Nutr. 2006 May;136(5):1438S-1448S [PMID: 16614441]
  18. J Nutr. 2008 Mar;138(3):604-12 [PMID: 18287374]
  19. BMJ Open. 2014 May 16;4(5):e004657 [PMID: 24838723]
  20. CMAJ. 2020 Jan 20;192(3):E53-E60 [PMID: 31959655]
  21. BMC Public Health. 2019 May 17;19(1):592 [PMID: 31101092]
  22. Eur J Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;28(2):283-288 [PMID: 29020375]
  23. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 May;50(5):517-28 [PMID: 9180644]
  24. J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Jul;22(7):1018-23 [PMID: 17436030]
  25. Food Nutr Bull. 2014 Dec;35(4):395-402 [PMID: 25639124]
  26. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 Dec;114(12):1943-53.e2 [PMID: 25091796]
  27. CMAJ. 2015 Oct 6;187(14):E429-E436 [PMID: 26261199]
  28. J Nutr. 2013 Nov;143(11):1785-93 [PMID: 23986364]
  29. J Nutr. 2001 Oct;131(10):2670-6 [PMID: 11584089]
  30. J Nutr. 2010 Feb;140(2):304-10 [PMID: 20032485]
  31. Public Health Nutr. 2012 Jan;15(1):149-57 [PMID: 21806860]

MeSH Term

Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Finland
Food Insecurity
Food Supply
Humans
Male
Prevalence
Private Sector
Socioeconomic Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0foodinsecurityprivatesectorserviceworkersFinland%amongvalidityFoodHFIASFinnishagesevereprevalencedeterminantstoolstudy2019ServiceUnionUnitedPAMparticipantsyearsyoungincreasedOR95CIlowmaleOBJECTIVE:examineassessHouseholdInsecurityAccessScaleDESIGN:cross-sectionalbackgroundcharacteristicscollectedviaelectronicquestionnairesnationalregisterdata2018-2019conductedunivariatemultivariatelogisticregressionanalysesdeterminevariablesexplainingValidityassessedrotatedprincipalcomponentanalysisCronbach'sαSETTING:MemberstradeunionmunicipalitiesparticipatedPARTICIPANTS:subjects6435membersMean44sd12·7RESULTS:Two-thirds65insecurethird36reportingReportinggreatdifficultiescoveringhouseholdexpensesmarkedlyrisk15·0510·6021·385·073·946·52respectivelymarriededucationworkinghospitalityindustrylivingrentedhousingalsoprobabilitydemonstratedacceptableconstructcriterionCONCLUSIONS:Severewidespreadassociatedsocio-economicstatusemphasisingneedregularmonitoringworkers:securityIncomeOccupationalhealthSocio-economicfactorsWorkingpoor

Similar Articles

Cited By (7)