The costs and benefits of dispersal in small populations.

Jitka Polechová
Author Information
  1. Jitka Polechová: University of Vienna, Department of Mathematics, 1180 Wien, Austria. ORCID

Abstract

Dispersal has three major effects on adaptation. First, gene flow mixes alleles adapted to different environments, potentially hindering (swamping) adaptation. Second, it brings in other variants and inflates genetic variance: this aids adaptation to spatially (and temporally) varying environments but if selection is hard, it lowers the mean fitness of the population. Third, neighbourhood size, which determines how weak genetic drift is, increases with dispersal-when genetic drift is strong, increase of the neighbourhood size with dispersal aids adaptation. In this note, I focus on the role of dispersal in environments that change gradually across space, and when local populations are quite small such that genetic drift has a significant effect. Using individual-based simulations, I show that in small populations, even leptokurtic dispersal benefits adaptation by reducing the power of genetic drift. This has implications for management of fragmented or marginal populations: the beneficial effect of increased dispersal into small populations is stronger than swamping of adaption under a broad range of conditions, including a mixture of local and long-distance dispersal. However, when environmental gradient is steep, heavily fat-tailed dispersal will swamp continuous adaptation so that only patches of locally adapted subpopulations remain. This article is part of the theme issue 'Species' ranges in the face of changing environments (Part II)'.

Keywords

Associated Data

Dryad | 10.5061/dryad.5vv37

References

  1. J Evol Biol. 2013 Jun;26(6):1185-202 [PMID: 23639097]
  2. Am Nat. 1997 Jul;150(1):1-23 [PMID: 18811273]
  3. Genetics. 1999 Dec;153(4):1959-71 [PMID: 10581299]
  4. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1956 Jul 24;145(920):306-8 [PMID: 13359386]
  5. Conserv Biol. 2008 Aug;22(4):878-85 [PMID: 18544089]
  6. Theor Popul Biol. 1999 Jun;55(3):283-96 [PMID: 10366553]
  7. Ecol Lett. 2012 Apr;15(4):378-92 [PMID: 22372546]
  8. Evolution. 2019 Jul;73(7):1341-1355 [PMID: 31148149]
  9. Am Nat. 2011 Oct;178 Suppl 1:S6-25 [PMID: 21956092]
  10. Am Nat. 2015 Oct;186 Suppl 1:S74-89 [PMID: 26656219]
  11. Genetics. 1931 Mar;16(2):97-159 [PMID: 17246615]
  12. Genet Res. 1980 Feb;35(1):45-57 [PMID: 7450498]
  13. Heredity (Edinb). 2015 Aug;115(2):125-9 [PMID: 24105437]
  14. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Jun 12;365(1547):1825-40 [PMID: 20439284]
  15. Am Nat. 2014 Jan;183(1):E17-35 [PMID: 24334746]
  16. Trends Ecol Evol. 2021 Jun;36(6):533-544 [PMID: 33745756]
  17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Sep 27;113(39):E5741-8 [PMID: 27621443]
  18. PLoS Biol. 2018 Jun 15;16(6):e2005372 [PMID: 29906294]
  19. Evolution. 1983 May;37(3):454-471 [PMID: 28563316]
  20. Evolution. 2021 May;75(5):1030-1045 [PMID: 33742441]

MeSH Term

Humans
Adaptation, Physiological
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Gene Flow
Genetic Drift

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0dispersaladaptationgeneticdriftenvironmentspopulationssmallgeneflowadaptedswampingaidsneighbourhoodsizelocaleffectbenefitslong-distanceenvironmentalDispersalthreemajoreffectsFirstmixesallelesdifferentpotentiallyhinderingSecondbringsvariantsinflatesvariance:spatiallytemporallyvaryingselectionhardlowersmeanfitnesspopulationThirddeterminesweakincreasesdispersal-whenstrongincreasenotefocusrolechangegraduallyacrossspacequitesignificantUsingindividual-basedsimulationsshowevenleptokurticreducingpowerimplicationsmanagementfragmentedmarginalpopulations:beneficialincreasedstrongeradaptionbroadrangeconditionsincludingmixtureHowevergradientsteepheavilyfat-tailedwillswampcontinuouspatcheslocallysubpopulationsremainarticlepartthemeissue'Species'rangesfacechangingPartII'costsgradientsevolution

Similar Articles

Cited By (5)