The nutritional quality of food parcels provided by food banks and the effectiveness of food banks at reducing food insecurity in developed countries: a mixed-method systematic review.

Lucy Oldroyd, Fatemeh Eskandari, Charlotte Pratt, Amelia A Lake
Author Information
  1. Lucy Oldroyd: Centre for Public Health Research, School of Health & Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
  2. Fatemeh Eskandari: Centre for Public Health Research, School of Health & Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK. ORCID
  3. Charlotte Pratt: Centre for Public Health Research, School of Health & Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
  4. Amelia A Lake: Centre for Public Health Research, School of Health & Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research indicates that food parcels provided by food banks are nutritionally poor. Food insecurity and the use of food banks are both rising, with detrimental effects on the dietary intake and health of users. This mixed-method systematic review aims to investigate the current nutritional adequacy of pre-packaged food parcels and whether using food banks reduces the food insecurity and improves the dietary intake of their users.
METHODS: A mixed-method systematic literature review, restricted to articles published from 2015, was conducted using eight electronic databases, four grey literature databases and eight relevant websites. Quantitative findings, investigating the nutritional quality of food parcels and/or their impact on dietary intake or food insecurity, were presented narratively. Qualitative findings reporting the views of food bank users regarding food from food banks underwent thematic synthesis. These independent syntheses were integrated using configurative analysis and presented narratively.
RESULTS: Of 2189 articles, 11 quantitative and 10 qualitative were included. Food parcels were inconsistent at meeting nutritional requirements and often failed to meet individual needs, including cultural and health preferences. Using food banks improved food security and dietary quality of users, allowing otherwise unachievable access to food. However, food insecurity remained, and is explained by limited food variety, quality and choice. The mixed-method findings support interventions to ensure consistent, adequate nutrition at food banks, including catering for individual needs.
CONCLUSIONS: Food banks are a lifeline for those severely food insecure. However when used alone, food banks struggle to eliminate the heightened food insecurity of their users. Efforts to improve the nutritional quality of food parcels could improve the experiences and diet-related outcomes of those requiring food banks.

