Service contracting as a policy response for public transport recovery during the Covid-19 Pandemic: A preliminary evaluation.

Varsolo Sunio, Wilhansen Joseph Li, Joemier Pontawe, Albert Dizon, Joel Bienne Valderrama, Agnes Robang
Author Information
  1. Varsolo Sunio: Philippine Council for Industry, Energy, and Emerging Technology Research and Development, Department of Science and Technology, Taguig City, Philippines.
  2. Wilhansen Joseph Li: Sakay Mobility Philippines Corporation, Philippines.
  3. Joemier Pontawe: Department of Transportation, Philippines.
  4. Albert Dizon: Sakay Mobility Philippines Corporation, Philippines.
  5. Joel Bienne Valderrama: Department of Geography, College of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of the Philippines-Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines.
  6. Agnes Robang: Sakay Mobility Philippines Corporation, Philippines.

Abstract

We examine and assess the service contracting (SC) program implemented for the first time in Metro Manila, Philippines as a response to the impact of the pandemic on road-based public transport sector. We develop an evaluation framework, consisting of three indicators: social amelioration, increase in transport supply and performance improvement. These indicators are the purported objectives of SC. Using a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods, our evaluation suggests that although SC has brought positive impact in terms of the first two indicators, there is no robust evidence so far that may suggest that SC has improved the performance of public transport service delivery. We also find that while the primary objective of providing social amelioration to affected operators is appropriate during the time of the pandemic, this has also brought challenges in financially sustaining the program and in effecting improvements to public transport services. Our work aims to contribute as an empirical case study on the upsides and downsides of service contracting implemented as a business model for public transport provision during the pandemic.

Keywords

References

  1. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2022 Mar;13:100517 [PMID: 35252842]
  2. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Sep;7:100217 [PMID: 34173470]
  3. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2021 Jun;10:100366 [PMID: 36844006]
  4. Transp Policy (Oxf). 2021 Mar;103:95-102 [PMID: 33558796]
  5. Transp Policy (Oxf). 2021 Sep;110:225-237 [PMID: 34608362]
  6. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Sep;7:100203 [PMID: 34173467]
  7. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Nov;8:100242 [PMID: 34173478]
  8. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Jul;6:100154 [PMID: 34171020]
  9. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2021 Dec;12:100461 [PMID: 34541487]
  10. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2021 Mar;9:100305 [PMID: 33763645]
  11. PLoS One. 2021 May 27;16(5):e0252228 [PMID: 34043702]
  12. Sustain Cities Soc. 2021 Jul;70:102916 [PMID: 35720981]
  13. J Air Transp Manag. 2020 Oct;89:101901 [PMID: 32839647]
  14. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2022 Mar;13:100515 [PMID: 36855536]
  15. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2021 Sep;11:100450 [PMID: 34568810]
  16. Transp Policy (Oxf). 2021 Mar;103:68-85 [PMID: 33519127]
  17. Heliyon. 2021 Feb;7(2):e06260 [PMID: 33594343]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0transportpubliccontractingSCpandemicevaluationserviceprogramimplementedfirsttimeresponseimpactsocialameliorationperformanceindicatorsbroughtalsoServiceCovid-19examineassessMetroManilaPhilippinesroad-basedsectordevelopframeworkconsistingthreeindicators:increasesupplyimprovementpurportedobjectivesUsingmixqualitativequantitativemethodssuggestsalthoughpositivetermstworobustevidencefarmaysuggestimproveddeliveryfindprimaryobjectiveprovidingaffectedoperatorsappropriatechallengesfinanciallysustainingeffectingimprovementsservicesworkaimscontributeempiricalcasestudyupsidesdownsidesbusinessmodelprovisionpolicyrecoveryPandemic:preliminaryGlobalSouthPolicy

Similar Articles

Cited By