Evaluation of cerebral hemodynamics by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography and its correlation with intracranial pressure in an animal model of intracranial hypertension.

Matheus Schmidt Soares, Almir Ferreira de Andrade, Sérgio Brasil, Marcelo DE-Lima-Oliveira, Alessandro Rodrigo Belon, Edson Bor-Seng-Shu, Ricardo de Carvalho Nogueira, Daniel Agustin Godoy, Wellingson Silva Paiva
Author Information
  1. Matheus Schmidt Soares: Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil. ORCID
  2. Almir Ferreira de Andrade: Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil. ORCID
  3. Sérgio Brasil: Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil. ORCID
  4. Marcelo DE-Lima-Oliveira: Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil. ORCID
  5. Alessandro Rodrigo Belon: Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil. ORCID
  6. Edson Bor-Seng-Shu: Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil. ORCID
  7. Ricardo de Carvalho Nogueira: Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil. ORCID
  8. Daniel Agustin Godoy: Hospital Carlos G. Malbrán, Sanatorio Pasteur, Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, Catamarca, Argentina. ORCID
  9. Wellingson Silva Paiva: Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcranial Doppler has been tested in the evaluation of cerebral hemodynamics as a non-invasive assessment of intracranial pressure (ICP), but there is controversy in the literature about its actual benefit and usefulness in this situation.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate cerebral blood flow assessed by Doppler technique and correlate with the variations of the ICP in the acute phase of intracranial hypertension in an animal model.
METHODS: An experimental animal model of intracranial hypertension was used. The experiment consisted of two groups of animals in which intracranial balloons were implanted and inflated with 4 mL (A) and 7 mL (B) for controlled simulation of different volumes of hematoma. The values of ICP and Doppler parameters (systolic [FVs], diastolic [FVd], and mean [FVm] cerebral blood flow velocities and pulsatility index [PI]) were collected during the entire procedure (before and during hematoma simulations and venous hypertonic saline infusion intervention). Comparisons between Doppler parameters and ICP monitoring were performed.
RESULTS: Twenty pigs were studied, 10 in group A and 10 in group B. A significant correlation between PI and ICP was obtained, especially shortly after abrupt elevation of ICP. There was no correlation between ICP and FVs, FVd or FVm separately. There was also no significant change in ICP after intravenous infusion of hypertonic saline solution.
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the potential of PI as a parameter for the evaluation of patients with suspected ICP elevation.

References

  1. Neurosurgery. 2012 Oct;71(4):853-61 [PMID: 22791038]
  2. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2012;114:121-5 [PMID: 22327676]
  3. Crit Care Med. 2005 Oct;33(10):2207-13 [PMID: 16215372]
  4. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2006;96:114-8 [PMID: 16671437]
  5. Neurol Res Int. 2018 Jun 25;2018:7053932 [PMID: 30046492]
  6. Childs Nerv Syst. 1995 Oct;11(10):595-603 [PMID: 8556727]
  7. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015 Oct;16(4):420-5 [PMID: 26140576]
  8. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2011 Feb;69(1):79-84 [PMID: 21359428]
  9. Pharm Stat. 2020 May;19(3):187-201 [PMID: 31663263]
  10. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2013 Oct;71(10):802-6 [PMID: 24212519]
  11. Anesthesiology. 2016 Aug;125(2):346-54 [PMID: 27224640]
  12. Crit Care Med. 2000 Apr;28(4):1144-51 [PMID: 10809296]
  13. J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Aug;42:148-154 [PMID: 28342705]
  14. Cleve Clin J Med. 2004 Jan;71 Suppl 1:S9-13 [PMID: 14964472]
  15. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 16;(7):CD010026 [PMID: 25019296]
  16. J Neurotrauma. 2016 Apr 15;33(8):792-802 [PMID: 26414916]
  17. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2013 Apr;19(2):77-82 [PMID: 23385373]
  18. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2003 Jul;4(3 Suppl):S28-30 [PMID: 12847343]
  19. Turk Neurosurg. 2011;21(2):210-5 [PMID: 21534204]
  20. World J Surg. 2017 Jun;41(6):1543-1549 [PMID: 28188356]
  21. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 Feb;158(2):279-87; discussion 287 [PMID: 26699376]
  22. Neurotrauma Rep. 2020 Oct 13;1(1):100-112 [PMID: 33251530]
  23. J Ultrasound Med. 2014 Dec;33(12):2131-6 [PMID: 25425369]
  24. Neurocrit Care. 2020 Aug;33(1):273-282 [PMID: 32328972]
  25. Surg Neurol. 2004 Jul;62(1):45-51; discussion 51 [PMID: 15226070]
  26. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016 Jun;16(6):56 [PMID: 27095434]
  27. Neurology. 2012 May 22;78(21):1684-91 [PMID: 22573638]
  28. N Engl J Med. 2014 May 29;370(22):2121-30 [PMID: 24869722]
  29. Neurocrit Care. 2014 Dec;21 Suppl 2:S297-361 [PMID: 25608916]
  30. Crit Care. 2020 Jun 26;24(1):379 [PMID: 32591024]
  31. J Neurosurg. 1998 May;88(5):802-8 [PMID: 9576246]
  32. N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 27;367(26):2471-81 [PMID: 23234472]
  33. Acta Neurol Scand. 2016 Jul;134(1):4-21 [PMID: 26515159]
  34. J Neuroimaging. 2007 Jan;17(1):11-8 [PMID: 17238867]
  35. Childs Nerv Syst. 2011 Jun;27(6):979-84 [PMID: 21207041]
  36. Neurosurgery. 1998 Nov;43(5):1040-9 [PMID: 9802847]
  37. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 18;99(38):e22004 [PMID: 32957318]
  38. Brain Inj. 2020 Jul 28;34(9):1270-1276 [PMID: 32744909]
  39. PLoS Med. 2017 Jul 25;14(7):e1002356 [PMID: 28742869]
  40. Surg Neurol. 2009 Oct;72(4):389-94 [PMID: 19608224]
  41. J Clin Ultrasound. 2016 Jan;44(1):40-5 [PMID: 26366515]
  42. Neurocrit Care. 2016 Dec;25(3):473-491 [PMID: 26940914]
  43. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2012 May;70(5):352-6 [PMID: 22618788]

MeSH Term

Animals
Cerebrovascular Circulation
Disease Models, Animal
Hematoma
Hemodynamics
Humans
Intracranial Hypertension
Intracranial Pressure
Swine
Ultrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ICPintracranialDopplercerebralhypertensionanimalmodelcorrelationevaluationhemodynamicspressurebloodflowmLBhematomaparametershypertonicsalineinfusion10groupsignificantPIelevationBACKGROUND:Transcranialtestednon-invasiveassessmentcontroversyliteratureactualbenefitusefulnesssituationOBJECTIVE:investigateassessedtechniquecorrelatevariationsacutephaseMETHODS:experimentalusedexperimentconsistedtwogroupsanimalsballoonsimplantedinflated47controlledsimulationdifferentvolumesvaluessystolic[FVs]diastolic[FVd]mean[FVm]velocitiespulsatilityindex[PI]collectedentireproceduresimulationsvenousinterventionComparisonsmonitoringperformedRESULTS:TwentypigsstudiedobtainedespeciallyshortlyabruptFVsFVdFVmseparatelyalsochangeintravenoussolutionCONCLUSIONS:resultsdemonstratepotentialparameterpatientssuspectedEvaluationtranscranialultrasonography

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)