Golfers have a greater improvement in their hip specific function compared to non-golfers after total hip arthroplasty, but less than three-quarters returned to golf.

Patrick G Robinson, Shujaa Khan, Deborah MacDonald, Iain R Murray, Gavin J Macpherson, Nick D Clement
Author Information
  1. Patrick G Robinson: Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  2. Shujaa Khan: Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. ORCID
  3. Deborah MacDonald: Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  4. Iain R Murray: Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  5. Gavin J Macpherson: Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  6. Nick D Clement: Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Abstract

AIMS: Golf is a popular pursuit among those requiring total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to determine if participating in golf is associated with greater functional outcomes, satisfaction, or improvement in quality of life (QoL) compared to non-golfers.
METHODS: All patients undergoing primary THA over a one-year period at a single institution were included with one-year postoperative outcomes. patients were retrospectively followed up to assess if they had been golfers at the time of their surgery. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to assess the independent association of preoperative golfing status on outcomes.
RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of a total of 308 patients undergoing THA, of whom 44 were golfers (14%). This included 120 male patients (39%) and 188 female patients (61%), with an overall mean age of 67.8 years (SD 11.6). Golfers had a greater mean postoperative Oxford Hip Score (OHS) (3.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9 to 5.5); p < 0.001) and EuroQol visual analogue scale (5.5 (95% CI 0.1 to 11.9); p = 0.039). However, there were no differences in EuroQoL five-dimension score (p = 0.124), pain visual analogue scale (p = 0.505), or Forgotten Joint Score (p = 0.215). When adjusting for confounders, golfers had a greater improvement in their Oxford Hip Score (2.7 (95% CI 0.2 to 5.3); p < 0.001) compared to non-golfers. Of the 44 patients who reported being golfers at the time of their surgery, 32 (72.7%) returned to golf and 84.4% of those were satisfied with their involvement in golf following surgery. Those who returned to golf were more likely to be male (p = 0.039) and had higher (better) preoperative health-related QoL (p = 0.040) and hip-related functional scores (p = 0.026).
CONCLUSION: Golfers had a greater improvement in their hip-specific function compared to non-golfers after THA. However, less than three-quarters of patients return to golf, with male patients and those who had greater preoperative QoL or hip-related function being more likely to return to play. Cite this article:  2022;3(2):145-151.

Keywords

References

  1. JBJS Rev. 2016 Dec 27;4(12): [PMID: 28060788]
  2. NCHS Data Brief. 2015 Feb;(186):1-8 [PMID: 25714040]
  3. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jan;68(1):73-9 [PMID: 25441700]
  4. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Sep 5;100(17):1455-1460 [PMID: 30180053]
  5. Int Orthop. 2019 Dec;43(12):2725-2730 [PMID: 30783695]
  6. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Mar;27(3):430-436.e1 [PMID: 22000572]
  7. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Aug 27;15(1):360 [PMID: 32854732]
  8. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Apr 16;96(8):624-30 [PMID: 24740658]
  9. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5 [PMID: 17403800]
  10. BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 28;7(11):e018993 [PMID: 29187418]
  11. Bone Joint J. 2020 Nov;102-B(11):1519-1526 [PMID: 33135448]
  12. Acta Orthop. 2020 Jun;91(3):313-318 [PMID: 32237927]
  13. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009 Jun;19(3):419-24 [PMID: 18510595]
  14. J Arthroplasty. 2021 Aug;36(8):2850-2857 [PMID: 33875289]
  15. J Aging Phys Act. 2010 Jan;18(1):1-13 [PMID: 20181990]
  16. J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jul;35(7):1826-1832 [PMID: 32205005]
  17. J Arthroplasty. 2007 Jun;22(4):549-52 [PMID: 17562412]
  18. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006 Aug;81(8):1041-3 [PMID: 16901027]
  19. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Aug;89(8):1010-4 [PMID: 17785736]
  20. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 Mar;78(2):185-90 [PMID: 8666621]
  21. Bone Joint J. 2019 Aug;101-B(8):941-950 [PMID: 31362549]
  22. JBJS Rev. 2020 Apr;8(4):e0197 [PMID: 32539265]
  23. Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36 [PMID: 21479777]
  24. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Jul;94(7):974-81 [PMID: 22733956]
  25. Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Feb 02;3:622171 [PMID: 33604568]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.00ppatients=THAgolfgreaterhipScore5functionaloutcomesimprovementcomparednon-golfersgolfersHipvisualanaloguescaletotalarthroplastyQoLsurgerypreoperativemaleGolfersOxford395%CI2returnedfunctionGolfstudyundergoingprimaryone-yearincludedpostoperativeassesstimelinearregressionanalysis44mean11OHS719<001039HoweverpainForgottenJointlikelyhip-relatedscoreslessthree-quartersreturnAIMS:popularpursuitamongrequiringaimdetermineparticipatingassociatedsatisfactionqualitylifeMETHODS:periodsingleinstitutionPatientsretrospectivelyfollowedMultivariateperformedindependentassociationgolfingstatusRESULTS:cohortconsisted30814%12039%188female61%overallage678yearsSD6confidenceintervalEuroQoldifferencesEuroQoLfive-dimensionscore124505215adjustingconfoundersreported32727%844%satisfiedinvolvementfollowinghigherbetterhealth-related040026CONCLUSION:hip-specificplayCitearticle: 2022:145-151specificArthroplastyFJSOutcomesRecoveryTotal

Similar Articles

Cited By (4)