A tandem duplication in Drosophila melanogaster shows enhanced expression beyond the gene copy number.

David W Loehlin, Jeremiah Y Kim, Caleigh O Paster
Author Information
  1. David W Loehlin: Biology Department, Williams College, Williamstown, MA 01267, USA.
  2. Jeremiah Y Kim: Biology Department, Williams College, Williamstown, MA 01267, USA.
  3. Caleigh O Paster: Biology Department, Williams College, Williamstown, MA 01267, USA.

Abstract

Tandem duplicated genes are common features of genomes, but the phenotypic consequences of their origins are not well understood. It is not known whether a simple doubling of gene expression should be expected, or else some other expression outcome. This study describes an experimental framework using engineered deletions to assess any contribution of locally acting cis- and globally acting trans-regulatory factors to expression interactions of particular tandem duplicated genes. Acsx1L (CG6300) and Acsx1R (CG11659) are tandem duplicates of a putative acyl-CoA synthetase gene found in Drosophila melanogaster. Experimental deletions of the duplicated segments were used to investigate whether the presence of 1 tandem duplicated block influences the expression of its neighbor. Acsx1L, the gene in the left block, shows much higher expression than either its duplicate Acsx1R or the single Acsx1 in Drosophila simulans. Acsx1L expression decreases drastically upon deleting the right-hand duplicated block. Crosses among wildtype and deletion strains show that high tandem expression is primarily due to cis-acting interactions between the duplicated blocks. No effect of these genes on cuticular hydrocarbons was detected. Sequence and phylogenetic analysis suggest that the duplication rose to fixation in D. melanogaster and has been subject to extensive gene conversion. Some strains actually carry 3 tandem copies, yet strains with 3 Acsx1s do not have higher expression levels than strains with 2. Surveys of tandem duplicate expression have typically not found the expected 2-fold increase in expression. This study suggests that cis-regulatory interactions between duplicated blocks could be responsible for this trend.

Keywords

References

  1. Curr Biol. 2018 Apr 2;28(7):1016-1026.e4 [PMID: 29576471]
  2. Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Dec 22;279(1749):5048-57 [PMID: 22977152]
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Sep 11;109(37):14746-53 [PMID: 22908297]
  4. Genetics. 2016 Oct;204(2):435-450 [PMID: 27729494]
  5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 10;115(28):7386-7391 [PMID: 29941601]
  6. Front Genet. 2013 Dec 10;4:273 [PMID: 24368910]
  7. Chromosome Res. 2009;17(5):585-602 [PMID: 19626444]
  8. Structure. 2006 Feb;14(2):197-204 [PMID: 16472739]
  9. Genome Res. 2016 Jun;26(6):787-98 [PMID: 27197209]
  10. Nat Commun. 2019 Oct 25;10(1):4872 [PMID: 31653862]
  11. Cell Rep. 2012 Feb 23;1(2):118-32 [PMID: 22832161]
  12. PLoS One. 2017 Mar 16;12(3):e0173991 [PMID: 28301587]
  13. Genome Res. 2014 May;24(5):797-808 [PMID: 24567308]
  14. Nat Rev Genet. 2016 Apr;17(4):224-38 [PMID: 26924765]
  15. J Biol Chem. 1984 Mar 25;259(6):3748-56 [PMID: 6706976]
  16. Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Feb;11(2):97-108 [PMID: 20051986]
  17. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2009 Jul;8(4):310-6 [PMID: 19641089]
  18. PLoS One. 2011 Mar 15;6(3):e17762 [PMID: 21423626]
  19. Genet Res. 1996 Jun;67(3):211-8 [PMID: 8690269]
  20. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jan 8;49(D1):D899-D907 [PMID: 33219682]
  21. J Lipid Res. 2007 Dec;48(12):2736-50 [PMID: 17762044]
  22. Trends Genet. 2018 Jul;34(7):532-544 [PMID: 29680748]
  23. Mol Biol Evol. 2008 Mar;25(3):591-602 [PMID: 18178968]
  24. Evolution. 2013 May;67(5):1235-50 [PMID: 23617905]
  25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Dec 30;105(52):20870-5 [PMID: 19104045]
  26. Trends Genet. 2015 Sep;31(9):483-90 [PMID: 26259670]
  27. ACS Synth Biol. 2015 Sep 18;4(9):975-86 [PMID: 25871405]
  28. Science. 2012 Oct 19;338(6105):384-7 [PMID: 23087246]
  29. Evolution. 2008 Sep;62(9):2155-77 [PMID: 18616572]
  30. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 24;113(21):5988-92 [PMID: 27162370]
  31. Nat Genet. 2007 Jan;39(1):31-40 [PMID: 17159977]
  32. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jun 18;116(25):12383-12389 [PMID: 31152141]
  33. PLoS Genet. 2016 Jun 22;12(6):e1006126 [PMID: 27333054]
  34. BMC Evol Biol. 2014 Mar 28;14(1):65 [PMID: 24678642]
  35. Genetics. 2014 Apr;196(4):961-71 [PMID: 24478335]
  36. Genetics. 2019 Dec;213(4):1289-1299 [PMID: 31611231]
  37. Blood. 2020 Dec 3;136(23):2679-2690 [PMID: 32663239]
  38. Science. 2016 May 20;352(6288):1009-13 [PMID: 27199432]
  39. PLoS One. 2010 Mar 09;5(3):e9607 [PMID: 20231905]
  40. PLoS Genet. 2017 May 22;13(5):e1006795 [PMID: 28531189]
  41. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Nov 2;46(19):9895-9906 [PMID: 30239812]
  42. Genome Biol Evol. 2017 Sep 1;9(9):2461-2476 [PMID: 28961969]
  43. Trends Genet. 2010 Oct;26(10):425-30 [PMID: 20708291]
  44. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 May 19;117(20):10911-10920 [PMID: 32366667]
  45. Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Dec 1;34(12):3132-3147 [PMID: 28961967]
  46. Trends Genet. 2005 Apr;21(4):219-26 [PMID: 15797617]

Grants

  1. R15 GM140429/NIGMS NIH HHS
  2. R15GM140429/National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health

MeSH Term

Animals
Drosophila melanogaster
Evolution, Molecular
Gene Dosage
Gene Duplication
Genes, Duplicate
Phylogeny

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0expressiontandemduplicatedgenestrainsgenesinteractionsAcsx1LDrosophilamelanogasterblockduplicationwhetherexpectedstudydeletionsactingAcsx1Rfoundshowshigherduplicateblockscuticularhydrocarbons3Tandemcommonfeaturesgenomesphenotypicconsequencesoriginswellunderstoodknownsimpledoublingelseoutcomedescribesexperimentalframeworkusingengineeredassesscontributionlocallycis-globallytrans-regulatoryfactorsparticularCG6300CG11659duplicatesputativeacyl-CoAsynthetaseExperimentalsegmentsusedinvestigatepresence1influencesneighborleftmucheithersingleAcsx1simulansdecreasesdrasticallyupondeletingright-handCrossesamongwildtypedeletionshowhighprimarilyduecis-actingeffectdetectedSequencephylogeneticanalysissuggestrosefixationDsubjectextensiveconversionactuallycarrycopiesyetAcsx1slevels2Surveystypically2-foldincreasesuggestscis-regulatoryresponsibletrendenhancedbeyondcopynumbercopy-numbervariationdosageregulation

Similar Articles

Cited By