Impact of mobility on COVID-19 spread - A time series analysis.

Faraz Zargari, Nima Aminpour, Mohammad Amir Ahmadian, Amir Samimi, Saeid Saidi
Author Information
  1. Faraz Zargari: Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
  2. Nima Aminpour: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
  3. Mohammad Amir Ahmadian: Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
  4. Amir Samimi: Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
  5. Saeid Saidi: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the impact of mobility on the spread of COVID-19 in Tehran, Iran. We have performed a time series analysis between the indicators of public transit use and inter-city trips on the number of infected people. Our results showed a significant relationship between the number of infected people and mobility variables with both short-term and long-term lags. The long-term effect of mobility showed to have a consistent lag correlation with the weekly number of new COVID-19 positive cases. In our statistical analysis, we also investigated key non-transportation variables. For instance, the mandatory use of masks in public transit resulted in observing a 10% decrease in the number of infected people. In addition, the results confirmed that super-spreading events had significant increases in the number of positive cases. We have also assessed the impact of major events and holidays throughout the study period and analyzed the impacts of mobility patterns in those situations. Our analysis shows that holidays without inter-city travel bans have been associated with a 27% increase in the number of weekly positive cases. As such, while holidays decrease transit usage, it can overall negatively affect spread control if proper control measures are not put in place. The result and discussions in this paper can help authorities understand the effects of different strategies and protocols with a pandemic control and choose the most beneficial ones.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2003 Feb;21(2):86-8 [PMID: 12615368]
  2. Infect Dis Model. 2020 Apr 21;5:293-308 [PMID: 32355904]
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Oct 6;106(40):16897-902 [PMID: 19805184]
  4. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jul;21(7):893-903 [PMID: 32479790]
  5. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. 2021 Jan;122:102893 [PMID: 33519128]
  6. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Sep;7:100216 [PMID: 34173469]
  7. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Jul;6:100154 [PMID: 34171020]
  8. Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;96:399-407 [PMID: 32417247]
  9. BMJ. 2020 May 22;369:m1985 [PMID: 32444460]
  10. Sci Total Environ. 2020 Nov 1;741:140489 [PMID: 32599395]
  11. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Jul;6:100167 [PMID: 34173458]
  12. JAMA. 2020 Apr 21;323(15):1499-1500 [PMID: 32159735]
  13. Math Biosci. 1994 Nov;124(1):83-105 [PMID: 7827425]
  14. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2021 Jun;10:100366 [PMID: 36844006]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0numbermobilityanalysisCOVID-19transitcontrolspreadinfectedpeoplepositivecasesholidayspaperimpacttimeseriespublicuseinter-cityresultsshowedsignificantvariableslong-termweeklyalsodecreaseeventscaninvestigateTehranIranperformedindicatorstripsrelationshipshort-termlagseffectconsistentlagcorrelationnewstatisticalinvestigatedkeynon-transportationinstancemandatorymasksresultedobserving10%additionconfirmedsuper-spreadingincreasesassessedmajorthroughoutstudyperiodanalyzedimpactspatternssituationsshowswithouttravelbansassociated27%increaseusageoverallnegativelyaffectpropermeasuresputplaceresultdiscussionshelpauthoritiesunderstandeffectsdifferentstrategiesprotocolspandemicchoosebeneficialonesImpact-AutoregressivemodelMobilityPublicTime-series

Similar Articles

Cited By