BACKGROUND: Intraoperative hand-moulded cranioplasty and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) prostheses made from bone impressions are economical but the cosmetic results are less than satisfactory. Commercially available customized prostheses perform better but are prohibitively expensive. We evaluate the performance of a locally developed, low-cost customized PMMA cranioplasty prosthesis. OBJECTIVE: To compare the cosmetic outcome of 3 types of PMMA cranioplasty as well as with objective measurements on postoperative CT scans METHODS: This study includes 70 patients who underwent cranioplasty between March 2016 and June 2020. In this period, patients had their cranioplasty prostheses made by intra-operative hand moulding (HM), by using the removed bone as a template and making a bone impression (BI) or by 3D printing the prosthesis based on a CT scan. Cosmetic outcomes were assessed by the patient and the operating surgeon on an 8-point scale. The degree of measured anthropometric asymmetry was measured on a postoperative CT scan and correlated with the cosmetic outcome. RESULTS: Our locally produced 3D-printed cranioplasty prostheses showed a statistically better performance in cosmetic scores when compared to the HM and BI (p value < 0.001). CT anthropometric measurements significantly correlated with cosmetic outcome (p value 0.01) CONCLUSION: Our 3D cranioplasty prostheses had better cosmetic outcomes than HM and BI prostheses, and our technique is able to produce them at 10% of the cost of the currently available commercial customized prostheses.
Archana R, Baldia M, Jeeva JB, Joseph M (2019) Strength analysis of cranioplasty PMMA flap material. Mater Today Proc 15:167–172
[DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.04.188]
Arora M, Chan EK, Gupta S, Diwan AD (2013) Polymethylmethacrylate bone cements and additives: a review of the literature. World J Orthop 4(2):67–74
[DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v4.i2.67]
Baldia M, Sharma SA, Prabhu K, Koshy S (2017) Cost effective, technically simpler, and aesthetically promising cranioplasty in developing countries. Neurol India 65(3):660
[DOI: 10.4103/neuroindia.NI_210_16]
Binhammer A, Jakubowski J, Antonyshyn O, Binhammer P (2020) Comparative cost-effectiveness of cranioplasty implants. Plast Surg 28(1):29–39
Caro-Osorio E, De la Garza-Ramos R, Martínez-Sánchez SR, Olazarán-Salinas F (2013) Cranioplasty with polymethylmethacrylate prostheses fabricated by hand using original bone flaps: Technical note and surgical outcomes. Surg Neurol Int 4
Chamo D, Msallem B, Sharma N, Aghlmandi S, Kunz C, Thieringer FM (2020) Accuracy assessment of molded, patient-specific polymethylmethacrylate craniofacial implants compared to their 3D printed originals. J Clin Med 9(3):832
[DOI: 10.3390/jcm9030832]
Cho YJ, Kang SH (2017) Review of cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy. Korean J Neurotrauma 13(1):9–14
[DOI: 10.13004/kjnt.2017.13.1.9]
Desai JB (2019) Cost-effective technique of fabrication of polymethyl methacrylate based cranial implant using three-dimensional printed moulds and wax elimination technique. J Craniofac Surg 30(4):1259–1263
[DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005539]
Đurić KS, Barić H, Domazet I, Barl P, Njirić N, Mrak G (2019) Polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty using low-cost customised 3D printed moulds for cranial defects–a single centre experience. Br J Neurosurg 33(4):376–378
[DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2019.1566514]
Feroze AH, Walmsley GG, Choudhri O, Lorenz HP, Grant GA, Edwards MS (2015) Evolution of cranioplasty techniques in neurosurgery: historical review, pediatric considerations, and current trends. J Neurosurg 123(4):1098–1107
[DOI: 10.3171/2014.11.JNS14622]
Fischer CM, Burkhardt J-K, Sarnthein J, Bernays RL, Bozinov O (2012) Aesthetic outcome in patients after polymethyl-methacrylate (PMMA) cranioplasty—a questionnaire-based single-centre study. Neurol Res 34(3):281–285
[DOI: 10.1179/1743132812Y.0000000007]
Giese H, Meyer J, Engel M, Unterberg A, Beynon C (2020) Polymethylmethacrylate patient-matched implants (PMMA-PMI) for complex and revision cranioplasty: analysis of long-term complication rates and patient outcomes. Brain Inj 34(2):269–275
[DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1683895]
Goh RC, Chang C-N, Lin C-L, Lo L-J (2010) Customised fabricated implants after previous failed cranioplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63(9):1479–1484
[DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.08.010]
Golz T, Graham CR, Busch LC, Wulf J, Winder RJ (2010) Temperature elevation during simulated polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cranioplasty in a cadaver model. J Clin Neurosci 17(5):617–622
[DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2009.09.005]
Hay JA, Smayra T, Moussa R (2017) Customized polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty implants using 3-dimensional printed polylactic acid molds: technical note with 2 illustrative cases. World Neurosurg 105:971–979 (e1)
[DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.007]
Henker C, Hoppmann M-C, Sherman MUS, Glass A, Piek J (2018) Validation of a novel clinical score: the Rostock functional and cosmetic cranioplasty score. J Neurotrauma 35(8):1030–1036
[DOI: 10.1089/neu.2017.5512]
Honeybul S, Morrison DA, Ho KM, Lind CR, Geelhoed E (2017) A randomized controlled trial comparing autologous cranioplasty with custom-made titanium cranioplasty. J Neurosurg 126(1):81–90
[DOI: 10.3171/2015.12.JNS152004]
