Time-dependent expression of high-mobility group box-1 and toll-like receptors proteins as potential determinants of skin wound age in rats: Forensic implication.

Yasmina M Abd-Elhakim, Bothina H F Omran, Shimaa A Ezzeldein, Amany I Ahmed, Nabela I El-Sharkawy, Amany Abdel-Rahman Mohamed
Author Information
  1. Yasmina M Abd-Elhakim: Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt. yasmina_forensic@hotmail.com.
  2. Bothina H F Omran: Department of Forensic Medicine and Clinical Toxicology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
  3. Shimaa A Ezzeldein: Department of Surgery, Anesthesiology and Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
  4. Amany I Ahmed: Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
  5. Nabela I El-Sharkawy: Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
  6. Amany Abdel-Rahman Mohamed: Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt. amanyrahman292@gmail.com.

Abstract

The skin wound age determination in living subjects is an imperative task for forensic experts. In this study, we investigated the time-dependent expression of high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB1) and toll-like receptors 2 and 4 (TLR2 and 4) in rat skin wounds using real-time PCR and seek their forensic potentials during the skin wound repair process. In addition, the levels of serum pro-inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin 6 (IL-6)), as well as nitric oxide (NO) production, were measured. The wound tissue and serum samples were collected after 30 min, 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, 1 day, 3 days, 5 days, and 7 days after incision. As a control (zero time), skin specimens and blood samples were collected without incision. The results reveal that the HMGB1, TLR2, and TLR4 expression levels were increased in a time-dependent manner until the first day where the peak level was achieved for the three tested genes compared with the zero time. On the 7 day, the statistical significance was lost for TLR2 and TLR4 but persisted for HMGB1. The serum TNF-α, IL6, and NO levels peaked within 30 min and 1 and 3 day after injury, respectively. On the 7 day after incision, no significant differences exist in the TNF-α serum level compared to the control group, but the statistical significance persisted for IL6 and NO. It was apparent that the analyzed genes in the wound tissues showed higher R2 values rather than the serum biochemical indicators. Of note, a strong positive correlation was evident between the HMGB1 and that of TLR2 and TLR4 relative expression as well as IL-6 serum level. Conclusively, based on the observed changes in the analyzed markers in wound tissues and serum and R2 values obtained from mathematical models established to determine the wound age, the relative expression of HMGB1, TLR2, and TLR4 could be a reliable indicator for wound age determination in living subjects. Further investigation of these markers and mathematical models in human tissues is necessary.

