Synergistic anti-cancer effects of silibinin-etoposide combination against human breast carcinoma MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines.

Mahdie Koushki, Azam Khedri, Mohammad Aberomand, Kourosh Akbari Baghbani, Ghorban Mohammadzadeh
Author Information
  1. Mahdie Koushki: Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
  2. Azam Khedri: Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
  3. Mohammad Aberomand: Toxicology Research Center, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
  4. Kourosh Akbari Baghbani: Department of Infection, Immunity, and Inflammation, University of Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
  5. Ghorban Mohammadzadeh: Hyperlipidemia Research Center, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Recently, there is a significant focus on combination chemotherapy for cancer using a cytotoxic drug and a phytochemical compound. We investigated the effect of silibinin on etoposide-induced apoptosis in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma cell lines.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cytotoxic effects of silibinin and etoposide were determined using MTT assay after 24 and 48 hr incubation with these drugs individually and combined. The mRNA expression of Bax and Bcl2, and protein levels of P53, phosphorylated p53 (P-P53), and P21 were determined using real-time PCR and western blot analysis, respectively. The caspase 9 activity was measured using an ELISA kit.
RESULTS: Silibinin and etoposide alone and combined significantly inhibit cell growth in a dose and time-dependent manner in both cell lines. The strongest synergistic effects in terms of MCF-7 cell growth inhibition [combination index (CI) = 0.066] were evident. The silibinin-etoposide combinations cause a much powerful apoptotic death (47% and 40%) compared with each compound individually in MCF-7 and MDA-MB 231 cells, respectively. Additionally, the silibinin-etoposide combinations significantly increased the expression of P53, P-P53, and P21 in MCF-7 cells. Neither silibinin nor etoposide individually increased the level of P53 and P-P53 in MDA-MB-231 cells, but both of them individually and combined increased the level of P21.
CONCLUSION: Since the silibinin-etoposide combination induces apoptosis in both cell lines with and without expression of p53, thus, it is suggested that this combination may be a successful therapeutic strategy for breast cancer regardless of P53 status.

Keywords

References

  1. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2018 Mar 16;3:7 [PMID: 29560283]
  2. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2020;20(15):1787-1796 [PMID: 31858905]
  3. Cancers (Basel). 2018 Dec 28;11(1): [PMID: 30597838]
  4. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019 Jun;114:108800 [PMID: 30921705]
  5. EXCLI J. 2015 Jan 19;14:95-108 [PMID: 26600742]
  6. Cell Cycle. 2019 Dec;18(24):3442-3455 [PMID: 31726940]
  7. Histol Histopathol. 2010 Apr;25(4):485-93 [PMID: 20183801]
  8. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016 Mar 1;98:19-34 [PMID: 26546751]
  9. Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 11;13(10): [PMID: 34064974]
  10. Mol Carcinog. 2006 Jun;45(6):436-42 [PMID: 16637061]
  11. Biochem Pharmacol. 2020 Jul;177:113959 [PMID: 32272110]
  12. Oncogene. 2003 Nov 13;22(51):8271-82 [PMID: 14614451]
  13. Molecules. 2020 Apr 25;25(9): [PMID: 32344919]
  14. Oncotarget. 2017 Jan 31;8(5):8921-8946 [PMID: 27888811]
  15. Oncol Lett. 2017 Dec;14(6):7577-7582 [PMID: 29344204]
  16. Invest New Drugs. 2007 Apr;25(2):139-46 [PMID: 17077998]
  17. Cancer Res. 2015 Dec 1;75(23):5001-7 [PMID: 26573797]
  18. Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 6;8(23):38022-38043 [PMID: 28410237]
  19. Ecancermedicalscience. 2019;13:961 [PMID: 31537986]
  20. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2020 Apr;61(4):445-455 [PMID: 32078183]
  21. Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Feb 02;19(2): [PMID: 29393886]
  22. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2017 Jun;36(6):573-586 [PMID: 27402681]
  23. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 May 02;21(9): [PMID: 32370233]
  24. J Cell Biochem. 2019 Jun;120(6):9125-9137 [PMID: 30614034]
  25. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jun 20;22(12): [PMID: 34202987]
  26. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 28;13(9): [PMID: 33924934]
  27. J Breast Cancer. 2016 Mar;19(1):45-52 [PMID: 27066095]
  28. Cancer Drug Resist. 2019;2:141-160 [PMID: 34322663]
  29. Semin Cancer Biol. 2015 Dec;35 Suppl:S78-S103 [PMID: 25936818]
  30. Molecules. 2018 Apr 04;23(4): [PMID: 29617302]
  31. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018 Jun;102:689-698 [PMID: 29604588]
  32. Pharmacol Rev. 2006 Sep;58(3):621-81 [PMID: 16968952]
  33. Front Pharmacol. 2020 Apr 15;11:445 [PMID: 32351390]
  34. Cell Death Differ. 2018 Jan;25(1):104-113 [PMID: 29149101]
  35. Nutr Cancer. 2021;73(8):1389-1399 [PMID: 32748663]
  36. Front Pharmacol. 2018 Nov 13;9:1307 [PMID: 30483138]
  37. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2019 Apr 10;11:151-164 [PMID: 31040712]
  38. Pharm Biol. 2017 Dec;55(1):729-739 [PMID: 28027688]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MCF-7cellcombinationusinglinesindividuallyP53silibinin-etoposidecellscancersilibininMDA-MB-231breasteffectsetoposidecombinedexpressionP-P53P21increasedcytotoxiccompoundapoptosiscarcinomadeterminedp53respectivelySilibininsignificantlygrowthcombinationslevelOBJECTIVES:Recentlysignificantfocuschemotherapydrugphytochemicalinvestigatedeffectetoposide-inducedMATERIALSANDMETHODS:MTTassay2448hrincubationdrugsmRNABaxBcl2proteinlevelsphosphorylatedreal-timePCRwesternblotanalysiscaspase9activitymeasuredELISAkitRESULTS:aloneinhibitdosetime-dependentmannerstrongestsynergistictermsinhibition[combinationindexCI=0066]evidentcausemuchpowerfulapoptoticdeath47%40%comparedMDA-MB231AdditionallyNeitherCONCLUSION:SinceinduceswithoutthussuggestedmaysuccessfultherapeuticstrategyregardlessstatusSynergisticanti-cancerhumanApoptosisBreastDrugsynergismEtoposide

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)