Comparison of National Growth Standards for Turkish Infants and Children with World Health Organization Growth Standards

Rüveyde Bundak, Zehra Yavaş Abalı, Andrzej Furman, Feyza Darendeliler, Gülbin Gökçay, Firdevs Baş, Hülya Günöz, Olcay Neyzi
Author Information
  1. Rüveyde Bundak: University of Kyrenia, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Kyrenia, North Cyprus ORCID
  2. Zehra Yavaş Abalı: İstanbul University, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, İstanbul, Turkey ORCID
  3. Andrzej Furman: Boğaziçi University, Institute of Environmental Sciences, İstanbul, Turkey ORCID
  4. Feyza Darendeliler: İstanbul University, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, İstanbul, Turkey ORCID
  5. Gülbin Gökçay: İstanbul University, Institute of Child Health, Department of Social Pediatrics, İstanbul, Turkey ORCID
  6. Firdevs Baş: İstanbul University, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, İstanbul, Turkey ORCID
  7. Hülya Günöz: İstanbul University, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, İstanbul, Turkey ORCID
  8. Olcay Neyzi: İstanbul University, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, İstanbul, Turkey

Abstract

Objective: Using World Health Organization (WHO) standards in pediatric practice is still controversial in many countries. It is suggested that national growth charts best reflect the genetic and ethnic characteristics of a population. The aim of this study was to compare length/height, body weight, and body mass index (BMI) in healthy Turkish children of ages 0 to 18 with those proposed by WHO as the international growth standards.
Methods: The data of Turkish children were collected from infant/child population aged 0-5 years (2391 boys, 2102 girls) and children of ages between 6-18 years (1100 boys, 1020 girls). For comparison, the 50, 3, and 97 percentile curves for length/height, weight, and BMI in Turkish children were plotted together with respective WHO data.
Results: Heights were essentially similar in the Turkish and WHO data at ages between 3-10 years. Turkish children were markedly taller compared to the WHO standards after the age of 10 years. Evaluation of the 3rd percentile data revealed that Turkish boys were shorter than the WHO subjects in the first 2 years of life. From 6 months of age, Turkish children showed higher weight for age values in the 3, 50, and 97 percentiles. In all age groups between 6 months and 3 years, and in between 6-18 years of age, Z-score values, as well as the 50, 15, 85, and 95 percentile values were higher in Turkish children. The differences were particularly noteworthy at ages 1-2 years and in the pubertal years.
Conclusion: WHO growth standards do not reflect the growth of Turkish children and may substantially alter the prevalence of short stature and underweight in Turkish children in the 0-5 years age group. When assessing the nutritional and growth status of children, national growth standards may be more appropriate.

Keywords

References

  1. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008 Mar;46(3):316-21 [PMID: 18376251]
  2. Ann Hum Biol. 2011 Jan;38(1):7-11 [PMID: 21175302]
  3. Arch Dis Child. 2008 Jul;93(7):561-5 [PMID: 17556396]
  4. Acta Paediatr. 2006 Dec;95(12):1635-41 [PMID: 17129974]
  5. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 11;10(3):e0120806 [PMID: 25761138]
  6. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2006 Apr;450:76-85 [PMID: 16817681]
  7. Arch Dis Child. 2008 Jul;93(7):566-9 [PMID: 17908712]
  8. Ann Hum Biol. 2011 Mar;38(2):121-30 [PMID: 20939749]
  9. Acta Paediatr. 1999 Aug;88(8):797-802 [PMID: 10503674]
  10. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2008;1(1):8-14 [PMID: 21318059]
  11. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2012 May;15(3):298-302 [PMID: 22327335]
  12. Ann Hum Biol. 1975 Jan;2(1):49-59 [PMID: 16431663]
  13. BMJ. 2010 Mar 15;340:c1140 [PMID: 20231247]
  14. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2015 Dec;7(4):280-93 [PMID: 26777039]
  15. Matern Child Nutr. 2012 Apr;8(2):249-58 [PMID: 20880098]
  16. Eur J Pediatr. 2014 Jul;173(7):861-9 [PMID: 24401935]
  17. Nutr Res Rev. 1993 Jan;6(1):19-50 [PMID: 19094301]
  18. Acta Paediatr. 2006 Feb;95(2):194-8 [PMID: 16449026]
  19. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1990 Jan;44(1):45-60 [PMID: 2354692]
  20. Child Care Health Dev. 2008 Jul;34(4):454-63 [PMID: 18394005]
  21. Arch Dis Child. 2011 Oct;96(10):916-21 [PMID: 19948662]
  22. Eur J Pediatr. 2007 Jun;166(6):595-600 [PMID: 17102974]
  23. J Nutr. 2007 Jan;137(1):144-8 [PMID: 17182816]
  24. Acta Paediatr. 2014 Feb;103(2):214-24 [PMID: 24127859]
  25. Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Sep;85(9):660-7 [PMID: 18026621]
  26. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012 May;97(3):F219-22 [PMID: 21398325]
  27. Arch Dis Child. 2008 Jul;93(7):549-51 [PMID: 18567767]
  28. BMJ Open. 2015 Feb 25;5(2):e006107 [PMID: 25716173]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Body Height
Body Mass Index
Body Weight
Child
Child, Preschool
Female
Growth Charts
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Male
Reference Values
World Health Organization

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0TurkishchildrenyearsWHOstandardsgrowthageagesdataweightboys503percentilevaluesWorldHealthOrganizationnationalchartsreflectpopulationlength/heightbodyBMI0-5girls6-18976monthshighermayGrowthObjective:Usingpediatricpracticestillcontroversialmanycountriessuggestedbestgeneticethniccharacteristicsaimstudycomparemassindexhealthy018proposedinternationalMethods:collectedinfant/childaged2391210211001020comparisoncurvesplottedtogetherrespectiveResults:Heightsessentiallysimilar3-10markedlytallercompared10Evaluation3rdrevealedshortersubjectsfirst2lifeshowedpercentilesgroupsZ-scorewell158595differencesparticularlynoteworthy1-2pubertalConclusion:substantiallyalterprevalenceshortstatureunderweightgroupassessingnutritionalstatusappropriateComparisonNationalStandardsInfantsChildrenStandardsGrowth

Similar Articles

Cited By