Keywords

References

  1. Mediators Inflamm. 2013;2013:434010 [PMID: 23533306]
  2. Trends Mol Med. 2007 Nov;13(11):460-9 [PMID: 18029230]
  3. Mediators Inflamm. 2006;2006(4):24396 [PMID: 17047288]
  4. Angiogenesis. 2008;11(1):91-9 [PMID: 18264787]
  5. Am J Cancer Res. 2013;3(1):1-20 [PMID: 23359863]
  6. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Jun;73(6):821-4 [PMID: 19303147]
  7. Physiol Rev. 2019 Jan 1;99(1):311-379 [PMID: 30379623]
  8. Trends Immunol. 2013 Oct;34(10):511-9 [PMID: 23886621]
  9. J Leukoc Biol. 2003 Jun;73(6):713-21 [PMID: 12773503]
  10. J Surg Res. 2012 Jul;176(1):343-7 [PMID: 21872885]
  11. J Wound Care. 2007 Feb;16(2):76-8 [PMID: 17319622]
  12. Int J Legal Med. 2010 Sep;124(5):397-404 [PMID: 20535492]
  13. J Immunol. 2005 Jun 15;174(12):7506-15 [PMID: 15944249]
  14. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2000 Mar;21(1):21-31 [PMID: 10739222]
  15. Int J Legal Med. 2008 Mar;122(2):143-8 [PMID: 17724607]
  16. Mol Immunol. 2013 May;54(1):48-57 [PMID: 23201852]
  17. J Thromb Haemost. 2007 Jan;5(1):109-16 [PMID: 17239166]
  18. Lasers Surg Med. 2006 Apr;38(4):277-89 [PMID: 16538661]
  19. Cytokine. 1996 Jul;8(7):548-56 [PMID: 8891436]
  20. Int J Legal Med. 1994;107(2):60-8 [PMID: 7529545]
  21. Science. 1999 Jul 9;285(5425):248-51 [PMID: 10398600]
  22. J Leukoc Biol. 2009 Sep;86(3):655-62 [PMID: 19564572]
  23. J Biol Chem. 2004 Feb 27;279(9):7370-7 [PMID: 14660645]
  24. Shock. 2002 Apr;17(4):329-33 [PMID: 11954836]
  25. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014 Sep 04;6(10):a016295 [PMID: 25190079]
  26. Exp Ther Med. 2010 Jan;1(1):109-111 [PMID: 23136602]
  27. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2017 Oct 1;6(10):344-355 [PMID: 29062591]
  28. N Engl J Med. 1999 Sep 2;341(10):738-46 [PMID: 10471461]
  29. Med Sci Law. 2007 Apr;47(2):134-40 [PMID: 17520958]
  30. Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Jan 17;165(2-3):150-4 [PMID: 16806766]
  31. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1997 Jan;29(1):231-9 [PMID: 9076958]
  32. Forensic Sci Int. 2000 Sep 11;113(1-3):251-64 [PMID: 10978634]
  33. Blood. 2003 Oct 1;102(7):2660-9 [PMID: 12829592]
  34. Adv Dermatol. 2008;24:71-87 [PMID: 19256306]
  35. Histochem J. 2000 Feb;32(2):85-91 [PMID: 10816072]
  36. Blood. 2005 Jul 15;106(2):609-16 [PMID: 15802534]
  37. Immunobiology. 2011 Jul;216(7):753-62 [PMID: 21281986]
  38. J Invest Dermatol. 2008 Jun;128(6):1545-53 [PMID: 18239618]
  39. J Leukoc Biol. 2004 May;75(5):777-84 [PMID: 14996826]
  40. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003 Sep;3(9):745-56 [PMID: 12949498]
  41. J Surg Res. 2007 Sep;142(1):143-52 [PMID: 17604053]
  42. Wound Repair Regen. 2009 Sep-Oct;17(5):758-61 [PMID: 19769728]
  43. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Nov 15;164(10 Pt 1):1768-73 [PMID: 11734424]
  44. Int J Legal Med. 2005 Jan;119(1):16-21 [PMID: 15205965]
  45. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Mar;21:119-25 [PMID: 26765251]
  46. EMBO Rep. 2004 Aug;5(8):825-30 [PMID: 15272298]
  47. Cell Immunol. 2017 May;315:1-10 [PMID: 28284487]
  48. Forensic Sci Int. 2003 Jan 28;131(2-3):156-61 [PMID: 12590055]
  49. Int Wound J. 2019 Dec;16(6):1416-1425 [PMID: 31448552]
  50. Anestezjol Intens Ter. 2008 Oct-Dec;40(4):253-59 [PMID: 19517667]
  51. Forensic Sci Int. 2015 Feb;247:7-13 [PMID: 25506669]
  52. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006 Aug 4;346(3):739-45 [PMID: 16781673]
  53. Int J Legal Med. 2000;113(3):140-5 [PMID: 10876984]
  54. J Forensic Leg Med. 2008 Aug;15(6):368-72 [PMID: 18586206]
  55. Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8 [PMID: 11846609]
  56. J Forensic Leg Med. 2016 Nov;44:14-19 [PMID: 27589380]
  57. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012 Jan 31;8(4):195-202 [PMID: 22293756]
  58. Int J Legal Med. 1996;108(5):231-6 [PMID: 8721421]
  59. Neoplasia. 2009 Jul;11(7):615-28 [PMID: 19568407]
  60. Immunol Rev. 2017 Nov;280(1):74-82 [PMID: 29027228]
  61. Anticancer Res. 2012 Sep;32(9):4067-9 [PMID: 22993362]
  62. Nature. 2002 Jul 11;418(6894):191-5 [PMID: 12110890]
  63. Int J Legal Med. 1998;111(5):251-5 [PMID: 9728752]
  64. World J Emerg Med. 2011;2(4):302-6 [PMID: 25215028]
  65. Forensic Sci Int. 2002 Dec 4;130(2-3):90-6 [PMID: 12477628]
  66. Cell Mol Immunol. 2017 Jan;14(1):43-64 [PMID: 27569562]
  67. Int J Legal Med. 2010 Nov;124(6):523-36 [PMID: 20838804]
  68. Cytokine. 2020 Feb;126:154880 [PMID: 31739216]
  69. J Immunol. 2000 Jun 1;164(11):5998-6004 [PMID: 10820283]
  70. EMBO J. 2003 Oct 15;22(20):5551-60 [PMID: 14532127]
  71. Forensic Sci Int. 2017 Mar;272:104-110 [PMID: 28129582]

MeSH Term

Animals
Humans
Rats
Cytokines
HMGB1 Protein
Interleukin-6
Nitric Oxide
Toll-Like Receptor 2
Toll-Like Receptor 4
Toll-Like Receptors
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Chemicals

Cytokines
HMGB1 Protein
Interleukin-6
Nitric Oxide
Toll-Like Receptor 2
Toll-Like Receptor 4
Toll-Like Receptors
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0woundserumskinageexpressionHMGB1TLR2groupTLR4box-1receptorslevelsTNF-αNOincisionleveltissuesdeterminationlivingsubjectsforensictime-dependenthigh-mobilitytoll-like4PCRIL-6welloxidesamplescollected30 mincontrolzerotimegenescompared7 daystatisticalsignificancepersistedIL6analyzedR2valuesrelativemarkersmathematicalmodelsimperativetaskexpertsstudyinvestigated2ratwoundsusingreal-timeseekpotentialsrepairprocessadditionpro-inflammatorycytokinestumornecrosisfactor-alphainterleukin6nitricproductionmeasuredtissue2 h6 h12 h1 day3 days5 days7 daysspecimensbloodwithoutresultsrevealincreasedmannerfirstdaypeakachievedthreetestedlostpeakedwithin1 and3 dayinjuryrespectivelysignificantdifferencesexistapparentshowedhigherratherbiochemicalindicatorsnotestrongpositivecorrelationevidentConclusivelybasedobservedchangesobtainedestablisheddeterminereliableindicatorinvestigationhumannecessaryTime-dependentproteinspotentialdeterminantsrats:ForensicimplicationHigh-mobilityNitricPro-inflammatorycytokineReal-timeToll-likeWoundestimation

Similar Articles

Cited By