Keywords

References

  1. Eur J Nutr. 2020 Dec;59(8):3491-3501 [PMID: 31996978]
  2. J Public Health (Oxf). 2022 Aug 25;44(3):634-641 [PMID: 33866365]
  3. Appetite. 2018 Jan 1;120:698-708 [PMID: 29079476]
  4. Public Health Nutr. 2019 Dec;22(17):3261-3269 [PMID: 31486351]
  5. Am J Health Behav. 2019 Jan 1;43(1):105-118 [PMID: 30522570]
  6. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020 Nov 11;112(5):1162-1169 [PMID: 32766740]
  7. Am J Public Health. 2018 Sep;108(9):1227-1234 [PMID: 30024798]
  8. Voluntas. 2020;31(5):853-869 [PMID: 33184533]
  9. SSM Popul Health. 2016 Mar 11;2:62-67 [PMID: 29349128]
  10. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2017 Dec;30(6):791-799 [PMID: 28608509]
  11. Soc Sci Med. 2018 Mar;200:129-136 [PMID: 29421459]
  12. Br J Nutr. 2016 Aug;116(3):526-33 [PMID: 27229880]
  13. Soc Sci Med. 2003 Apr;56(7):1505-15 [PMID: 12614701]
  14. Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Jan 09;17:E04 [PMID: 31922370]
  15. Eur J Nutr. 2018 Dec;57(8):2747-2758 [PMID: 28975454]
  16. Public Health Nutr. 2017 Jun;20(8):1414-1422 [PMID: 28318474]
  17. Soc Sci Med. 2015 May;132:38-44 [PMID: 25792338]
  18. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097 [PMID: 19621072]
  19. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2020 Aug;33(4):477-486 [PMID: 32048393]
  20. Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 29;5(1):164 [PMID: 27686611]
  21. BMC Public Health. 2017 Nov 21;17(1):828 [PMID: 29157208]
  22. Public Health Nutr. 2020 Jun;23(9):1647-1656 [PMID: 32066521]
  23. Nutrients. 2020 Jul 15;12(7): [PMID: 32679788]
  24. Med Clin North Am. 2017 Mar;101(2):319-332 [PMID: 28189173]
  25. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Oct;119(10):1703-1712 [PMID: 31040071]
  26. J Community Health. 2016 Aug;41(4):732-40 [PMID: 26728281]
  27. AIMS Public Health. 2015 Jul 23;2(3):297-317 [PMID: 29546112]
  28. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 14;11(3):e0150250 [PMID: 26974826]
  29. Appetite. 2021 Aug 1;163:105208 [PMID: 33774137]
  30. Front Nutr. 2018 Dec 18;5:123 [PMID: 30619869]
  31. Physiol Behav. 2020 Jun 1;220:112871 [PMID: 32179054]
  32. BMC Public Health. 2014 Nov 28;14:1234 [PMID: 25432209]
  33. Public Health Nutr. 2021 Aug;24(12):3929-3936 [PMID: 33500018]
  34. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Apr;117(4):577-588 [PMID: 27727101]
  35. Nutr Metab Insights. 2019 Jul 29;12:1178638819866434 [PMID: 31384130]
  36. JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2108-2118 [PMID: 32813460]
  37. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Jul 10;8:45 [PMID: 18616818]
  38. EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Mar 15;33:100781 [PMID: 33842868]
  39. Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;211:95-101 [PMID: 29933211]
  40. Proc Nutr Soc. 2018 Aug;77(3):270-281 [PMID: 29580316]
  41. BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 28;20(1):1309 [PMID: 32859179]
  42. PLoS One. 2014 Oct 08;9(10):e109343 [PMID: 25296332]
  43. Prev Med Rep. 2018 Jan 28;9:96-101 [PMID: 29527460]
  44. J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Dec 1;40(4):676-683 [PMID: 29145590]
  45. Nutrients. 2018 May 09;10(5): [PMID: 29747384]
  46. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;134:178-189 [PMID: 33789819]
  47. Public Health Nutr. 2013 Mar;16(3):535-43 [PMID: 22647382]
  48. Am J Public Health. 2019 Dec;109(12):1636-1640 [PMID: 31693420]
  49. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013 Mar;113(3):411-415 [PMID: 23438492]
  50. Nutrition. 2019 Jun;62:52-60 [PMID: 30852458]
  51. Public Health Nutr. 2019 Jun;22(8):1451-1460 [PMID: 30732673]
  52. Nutrients. 2020 Sep 02;12(9): [PMID: 32887422]
  53. Eur J Nutr. 2019 Jun;58(4):1341-1350 [PMID: 29721679]
  54. Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Mar;28(2):404-413 [PMID: 31595585]
  55. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Aug;100(2):684-92 [PMID: 24944059]
  56. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2019 Feb;70(1):78-87 [PMID: 29701137]
  57. Public Health Nutr. 2019 Jun;22(9):1704-1716 [PMID: 30834852]
  58. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):179-87 [PMID: 26262565]
  59. J Nutr. 1990 Nov;120 Suppl 11:1559-600 [PMID: 2243305]
  60. Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Jan 24;16:E09 [PMID: 30676935]
  61. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Apr;117(4):563-576 [PMID: 27727100]
  62. Public Health Nutr. 2018 Nov;21(16):3067-3079 [PMID: 30021665]
  63. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 May;120(5):792-803.e5 [PMID: 31636053]
  64. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2022 Dec;35(6):1202-1229 [PMID: 35112742]
  65. Public Health Nutr. 2020 Oct;23(14):2602-2614 [PMID: 32336313]

Grants

  1. MR/K02325X/1/Medical Research Council

MeSH Term

Humans
Food Assistance
Developed Countries
Nutritive Value
Food Insecurity
Food
Food Supply

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0foodbanksparcelsinsecurityusersnutritionalqualitydietarymixed-methodFoodintakesystematicreviewusingfindingsprovidedhealthliteraturearticleseightdatabasespresentednarrativelybankindividualneedsincludingsecurityHowevernutritionimproveBACKGROUND:Researchindicatesnutritionallypooruserisingdetrimentaleffectsaimsinvestigatecurrentadequacypre-packagedwhetherreducesimprovesMETHODS:restrictedpublished2015conductedelectronicfourgreyrelevantwebsitesQuantitativeinvestigatingand/orimpactQualitativereportingviewsregardingunderwentthematicsynthesisindependentsynthesesintegratedconfigurativeanalysisRESULTS:218911quantitative10qualitativeincludedinconsistentmeetingrequirementsoftenfailedmeetculturalpreferencesUsingimprovedallowingotherwiseunachievableaccessremainedexplainedlimitedvarietychoicesupportinterventionsensureconsistentadequatecateringCONCLUSIONS:lifelineseverelyinsecureusedalonestruggleeliminateheightenedEffortsexperiencesdiet-relatedoutcomesrequiringeffectivenessreducingdevelopedcountries:assistanceparcel

Similar Articles

Cited By