Assessment of the Effectiveness of the Sonofeedback Method in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women-Preliminary Report.

Gabriela Kołodyńska, Maciej Zalewski, Anna Mucha, Waldemar Andrzejewski
Author Information
  1. Gabriela Kołodyńska: Department of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, 51-612 Wroclaw, Poland. ORCID
  2. Maciej Zalewski: Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Wrocław, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland. ORCID
  3. Anna Mucha: Department of Genetics, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-375 Wroclaw, Poland. ORCID
  4. Waldemar Andrzejewski: Department of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, 51-612 Wroclaw, Poland.

Abstract

Urinary incontinence is a common problem that affects postmenopausal women. This ailment has a negative impact on many aspects of life, significantly limiting everyday functioning related to professional work, physical activity or the intimate sphere. The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of the sonofeedback method in reducing the severity of urinary incontinence in postmenopausal women with a urinary incontinence problem. A total of 60 patients aged 45-65 with stress urinary incontinence, confirmed by a gynecologist, were qualified for the study. All persons qualified for the study were randomly assigned to study group A ( = 20), comparative B ( = 20) and control C ( = 20). Patients from group A were treated with sonofeedback of the pelvic floor muscles. In group B, the combined electrostimulation method was used with biofeedback training. Group C was a control group in which only the measured parameters were measured at the same time interval as those carried out in groups A and B. In all patients, three times: before the therapy, after the fifth procedure and after the end of the therapy, the incidence and severity of stress urinary incontinence were assessed-Gaudenz questionnaire and the intensity of urinary incontinence-a modified 1 h pad test. The obtained results have an application value giving the possibility of using effective therapy with sonofeedback in women in whom the recommended electrostimulation method cannot be used due to health and behavioral reasons.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Womens Health. 2018 Apr 17;10:195-201 [PMID: 29713205]
  2. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Aug;38 Suppl 4:S7-S11 [PMID: 31063654]
  3. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29 Suppl 1:S13-7 [PMID: 20419794]
  4. Ceska Gynekol. 2019 Winter;84(2):115-120 [PMID: 31238681]
  5. Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25(5):424-7 [PMID: 16721815]
  6. Urol Nurs. 2014 Jul-Aug;34(4):193-202 [PMID: 25233622]
  7. J Urol. 2018 Jun;199(6):1557-1564 [PMID: 29175541]
  8. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;31(6):485-493 [PMID: 31609735]
  9. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011 Sep-Oct;15(5):386-92 [PMID: 22002190]
  10. J Physiother. 2020 Jan;66(1):7-8 [PMID: 31859151]
  11. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Feb;39(2):754-761 [PMID: 31945207]
  12. Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Nov;30(11):1785-1794 [PMID: 31410520]
  13. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2019 Apr;11(2):O186-O192 [PMID: 29266769]
  14. Aust J Physiother. 2005;51(3):167-70 [PMID: 16137242]
  15. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Aug;37(8):487-98 [PMID: 17877285]
  16. Minerva Ginecol. 2019 Aug;71(4):306-312 [PMID: 29952478]
  17. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Aug;53(8):453-8 [PMID: 10562862]
  18. Curr Urol Rep. 2018 Feb 12;19(1):9 [PMID: 29435856]
  19. Auton Neurosci. 2016 Oct;200:43-48 [PMID: 26209089]
  20. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2016 Feb;38(2):97-111 [PMID: 26883864]
  21. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Nov;37(8):2875-2880 [PMID: 30178605]
  22. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:274938 [PMID: 24701567]
  23. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Jan;36(1):98-103 [PMID: 26352786]
  24. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Nov;36(8):2142-2147 [PMID: 28508398]
  25. Trials. 2021 Nov 20;22(1):823 [PMID: 34801063]
  26. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Feb;39(2):650-657 [PMID: 31774204]
  27. Asian J Urol. 2018 Jul;5(3):141-148 [PMID: 29988831]
  28. Indian J Urol. 2013 Jan;29(1):31-6 [PMID: 23671362]
  29. Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Jan;29(1):169-170 [PMID: 28948311]
  30. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013 Jun;32(5):460-6 [PMID: 23023996]
  31. Physiother Theory Pract. 2017 Apr;33(4):296-302 [PMID: 28443787]
  32. Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Oct;24(10):1631-8 [PMID: 23443345]
  33. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 08;16(22): [PMID: 31717291]
  34. Ginekol Pol. 2008 May;79(5):338-41 [PMID: 18624108]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0incontinenceurinarystudysonofeedbackgroupwomenmethodstress=20BelectrostimulationtherapyUrinaryproblempostmenopausalseveritypatientsqualifiedcontrolCusedmeasuredcommonaffectsailmentnegativeimpactmanyaspectslifesignificantlylimitingeverydayfunctioningrelatedprofessionalworkphysicalactivityintimatesphereaimassesseffectivenessreducingtotal60aged45-65confirmedgynecologistpersonsrandomlyassignedcomparativePatientstreatedpelvicfloormusclescombinedbiofeedbacktrainingGroupparameterstimeintervalcarriedgroupsthreetimes:fifthprocedureendincidenceassessed-Gaudenzquestionnaireintensityincontinence-amodified1hpadtestobtainedresultsapplicationvaluegivingpossibilityusingeffectiverecommendedduehealthbehavioralreasonsAssessmentEffectivenessSonofeedbackMethodTreatmentStressIncontinenceWomen-PreliminaryReport

Similar Articles

Cited By