Hueh LP, Abdullah JY, Abdullah AM, Yahya S, Idris Z, Mohamad D (2016) Patient-specific reconstruction utilizing computer assisted 3D modelling for partial bone flap defect in hybrid cranioplasty. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1791, No. 1, p. 020020). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4968875
Iaccarino C, Kolias A, Adelson PD, Rubiano AM, Viaroli E, Buki A, ... Servadei F (2021) Consensus statement from the international consensus meeting on post-traumatic cranioplasty. Acta Neurochir 163(2):423–440
Kim B-J, Hong K-S, Park K-J, Park D-H, Chung Y-G, Kang S-H (2012) Customized cranioplasty implants using three-dimensional printers and polymethyl-methacrylate casting. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 52(6):541
[DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2012.52.6.541]
Kim J, Kim JH, Kim JH, Kwon T-H, Roh H (2019) Outcomes of cranioplasty using autologous bone or 3D-customized titanium mesh following decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury: differences in complications. J Trauma Inj 32(4):202–209
[DOI: 10.20408/jti.2019.033]
Koper D, ter Laak-Poort M, Lethaus B, Yamauchi K, Moroni L, Habibovic P, Kessler P (2019) Cranioplasty with patient-specific implants in repeatedly reconstructed cases. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 47(5):709–714
[DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.01.034]
Kriegel RJ, Schaller C, Clusmann H (2007) Cranioplasty for large skull defects with PMMA (polymethylmethacrylate) or tutoplast® processed autogenic bone grafts. Zentralblatt Für Neurochir-Cent Eur Neurosurg 68(04):182–189
[DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-985857]
Marchac D, Greensmith A (2008) Long-term experience with methylmethacrylate cranioplasty in craniofacial surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61(7):744–752
[DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.10.055]
Maricevich JPBR, Cezar-Junior AB, de Oliveira-Junior EX, e Silva JAMV, da Silva JVL, Nunes, A ... Azevedo-Filho HRC (2019) Functional and aesthetic evaluation after cranial reconstruction with polymethyl methacrylate prostheses using low-cost 3D printing templates in patients with cranial defects secondary to decompressive craniectomies: A prospective study. Surgical neurology Int 10. https://doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_149_18
Morales-Gómez JA, Garcia-Estrada E, Leos-Bortoni JE, Delgado-Brito M, Flores-Huerta LE, Adriana A, Torres-Díaz LJ, de León ÁRM-P (2018) Cranioplasty with a low-cost customized polymethylmethacrylate implant using a desktop 3D printer. J Neurosurg 130(5):1721–1727
[DOI: 10.3171/2017.12.JNS172574]
Moser M, Schmid R, Schindel R, Hildebrandt G (2017) Patient-specific polymethylmethacrylate prostheses for secondary reconstruction of large calvarial defects: a retrospective feasibility study of a new intraoperative moulding device for cranioplasty. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 45(2):295–303
[DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.11.016]
Piitulainen JM, Kauko T, Aitasalo KM, Vuorinen V, Vallittu PK, Posti JP (2015) Outcomes of cranioplasty with synthetic materials and autologous bone grafts. World Neurosurg 83(5):708–714
[DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.01.014]
Punchak M, Chung LK, Lagman C, Bui TT, Lazareff J, Rezzadeh K, Jarrahy R, Yang I (2017) Outcomes following polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cranioplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci 41:30–35
[DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.03.028]
Rotaru H, Stan H, Florian IS, Schumacher R, Park Y-T, Kim S-G, Chezan H, Balc N, Baciut M (2012) Cranioplasty with custom-made implants: analyzing the cases of 10 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70(2):e169–e176
[DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.09.036]
Shah AM, Jung H, Skirboll S (2014) Materials used in cranioplasty: a history and analysis. Neurosurg Focus 36(4):E19
[DOI: 10.3171/2014.2.FOCUS13561]
Sun Y, Hu Y, Yuan Q, Yu J, Wu X, Du Z, Wu X, Hu J (2018) Association between metal hypersensitivity and implant failure in patients who underwent titanium cranioplasty. J Neurosurg 131(1):40–46
[DOI: 10.3171/2018.1.JNS171804]
Swanson E (2013) Levels of evidence in cosmetic surgery: analysis and recommendations using a new CLEAR classification. Plast Reconstr Surg Global Open 1(8). https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000001
Tan ET, Ling JM, Dinesh SK (2016) The feasibility of producing patient-specific acrylic cranioplasty implants with a low-cost 3D printer. J Neurosurg 124(5):1531–1537
[DOI: 10.3171/2015.5.JNS15119]
Tawab MGA, Latif MA, Osman AAL (2019) Cranioplasty of calvarial skull defects: a comparative study between using three dimensional custom-made cranioprostheses versus hand-made bone cement in restoring skull configuration. Open J Mod Neurosurg 9(3):314–326
[DOI: 10.4236/ojmn.2019.93030]
Thien A, King NK, Ang BT, Wang E, Ng I (2015) Comparison of polyetheretherketone and titanium cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy. World Neurosurg 83(2):176–180
[DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.06.003]
Wallace RD, Salt C, Konofaos P (2015) Comparison of autogenous and alloplastic cranioplasty materials following impact testing. J Craniofac Surg 26(5):1551–1557
[DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001882]
Zanotti B, Zingaretti N, Verlicchi A, Robiony M, Alfieri A, Parodi PC (2016) Cranioplasty: review of materials. J Craniofac Surg 27(8):2061–2072
[DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003025]
